Skip to main content

Critical Impact Factors Affecting Carbon Emission: Evidence from STIRPAT Model with Panel Data Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate
  • 3757 Accesses

Abstract

With the global warming challenge, carbon emission reduction is appreciated as the basic policy for each country. This paper used the STIRPAT model with analyzing the impact of population, affluence and technology on the total carbon emission of 125 countries of different income levels over the period of 1990–2011. The empirical results indicate that the key impact factor at high-income level is technology, followed by population and affluence. The impact factor affluence has the strongest influence on carbon emission at upper- and lower-middle levels, however the factor population has the least impact. As to the low-income level, the key impact factor is affluence followed by population and technology. The conclusions from this paper help the policy makers to design effective policies to reduce the carbon emission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbostancı E, Türüt-Aşık S, Tunç Gİ (2009) The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy 37(3):861–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloumi M, Alshehry AS (2016) The impact of urbanization on energy intensity in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 8(4):375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brizga J, Feng K, Hubacek K (2013) Drivers of CO2 emissions in the former Soviet Union: a country level IPAT analysis from 1990 to 2010. Energy 59:743–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Lu W (2017) Identifying factors influencing demolition waste generation in Hong Kong. J Clean Prod 141:799–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DietzT R (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. HumanEcolRev 2:277

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding S, Wen Z-M (2014) Study on influential factors of carbon emissions in Yangtze River delta—based on IPAT improved model. Technoeconomics Manage Res 9:021

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong J, Ma Y, Sun H (2016) From pilot to the national emissions trading scheme in China: international practice and domestic experiences. Sustain 8(6):522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Sun T, Dai H (2016) Effect of population structure change on carbon emission in China. Sustainability 8(3):225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J econometrics 115(1):53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J econometrics 90(1):1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J econometrics 108(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Chen X, Peng Y, Shen L (2015) Benchmarking construction waste management performance using big data. Resour Conserv Recycl 105:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Chen X, Ho DC, Wang H (2016) Analysis of the construction waste management performance in Hong Kong: the public and private sectors compared using big data. J Clean Prod 112:521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuhashi K, Ariga T (2016) Estimation of passenger car CO2 emissions with urban population density scenarios for low carbon transportation in Japan. IATSS Res 39(2):117–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng H, Tan X, Li Y, Hu L (2016) Economic growth, foreign direct investment and CO2 emissions in China: a panel granger causality analysis. Sustain 8(3):233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin J, Bai X, Xia L (2015) Sustainable trade credit and replenishment policies under the cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations. Sustainability 7(12):16340–16361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Sbia R, Bibi S (2015) Does energy intensity contribute to CO2 emissions? A trivariate analysis in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 50:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang W, Pei G, Walsh C, Meng M, Meng X (2016) Have market-oriented reforms decoupled China’s CO2 emissions from total electricity generation? Empir Anal Sustain 8(5):468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Shuai C, Jiao L, Tan Y, Song X (2016) A global perspective on the sustainable performance of urbanization. Sustainability 8(8):783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Yan H, Zhang X, Shuai C (2017) Experience mining based innovative method for promoting urban sustainability. J Cleaner Prod

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuai C, Shen L, Jiao L, Wu Y, Tan Y (2017a) Identifying key impact factors on carbon emission: evidences from panel and time-series data of 125 countries from 1990 to 2011. Appl Energy 187:310–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuai C, Jiao L, Song X, Shen L (2017) Decoupling analysis on the relationship between economic development and environment degradation in China. In: Proceedings of the 20th international symposium on advancement of construction management and real estate, Springer, Singapore, pp 1207–1216

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian L, Ding Z, Wang Y, Duan H, Wang S, Tang J, Wang XE (2016) Analysis of the driving factors and contributions to carbon emissions of energy consumption from the perspective of the peak volume and time based on leap. Sustainability 8(6):513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Wu W, Zhu B, Wei Y (2013) Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Appl Energy 106:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R, Zhang J, Bao Y, Zhang F (2016) Geographical detector model for influencing factors of industrial sector carbon dioxide emissions in inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability 8:149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Chen J, Song X, Shen L (2017) Relationship between the energy consumption for urban residential buildings and residents’ living standards—a case study of the four municipalities in China. In: Proceedings of the 20th international symposium on advancement of construction management and real estate, Springer, Singapore, pp 1229–1238

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Ma Y, Ye B, Chen ZM, Xiong L (2016) Feasibility analyses of developing low carbon city with hybrid energy systems in China: the case of Shenzhen. Sustainability 8(5):452

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 15BJY038 and 15AZD025).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Y. Shuai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shuai, C.Y., Song, X.N., Li, S.P. (2018). Critical Impact Factors Affecting Carbon Emission: Evidence from STIRPAT Model with Panel Data Analysis. In: Chau, K., Chan, I., Lu, W., Webster, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_52

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics