Abstract
Green, clean, sustainable—these three words are frequently used casually to connote some desirable attributes. When claimed for technical systems, however, the monikers of green, clean, and sustainable must be scientifically justified. Unfortunately, this objective of introducing scientific rigor into assessing the greenness or sustainability of technical systems has not been universally accepted or practiced. For energy systems, currently the debate is conspicuously driven by the phenomenon of global warming, which more recently is described as climate change. The nonfossil modes of energy production, delivery and use of solar, wind, hydro, nuclear, or biomass, are uncritically assumed to be green and sustainable in both scientific and popular literature. This should not be the case. This chapter will look at the issues that must be considered while designing energy systems that can be described as sustainable, clean, or green.
To take away today from England her steam engines would be to take away at the same time her coal and iron. It would be to dry up all her sources of wealth, to ruin all on which her prosperity depends, in short, to annihilate that colossal power.
—Sadi Carnot
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Akzo Nobel, C&E News Jan 23, 2017, p. 10.
- 2.
For instance, power density of solid-state lasers is 20 MW/cm2, whereas utility’s high-voltage line carries 100 MW/cm2.
- 3.
Forbes, October 2005, p. 71.
- 4.
Cornell University, http://www.geo.cornell.edu/eas/energy/the_challenges/peak_oil.html.
- 5.
- 6.
Science, 23 October 2009, vol 326, 0516, NGCC represents gas plant.
References
Dunlap R (2015) Sustainable energy. Cengage Learning, Stamford
Kreith F (2014) Principle of sustainable energy systems, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Tester JW, Drake EM, Driscoll MJ, Golay MW, Peters WA (2005) Sustainable energy: choosing among options. MIT Press, Cambridge
Bruntland G (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Huber P, Mills M (2005) The bottomless well. Basic Books, New York
Hall CA, Day JW (2009) Revisiting the limits to growth after peak oil. Am Sci 97:230–237
Hodgson PE (2010) Energy, the environmental, and climate change. Imperial College Press, London
Helm D (2012) The carbon crunch. Yale University Press, New Haven
Moriarty P, Honnery D (2011) Rise of fall of the carbon civilisation. Springer, London
Darwall R (2014) The age of global warming; a history. Interlink Publishing Group Inc., Northampton
Giampietro M, Mayumi K (2009) The biofuel delusion: the fallacy of large-scale agro-biofuel production. Earthscan, Washington, D.C.
Sikdar SK (2009) On aggregating multiple indicators into a single metric for sustainability. Clean Technol Environ Policy 11(2):157–161
Sikdar SK, Sengupta D, Harten P (2012) More on aggregating multiple indicators into a single index for sustainability analyses. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14(5):765–773
Mukherjee R, Sengupta D, Sikdar SK (2013) Parsimonious use of indicators for evaluating sustainability systems with multivariate statistical analysis. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15(4):699–706
Sikdar SK, Sengupta D, Mukherjee R (2016) Measuring progress towards sustainability: a treatise for engineers. Springer, Switzerland
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sikdar, S.K. (2018). Sustainability of Energy Systems: Views from Technology Perspectives. In: De, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., Assadi, M., Mukherjee, D. (eds) Sustainable Energy Technology and Policies. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7188-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7188-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7187-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7188-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)