Skip to main content

Abstract

The globalized construction market has created strong completion among industry players. To remain competitive, the building developers are constantly in search of novel business models. As a result, diverse real estate business models have emerged and research into business model construct has also intensified. Despite the growing academic interest in the area, no commonly accepted definition and construct of real estate business models have yet been established. Also, there is a lack of quantitative studies of the real estate business models in China. The aim of this paper is thus to (1) identify the variables for studying the real estate business model; and (2) reveal the main streams of real estate business model in China. The research was carried out through the combination of a two-step cluster analysis of 117 real estate companies in China. The business model clusters were revealed using a number of variables including target customer, product, market orientation, finance, collaboration network, core capability and revenue. Five clusters of these companies were revealed: (1) commercial property model; (2) government-dominant model; (3) management-dominant model; (4) resource-dominant model; and (5) domestic leading model. The findings should help with understanding the complex profiles of real estate business models and support cross-context learning of the practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brege S, Stehn L, Nord T (2014) Business models in industrialized building of multi-storey houses. Constr Manage Econ 32(1):208–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (1996). Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strateg Leadersh 35(16):12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Doganova L, Eyquem-Renault M (2009) What do business models do?: innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Res Policy 38:1559–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley C, Raftery AE (1998) How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. Comput J 41(8):578–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G (1998) The challenge today:changing the rules of the game. Bus Strateg Rev 9(9):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard business review on business model innovation (2010) Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Christensen CM, Kagermann H (2008a) Reinventing your business model. Harvard Bus Rev 86(12):50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Christensen CM, Kagermann H (2008b) Reinventing your business model. Harvard Bus Rev 87(12):52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Magretta J (2002) Why business model matter. Harvard Bus Rev 80(5):86–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GA (2004) Darwin and the demon: innovating within established enterprises. Harvard Bus Rev 82(7):86–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovans A (2015) What is a business model? Harvard Bus Rev 27:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan W, Goodier C (2012) House-building business models and off-site construction take-up. J Archit Eng 18:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw PJ (1987) Shilhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math 20:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43:172–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas R (2001) Business value analysis: coping with unruly uncertainty. Strateg Leadersh, 29(2):16–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmers P (1998) Business models for electronic markets. Electron Markets 8:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voelpel S, Leibold M, Tekie E (2004) The wheel of business model to leapfrog competitors. J Change Manage 4(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng JY (2004) Mesoscopic business model: nano research of management areas. China Econ Stud 01:34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan L (2007) Reconstruction of business model. China Ind Econ (6):72–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Zhou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, K.J., Zhou, Y., Shrestha, A., Liu, G.W. (2018). A Cluster Analysis of Real Estate Business Models in China. In: Chau, K., Chan, I., Lu, W., Webster, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics