Skip to main content

Will Environmental Regulation Help Reduce Pollution and Improve Efficiency?

Evidence from a Quasi-experiment in Major Cities for Pollution Control

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A New Era

Abstract

In the face of heavy pressure for both steady growth and pollution control, it is very important that we reduce pollution and improve efficiency at the same time with environmental regulations. This chapter, for the first time, uses the State Council’s 2003 air quality control program with set deadlines as a natural experiment and adopts the difference-in-differences (DID) method based on trend score match to evaluate how effective our environmental regulations are in reducing pollution and improving efficiency and reveal the systematic heterogeneity therein. Robustness test has proved the results valid and reliable. Our research findings are as follows: environmental regulation reduces pollution and improves environment quality but hampers technological progress and lowers total factor productivity in the short run; however, with time, environmental regulation will bring economic and social benefits in other aspects, which will gradually offset the loss in economic growth and ultimately do more good than harm. Thus, environmental regulation can indeed help protect the environment and grow the economy. Whether our environmental regulation can achieve this dual goal in practice depends, on the one hand, on institutional arrangements and, on the other hand, on how the external policy environment, especially market factors and the government, play their roles. In this regard, our research finds that by reducing pollution and emissions, environmental regulation helps grow the economy, and a positive institutional environment amplifies the positive effect of environmental regulation and reduces distortion.

CLC: F0626 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-8102(2016)09-0126-18

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The “good” output is the real regional gross product of relevant cities, with 1997 as the base period, while “bad” output refers to industrial waste water, industrial SO2, dust, and fumes. Labor input is represented by employed population in each city each year, while capital input is represented by the capital stock estimated with the perpetual inventory method and on the basis of comparable price. See Wang et al. (2008, 2010) for more details.

  2. 2.

    To keep the article concise, the empirical results are presented here for the robustness test. You may request them from us if you need them.

References

  • Chen, S. and Chen, T. Air Quality and Public Health: A Case Study on SO2 Emission of a Coal-fired Power Plant, Economic Research Journal, 2014 (8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. and Chen, G. Environmental Regulation and Productivity Growth: A Case Study on the Revisions in APPCL2000, Economic Research Journal, 2013 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H. et al. Public Environment Governance in Foreign Countries: Theory, System and Model. China Social Sciences Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H. and Qi, Y. Environment Quality, Public Services and People’s Health: An Analysis of Data from Various Countries and Regions, Journal of Finance and Economics, 2013 (6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. and Shen, K. Effectiveness of China’s Pollution Control Policies: An Empirical Study on Provincial Data of Industrial Pollution, Management World, 2008 (7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, J. Wang, D. and Bai, Z. Gaps in Transfer Payment, Public Expenditure and Economic Growth in Minority Areas, Economic Research Journal, 2011(S2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, Y. Lu, H. and Lv, C. Social Capital, Institutional Environment and the Effectiveness of Environment Governance: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Cities above Prefecture Level, China Population Resources and Environment, 2015 (12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M. and Wang, S. Environmental Regulation, Technological Progress and Economic Growth, Economic Research Journal, 2013 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B. Wu, Y. and Yan, P. Environmental regulation and Total Factor Productivity Growth: An Empirical Study on APEC, Economic Research Journal, 2008 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B. Wu, Y. and Yan, P. Environment Efficiency and Environment Total Factor Productivity Growth in Various Regions of China, Economic Research Journal, 2010 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. Yu, J. and Fan, G. Report on the Eight Years of Market-Oriented Development in China, Finance and Economics, 2016 (47).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. Zhou, F. Yang, H. and Guo, Q. An Empirical Study on the Regulation for Win-Win Results in Environment Protection and Economic Development, Economic Research Journal, 2009 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C. Lu, Y. Guo, L. and Yu, T. Environmental Regulation Strength and Production Technology Progress, Economic Research Journal, 2011 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. Yao, X. and Zhang, J. Impact of Education Quality on Regional Labor Productivity, Economic Research Journal, 2010 (7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R A., Local Environmental Regulation and Plant-level Productivity. Ecological Economic 1, Vol. 70, N. 12, 2011, pp. 2516–2522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chay, K. Y., and Greenstone, M., Does Air Quality Matter? Evidence from the Housing Market NBER Working Paper, No 6826, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., and Lucas, D., Greenstone, M., & Walker, R., Do Housing Prices Reflect Environmental Health Risks? Evidence from More than 1600 Toxic Plant Openings and Closings NBER Working Paper, No 18700, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., and Walker, R., Traffic Congestion and Infant Health: Evidence from E-Zpass NBER Working Paper, No 15413, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D & Wei, S J., Capital: Firm Ownership and Investment Efficiency in China. NBER Working Paper, No 13103, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenstein, A., The Consequences of Industrialization: Evidence from Water Pollution and Digestive Cancers in China. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 94, No 1,2012, pp. 186–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone, M., John, A. and Syverson, C., The Effects a! Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing. NBER Working Paper, Na 18392, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W., On the Solvability of the Regulator Equations IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol 67,No 3,2003, pp 880–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zivin, J. G., & Neidell, M., Environment, Health, and Human Capital. NBER Working Paper, No. 18935, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Qi, Y., Lu, H., Zhang, N. (2019). Will Environmental Regulation Help Reduce Pollution and Improve Efficiency?. In: He, D., Wang, C. (eds) A New Era. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8357-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics