Skip to main content

Open Platform Orbit Determination Systems Using a Mixture of Orbit Estimator and Orbit Propagator

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Space Science and Communication for Sustainability
  • 570 Accesses

Abstract

This paper describes a flexible orbit determination method that uses a mixture of orbit estimator and orbit propagator with the ability to perform corrections if the ephemeris from GPS, ground track or other method is obtainable. The satellite uses various sensors including Global Positioning Systems (GPS) or trusted orbit propagator in order to obtain the orbital information with the minimum delay and error at the lowest cost. Orbit propagator uses an orbital dynamic model where the analytic form needs to be constantly updated in order to maintain its accuracy and the integrator needs heavy computation but both constitute the error propagation in which the accuracy depends on the complexity and selection of orbital elements. Orbit estimator uses set of sensors data to produce an estimate where the accuracy depends on measurement noise characteristic and the model used. To avoid divergence, a sensible process and measurement noise model are selected. The orbit estimate is derived from an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) while the Variation of Parameters (VOP) is used to propagate from one state to the other. Any obtainable ephemeris will be used as an initial state. The EKF uses the Position and Velocity elements as they possess dynamics that are beneficial to the estimator. The propagator uses the Keplerian elements as it consists of slow varying elements [a, e, i] and fast varying elements [ω, Ω, υ]. The EKF will be more difficult to diverge towards any abrupt disturbance if the slow varying elements from the orbit propagator are blended with the orbital elements produced by the orbit estimator and prevent the estimator from diverging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bate RR, Mueller DD, White JE (1971) Fundamentals of astrodynamics. Dover Publications Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chory M, Hoffman, DP, LeMay JL (1986) Satellite autonomous navigation–status and history. In: Proceeding of IEEE position, location and navigation symposium (Las Vegas, NV). Institute of Electric and Electronic Engineer, New York, pp 110–121

    Google Scholar 

  3. du Plessis JAF (1999) Low earth orbit satellite propagators. Master’s thesis, University of Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  4. Escobal PR (1965) Methods of orbit determinations. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fox SM, Pal PK, Psiaki M (1990) Magnetometer-based autonomous satellite navigation (MAGNAV). Am Astronaut Soc AAS Pap 90–051:369–382

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hosken R, Wertz JR (1995) Microcosm autonomous navigation system on-orbit operation. Am Astronaut Soc AAS Pap 95–074:491–506

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jordaan JJ (1996) An extended Kalman filter observer for autonomous orbit determination. Master’s thesis, University of Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nagarajan N, Bhat MS, Kasturirangan (1991) A novel autonomous orbit determination system using earth sensor (scanner). Acta Astronaut 25(2):77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Primdahl FG, Merayo JM, Brauer P et al (2003) Design, calibration, and testing of precise magnetometers. In: Proceedings of IEEE sensors 2003 (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37498), vol 1, pp 466–467

    Google Scholar 

  10. Psiaki M, Martel F (1989) Autonomous magnetic navigation for earth orbiting spacecraft. In: Presented at third annual AIAA/USU conference on small satellites, Logan, Utah, USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Psiaki M, Martel R, Pal PK (1990) Three-axis attitude determination via Kalman filtering of magnetometer data. J Guid Control Dyn 13(3):506–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Psiaki M, Huang L, Fox SM (1993) Ground tests of magnetometer-based autonomous navigation (MAGNAV) for low earth orbiting spacecraft. J Guid Control Dyn 16(1):206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Psiaki M (1995) Autonomous orbit and magnetic field determination using magnetometer and star sensor data. J Guid Control Dyn 8(3):584–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanusi H, du Plessis JJ (2000) Investigations of using epoch time in correction of geomagnetic models in estimating orbit for low earth equatorial orbit satellites. In: Presented at 2nd international conference on advances in strategic technologies, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shorshi G, Bar-Itzhack IY (1995) Satellite autonomous navigation based on magnetic field measurements. J Guid Control Dyn 18(4):843–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tai F, Noerdlinger PD (1989) A low-cost autonomous navigation system. Am Astronaut Soc AAS Pap 89–001:3–23

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vallado DA (1997) Fundamentals of astrodynamics and applications. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Wertz JR, Cloots JL, Collins JT et al (2000) Autonomous orbit control: initial flight results from UoSAT-12. In: Presented at 23rd annual aas guidance and control conference, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wiegand M (1996) Autonomous satellite navigation via Kalman filtering of magnetometer data. Acta Astronaut 38(4–8):395–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilmi Sanusi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

$${\mathbf{f}}_{d} = \frac{1}{2}\frac{{C_{D} A}}{m}\rho v_{rel}^{2} \frac{{\vec{v}_{rel} }}{{v_{rel} }}$$

where

\(C_{D}\) :

is the coefficient of drag. A dimensionless coefficient that can be adjusted to suit the result of the orbit, which depends on the shape of the satellite and materials used. A crude approximation, \(C_{D} = 2\) for initial orbit determination. Usually \(2 \le C_{D} \le 2.3\)

A :

is the effective area of the satellite normal to velocity vector

m :

is the mass of the satellite

ρ :

is atmospheric density

\(\vec{v}_{rel}\) :

is the relative velocity vector of the satellite to the atmosphere

\(v_{rel}\) :

is the magnitude of the velocity vector

The perturbation due to geopotential is given by:

$${\text{f}}_{g} = \Delta \frac{GM}{r}\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty } {\sum\limits_{m = 0}^{n} {\frac{{R_{{}}^{n} }}{{r^{n} }}\overline{P}_{nm} \sin \,(\phi )\left( {\overline{C}_{nm} \cos m\lambda + \overline{S}_{nm} \sin m\lambda } \right)} }$$

where

P nm :

is the Legendre polynomial

C nm and S nm :

are the geopotential coefficient with degree n and order m, and the detail can be represented as

$${\text{f}}_{tb} = \mu_{M} \cdot \left( {\frac{{\vec{s} - \vec{r}}}{{\left| {\vec{s} - \vec{r}} \right|^{3} }}} \right) - \mu_{earth} \frac{{\vec{r}}}{{\left| {\vec{r}} \right|^{3} }}$$

where the mass of the satellite is negligible compared to earth and third body and

μ M :

is the gravitational constant due to body M

s :

is the geocentric coordinate of body M

r :

is the geocentric coordinate of the satellite

$${\text{f}}_{SRP} = - \frac{{P_{SR} c_{R} A_{ \oplus } }}{m}\frac{{\vec{r}}}{{\left| {\vec{r}} \right|}}$$

where

r :

is the radius of the satellite from the Earth

m :

is the mass of the satellite

c R 1 + ε :

is the reflective coefficient (dependent on materials). \(1.2 \le c_{R} \le 1.8\)

\(A_{ \oplus }\) :

is the area perpendicular to the sun or the acceleration can be expressed as

$${\text{f}}_{ERP} = \sum {C_{R} \left( {v_{j} a_{j} \cos \theta_{j}^{E} + \frac{1}{4}\varepsilon_{j} } \right)P_{SR} \frac{A}{m}\cos \theta_{j}^{S} \frac{{dA_{j} }}{{\pi r_{j}^{2} }}e_{j} }$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sanusi, H., Suparta, W. (2018). Open Platform Orbit Determination Systems Using a Mixture of Orbit Estimator and Orbit Propagator. In: Suparta, W., Abdullah, M., Ismail, M. (eds) Space Science and Communication for Sustainability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6574-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6574-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6573-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6574-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics