Abstract
Southeast Asia comprises a region often associated in the media with the liberal use of the death penalty, particularly for drug-related offences. In recent years, however, trends suggest slightly more leniency, through moratoriums and legal reform (UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights 2013a, b). The death penalty in Southeast Asia has featured in deliberations in the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process of the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council (HRC). UN member states throughout the region are on the precipice of a third cycle of UPR, set to begin in 2017. Judging by the emphasis on the death penalty in the previous two UPRs, it is likely that the topic will again be a focus of attention at the third review and these member states will be urged to step further towards abolishment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Evidenced from the Misuse of Drugs (Amendment) Act 2012 and Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2012 on 14 November 2012 and changes to the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed). These limited situations may include those where murder is not intentional and drug possession within certain (low) thresholds.
- 2.
These NGOs included 56 NGOs: All PJ Residents’ Association Coalition (APAC) (a coalition of 9 residents’ associations), All Women’s Action Society (AWAM), Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ), Centre for Orang Asli Concerns (COAC), Centre for Public Policy Studies (CPPS), Civil Rights Committee of the Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall, Community Action Network (CAN), Education and Research Association for Consumers, Malaysia (ERA Consumer), Health Equity Initiative, Human Rights Committee of the Malaysian Medical Association, Independent Living and Training Centre (ILTC), Indigenous and Peasant Movement Sarawak (Panggau), International Association for Peace (IAP), Indian Malaysian Active Generation (IMAGE), Knowledge and Rights with Young People through Safer Spaces (KRYSS), Malaysian Animal-Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and Elderly Association (Pet Positive), Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) (a coalition of 9 religious organisations), Malaysian Trade Union Congress (MTUC), Malaysian Youth and Students Democratic Movement (DEMA), Myanmar Ethnic Rohingya Human Rights Organisation Malaysia (MEHROM), Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor (PSWS), Persatuan Masyarakat Selangor and Wilayah Persekutuan (PERMAS), Persatuan Guru-guru Tadika (PGGT), Positive Malaysian Treatment Access & Advocacy Group (MTAAG+), Protect and Save the Children (PS the Children), PT Foundation, Pusat Jagaan Nur Salam, Pusat Komunikasi Masyarakat (KOMAS), Research for Social Advancement (REFSA), Sarawak Dayak Iban Association (SADIA), Sisters in Islam (SIS), Tenaganita, United Dayak Islamic Brotherhood, Sarawak, Women’s Aid Organisation (WAO), Women’s Centre for Change, Penang (WCC), Writers’ Alliance for Media Independence (WAMI), Youth for Change (Y4C), Youth Section of the Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall.
- 3.
Joint submission No. 1 by 54 organisations: [Pusat Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER), Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM), Education and Research Association for Consumers, Malaysia (ERA Consumer), All Petaling Jaya, Selangor Residents’ Association (APAC), All Women’s Action Society (AWAM), Amnesty International, Malaysia, ASEAN Institute for Early Childhood Development, Association of Women’s Lawyers (AWL), Association of Women with Disabilities Malaysia, Coalition to Abolish Modern Day Slavery in Asia (CAMSA), Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ), Childline Malaysia, Christian Federation Malaysia, Community Action Network (CAN), Centre for Rights of Indigenous Peoples of Sarawak (CRIPS), Dignity International, Foreign Spouses Support Group, Good Shepherd Welfare Centre, Health Equity Initiatives, Jaringan Kampung Orang Asli Semenanjung Malaysia (JKOASM), Jaringan Rakyat Tertindas (JERIT), Justice For Sisters, Pusat Komunikasi Selangor (KOMAS), Knowledge and Rights with Young people through Safer Spaces (KRYSS), KLSCAH Civil Rights Committee, Land Empowerment Animals People (LEAP), Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET), Malaysian Child Resource Institute (MCRI), Malaysian Physicians for Social Responsibility, Malaysia Youth & Student Democratic Movement (DEMA), Migration Working Group (MWG), PANGGAU, Persatuan Masyarakat Selangor dan Kuala Lumpur (PERMAS), PS The Children, PT Foundation, People’s Service Organisation (PSO), Seksualiti Merdeka, Perak Women for 13 Women Society, Persatuan Guru-Guru Tadika Semenanjung Malaysia (PGGT), Persatuan Komuniti Prihatin Selangor dan Kuala Lumpur, Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor, Rainbow Genders Society, Sabah Women’s Action-Resource Group (SAWO), Southeast Asian Centre for e-Media (SEACem), Sinui Pai Nanek Sengik (SPNS), SIS Forum (Malaysia) Bhd (SIS), Tenaganita, Voice of the Children (VOC), Writers’ Alliance for Media Independence (WAMI), Women’s Aid Organisation (WAO), Women’s Centre for Change, Penang (WCC), Yayasan Chow Kit, Young Buddhist Association, Youth Section, Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall, Youth Section].
- 4.
Penal Code of Malaysia, art. 307(2), 396, 194 and 305, 1936, as amended by Act 574 of 2006.; Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act of Malaysia, art. 3(A), 1971.
- 5.
Dangerous Drugs Act of Malaysia, art. 39(B), 1952, revised 1980.
- 6.
Penal Code of Malaysia, 1936, as amended by Act 574 of 2006; Dangerous Drugs Act of Malaysia, art. 39(B), 1952, revised 1980
- 7.
Government of Myanmar (2016) ‘Burma Penal Code’, art. 302, No. 45 of 1860, 1 May 1861.
- 8.
Myanmar Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Law, arts. 20, 22–23, No. 1 of 1993; Myanmar Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Law, arts. 20, 22–23, 26, No. 1 of 1993.
- 9.
Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (1999 Rev. Ed.), Article 9(1).
- 10.
Marked by Misuse of Drugs (Amendment) Act 2012 and Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2012 on 14 November 2012 and changes to the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed).
- 11.
Amnesty International, for instance, has led a campaign to convince Philippines lawmakers to vote against the death penalty. See https://www.amnesty.org/en/get-involved/take-action/stop-reintroduction-of-death-penalty-philippines/.
References
Amnesty International. 2004. Singapore: The Death Penalty—A Hidden Toll of Executions, ASA 36/001/2004.
Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network. 2016. Brunei-Update on Shariah Penal Code, at: https://adpan.org/2016/06/09/brunei-update-on-shariah-penal-code-and-death-penalty.
ASEAN People’s Forum. 2015. Press Release: ASEAN Governments Urged to Abolish Death Penalty. ASEAN Civil Society Conference/ASEAN People’s Forum, at http://aseanpeople.org/asean-governments-urged-to-abolish-death-penalty/.
Bünte, Marco, and Bjorn Dressel, eds. 2016. Politics and Constitutions in Southeast Asia. Oxford: Routledge.
Chauville, Roland. 2016. Between the Cycles: The UPR’s Achievements and Opportunities. International Service for Human Rights, at: https://www.ishr.ch/news/between-cycles-uprs-achievements-and-opportunities.
Chin, Chua Sian. 1977. Singapore Parliamentary Debates, May 27: 37, col. 34.
Constitution of the Republic of Singapore. 1999. Rev. ed., Art. 9(1).
Conte, Alex. 2011. Reflections and Challenges: Entering into the Second Cycle of the Universal Periodic Review Mechanism. New Zealand Yearbook of International Law 9 (1): 187.
Cornell Law School. 2011. Death Penalty Database: Brunei. Cornell Centre on the Death Penalty Worldwide, at: http://www.deathpenaltyworldwide.org/country-search-post.cfm?country=Brunei.
———. 2015. Death Penalty Database: Myanmar. Cornell Centre on the Death Penalty Worldwide, at: https://www.deathpenaltyworldwide.org/country-search-post.cfm?country=Myanmar.
Dangerous Drugs Act of Malaysia, Article 39(B), 1952, revised 1980.
Death Penalty Worldwide. 2015. Brunei Crimes and Offenders Punishable by Death, at: https://www.deathpenaltyworldwide.org/country-search-post.cfm?country=Brunei.
Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act of Malaysia, Article 3(A), 1971.
Government of Myanmar. 2016. Burma Penal Code, art. 302, No. 45 of 1860, May 1, 1861.
Hickey, Emma. 2013. The UN’s Universal Periodic Review, Is It Adding Value and Improving the Human Rights Situation on the Ground? ICL Journal 7 (24): 24.
Holmes, Oliver. 2016. Malaysia Hangs Three Men for Murder in ‘Secretive’ Execution. The Guardian, March 25, at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/25/malaysia-hangs-three-men-for-in-secretive-execution.
Hood, Rodger. 2006. The Enigma of the ‘Most Serious Offences. New York University Centre for Human Rights and Global Justice Working Paper, Extrajudicial Executions Series 9(4).
Hor, Michael. 2001. Misuse of Drugs and Aberrations in the Criminal Law. Singapore Law Review 13: 54.
———. 2004. The Death Penalty in Singapore and International Law. Singapore Year Book of International Law 8: 105.
Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Myanmar, 20 November 2015, A/HRC/31/13.
Human Rights Watch. 2016. Philippines: Don’t Reinstate Death Penalty. Human Rights Watch News, at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/12/03/philippines-dont-reinstate-death-penalty.
International Service for Human Rights. 2013. Universal Periodic Review. Human Rights Monitor Quarterly 1 (27): 27.
Leechaianan, Yingyos, and Dennis R. Longmire. 2013. The Use of the Death Penalty for Drug Trafficking in the United States, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand: A Comparative Legal Analysis. Laws 2(2), at: http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/2/2/115.
McMahon, Edward R. 2012. The Universal Periodic Review: A Work in Progress: An Evaluation of the First Cycle of the New UPR Mechanism of the United Nations Human Rights Council. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, International Policy Analysis/Dialogue on Globalization Series, September, at: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/genf/09297.pdf.
Morrison, John, and Liam Riordan. 2015. The Implacable Ritual: A Study Examining the Inertia of Death Penalty Abolition Within the Universal Periodic Review, Despite Tacit Support and Global Trends. Master’s Thesis in Public International Law, Universiteit Leiden.
Myanmar Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Law, Articles 20, 22–23, 26, No. 1 of 1993.
Penal Code of Malaysia 1936 as amended by Act 574 of 2006.
Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR. 1989. Abolition of the Death Penalty, New York: United Nations, December 15, Treaty Series, 1642(414).
Singapore Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed).
Singapore Government. 2007. The Singapore Government’s Response to Amnesty International’s Report Singapore: The Death Penalty—A Hidden Toll of Executions. Ministry of Home Affairs, at http://www.mha.gov.sg/basic_content.aspx?pageid=74.
Singapore Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2016. MFA Press Statement: Singapore’s Participation in the Second Cycle of the Universal Periodic Review, UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, January 27, at: https://www.mfa.gov.sg/content/mfa/media_centre/press_room/pr/2016/201601/press_20180128_01.html.
Singapore Misuse of Drugs (Amendment) Act. 2012.
Singapore Misuse of Drugs Act. 2007. Sections 15-33(A), Second Schedule, Cap. 185, 2008 Rev. Ed., amended by S 402/2007.
Singapore Penal Code (Amendment) Act. 2012.
Sweeney, Gareth, and Yuri Saito. 2009. NGO Assessment of the New Mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council. Human Rights Law Review 9 (2): 218.
Think Centre. 2016. Oral Statement Delivered on Behalf of FORUM-ASIA at the 24th June 2016 Universal Periodic Review Plenary on Singapore. Think Centre, at: http://www.thinkcentre.org/article.php?id=3265.
UN General Assembly. 2012. Interim Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture, A/67/279, 33.
———. 2013. Participation by All Crucial for Successful Universal Periodic Review of National Records, Third Committee Told, November 13, GA/SHC/4089. https://www.un.org/press/en/2013/gashc4089.doc.htm.
UN Human Rights Council. 2007. Institution-Building of the United Nations Human Rights Council, Annex to Resolution A/Res?5/1.
———. 2008. Summary Prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, in Accordance with Paragraph 15(c) of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1 – Malaysia, October 27, A/HRC/WG.6/4/MYS/3.
———. 2009. Summary Prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, in Accordance with Paragraph 15(c) of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1 – Brunei Darussalam, July 21, A/HRC/WG.6/6/BRN/3.
———. 2010. Summary Prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, in Accordance with Paragraph 15(c) of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1 – Myanmar, October 18, A/HRC/WG.6/10/MMR/3.
———. 2011a. Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review – Myanmar, March 24, A/HRC/17/9.
———. 2011b. Summary Prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Accordance with Paragraph 15 (b) of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1 and Paragraph 5 of the Annex to Council Resolution 16/21 – Singapore, February 21, A/HRC/WG.6/11/SGP/3.
———. 2013. Summary Prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Accordance with Paragraph 15 (b) of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1 and Paragraph 5 of the Annex to Council Resolution 16/21 – Malaysia, July 25, A/HRC/WG.6/17/MYS/3.
———. 2014. Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review – Brunei Darussalam, July 7, A/HRC/27/11.
———. 2015a. Summary Prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Accordance with Paragraph 15 (b) of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1 and paragraph 5 of the Annex to Council Resolution 16/21 – Myanmar, August 28, A/HRC/WG.6/23/MMR/3.
———. 2015b. Summary Prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Accordance with Paragraph 15 (b) of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1 and Paragraph 5 of the Annex to Council Resolution 16/21 – Singapore, November 6, A/HRC/WG.6/24/SGP/3.
———. 2015c. Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review— Myanmar, 20 November, A/HRC/31/13.
UN News Centre. 2014. UN Rights Office Praises Myanmar for Commuting all Death Sentences. UN News Centre, at: http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=46904#.V6q9UiN962x.
———. 2015. No Evidence Death Penalty Deters Any Crime, Senior UN Official Tells Rights Council. UN News Centre, at: http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=50238.
UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2008. Annex, Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1, 2008, HRC/WG.6/4/MYS/3.
———. 2013a. Human Rights Council Resolution, A/HRC/WG.6/17/MYS/1, 45.
———. 2013b. Moving Away from the Death Penalty: Lessons in South East Asia, at: http://bangkok.ohchr.org/files/Moving%20away%20from%20the%20Death%20Penalty-English%20for%20Website.pdf.
———. 2014. UN Rights Office Praises Myanmar for Commuting All Death Sentences. UN News Centre, at: http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=46904#.V6q9UiN962x.
United States Department of State. 2015. Singapore Human Rights Report. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organisation/253009.pdf.
UPR Info. 2014. Beyond Promises: The Impact of the UPR on the Ground, at: https://www.upr-info.org/sites/default/files/general-document/pdf/2014_beyond_promises.pdf.
———. 2016. Database of UPR Recommendations, at: https://www.upr-info.org/database/.
World Coalition Against the Death Penalty. 2016a. Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, at http://www.worldcoalition.org/Anti-Death-Penalty-Asia-NetworkADPAN.html.
———. 2016b. Worldwide Database: Myanmar, at http://www.worldcoalition.org/Myanmar.
Yu Ji. 2016. Nancy: Malaysia One Step Closer to Amending Death Penalty. The Star Newspaper, June 22, at: http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/06/22/nancy-malaysia-one-step-closer-to-abolishing-death-penalty/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ravi, M. (2018). The Abolition of the Death Penalty in Southeast Asia: The Arduous March Forward. In: Gomez, J., Ramcharan, R. (eds) The Universal Periodic Review of Southeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6226-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6226-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6225-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6226-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)