Skip to main content

Embedded and Embodied Auctors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beyond Leadership

Part of the book series: Educational Leadership Theory ((ELT))

  • 1668 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, and section, I explicitly develop the relational extensions that constitute the relational approach to scholarship that I am advancing. Following Pierpaolo Donati, I mobilize the label auctor—meaning she/he who generates. Orthodox labels such as “agent”, with its assumed agency, and “actor”, she/he who acts upon fail to adequately weave spatio-temporal conditions and organizing activity relationally as they are built upon substantialist foundations. The specific argument of this chapter is that the centrality of organizing in the social world creates an ontological complicity in researchers (and others) that makes it difficult to epistemologically break from ordinary language. Drawing on a long line of argument, there are two aspects involved in developing my claims: (i) the constructedness of knowledge and (ii) the construction of a specific scientific focus of inquiry. Both highlight the need for analysis which shows—constructs—the relations of contemporary spatio-temporal conditions and our understanding of organizing activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apple, M. W. (2017). Dialogue, field, and power. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(3), 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G. (1984[1934]). The new scientific spirit (P.A. Heelan, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. [Originally published as Le nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris: Presses Universitaries de France].

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1988[1984]). Homo academicus (P. Collier, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press. [Originally published as Homo academicus. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2000[1997]). Pascalian meditations (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press. [Originally published as Méditations pascaliennes (Paris: Éditions du Seuil)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. Chamboredon, J.-C., & Passeron, J.,-C. (1991[1968]). The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries (R. Nice, Trans.). Berlin: Walter de Guyter. [Originally published as Le métier de sociologue: Préalables épistémologiques. Paris: Mouton].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992[1992]). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. [Originally published as Résponses: Pour une anthropologie reflexive (Paris: Seuil)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., et al. (1999[1993]). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (P. Parkhurst Ferguson, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press. [Originally published as La misere du monde (Paris: Éditions du Seuil)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1942). The influence of language upon the development of scientific thought. The Journal of Philosophy, 33(12), 309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherkowski, S., Currie, R., & Hilton, S. (2012). Who should rank our journals … and based on what? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(2), 206–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. (2015). Manifesto for a critical realist relational sociology. International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 25(1), 86–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eacott, S. (2015). Problematizing the intellectual gaze of the educational administration scholar. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 312–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eacott, S. (2017). A social epistemology for educational administration and leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(3), 196–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. W. (1986). Some principles of postpositivistic philosophy of science. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, T. B. (1973). Organizations as social inventions. Paper Presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, T.B. (1974). Theory in the study of organizations and administrative structures: A new perspective. Paper Presented at the Third International Intervisitation Program on Educational Administration, Bristol, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, T. B., & Ribbins, P. (Eds.). (1993). Greenfield on educational administration: Towards a humane science. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2010). Leadership: Its genealogy, configuration and trajectory. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 42(4), 405–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. (2008). Leadership: a categorical mistake? Human Relations, 61(6), 763–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, G. S. (1954). Heraclitus: The cosmic fragments. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcovich, M. (1967). Heraclitus. Mérida, Venezuela: University of the Andes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, A., & Game, A. (2015). What is a social relation? An apprenticeship in sociological imagination. North Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Scholarly Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, C. (2013). Radical relationism: A proposal. In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 187–207). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, K. (1916). Parmenides und die geschichte der griechischen philosophie. Bonn, Germany: Friendrich Cohen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riveros, A., & Newton, P. (2016). Ontological issues in educational administration: The ontological status of educational organizations. In M.A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–5). doi:10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_284-1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Eacott .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eacott, S. (2018). Embedded and Embodied Auctors . In: Beyond Leadership. Educational Leadership Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6568-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6568-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6567-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6568-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics