Skip to main content

Image Quality Evaluation in Contrast Agents Computed Tomography Imaging

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
3rd International Conference on Radiation Safety & Security in Healthcare Services

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Bioengineering ((LNBE))

  • 286 Accesses

Abstract

This main goal of this study was to evaluate image quality in single-energy (SE) and dual-energy (DE) CT imaging with the presence of barium and iodine. A fabricated polymethyl methacrylate abdomen phantom with 32 cm diameter size was used to mimic human abdomen. Two different contrast agents: barium and iodine, were scanned separately. The imaging parameters for SECT were set at tube voltage 80, 120 and 140 kV while the imaging parameters for DECT were set at fixed tube voltage 80/140 kV. Both scan modes were set at the different pitch: 0.6 and 1.0 mm, and the slice thickness was set at 3.0 and 5.0 mm with automatic exposure control for the tube current. The CT images obtained from both scanning were analysed to evaluate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Barium and iodine gave highest SNR of 39.30 and 182.68, respectively, at a tube voltage of 140 kV, a pitch of 1 and a slice thickness of 3 mm for SECT. In DECT mode, the highest SNR for barium and iodine were 36.74 and 112.15 respectively at pitch 1 and slice thickness of 3 mm. There was no significant difference between SNR of barium and iodine obtained with both CT imaging modes with p-values of 0.75 and 0.12, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. He P, Wei B, Feng P, Chen M, Mi D (2013) Material discrimination based on K-edge characteristics. Comput Math Methods Med

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson NG, Butler AP, Scott NJA, Cook NJ, Butzer JS, Schleich N, Firsching M, Grasset R, Ruiter ND, Campbell M et al (2010) Spectroscopic (multi-energy) CT distinguishes iodine and barium contrast material in MICE. Eur Radiol 20:2126–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bateman CJ, Rajendran K, Ruiter NJA, Butler AP, Butler PH, Renaud PF (2015) The hidden K-edge signal in K-edge imaging. 1–7 arXiv:1506.04223v1 [physics.med-ph]

  4. He P, Wei B, Cong W, Wang G (2012) Optimization of K-edge imaging with spectral CT. Med Phys 39

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bae KT (2010) Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 256

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, Hatemura M, Imuta M, Nakaura T, Ryu D, Morishita S, Sultana S, Sato N et al (2005) Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology 237:945–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buls N, Van Gompel G, Van Cauteren T, Nieboer K, Willekens I, Verfaillie G, Evans P, Macholl S, Newton B, Mey JD (2015) Contrast agent and radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT by a combination of low tube voltage and advanced image reconstruction algorithms. Eur J Radiol 25:1023–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fessler J (2009). X-ray imaging : noise and SNR. Chapter 6, X-ray imaging noise SNR. 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hanson KM (1981) Noise and contrast discrimination in computed tomography. Radiol Skull Brain 5:3941–3955

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chaudhari A (2012) Improving signal to noise ratio of low-dose CT image using wavelet transform. Int J Comput Sci Eng 4:779–787

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldman LW (2007) Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. J Nucl Med Technol 35:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldman LW (2008) Principles of CT: multislice CT. J Nucl Med Technol 36:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu L, Liu X, Leng S, Kofler JM, Ramirez-giraldo JC, Qu M, Christner J, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH (2012) Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. Imaging Med 1:65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zukhi J, Yusob D, Tajuddin AA, Vuanghao L, Zainon R (2017) Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose using gold nanoparticles and other clinical contrast agents in dual-energy Computed Tomography (CT): CT abdomen phantom. IOP Conf Ser J Phys Conf Ser 851

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bongers MN, Schabel C, Krauss B, Claussen CD, Nikolaou K, Thomas C (2017) Potential of gadolinium as contrast material in second generation dual energy computed tomography—An ex vivo phantom study. Clin Imaging 43:74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu X, Mccullough WP, Mecca P, Servaes S (2016) Dual-energy compared to single-energy CT in pediatric imaging: a phantom study for DECT clinical guidance. Pediatr Radiol 46:1671–1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu L, Primak AN, Liu X, Mccollough CH (2009) Image quality optimization and evaluation of linearly mixed images in dual-source, dual-energy CT. Med Phys 36:1019–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Siemens AG (2008) Dual energy CT SOMATOM definition

    Google Scholar 

  19. Primak AN, Mccollough CH, Michael R, Zhang RTRJ, Fletcher JG (2006) Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi—detector row CT. Radiographics. 1785–1795

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from Ministry of Higher Education through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Zainon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zukhi, J., Yusob, D., Tajuddin, A.A., Zainon, R. (2018). Image Quality Evaluation in Contrast Agents Computed Tomography Imaging. In: Zainon, R. (eds) 3rd International Conference on Radiation Safety & Security in Healthcare Services. Lecture Notes in Bioengineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7859-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7859-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7858-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7859-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics