Abstract
This study uses survey data to examine empirically the effect of the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011 on attitudes towards politics. Drawing upon Terror Management Theory, we hypothesize that the earthquake triggered a fear of death in people, thus tilting their attitudes more conservative. Terror Management Theory postulates that exposure to a fear of death activates a psychological self-defense mechanism in people, who try to escape this fear by, for example, excessively embracing culture and building up their own egos. This article examines whether the fear of death triggered by the earthquake caused people in the disaster areas to become more conservative through an excessive embrace of political culture. To test this hypothesis, we rely on the Japanese Election Study IV, which provides panel data derived before and after the earthquake. Using this data, we empirically analyze changes in values, liberal–conservative ideology, materialism, and patriotism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Tōhoku region consists of six prefectures: Akita, Aomori, Fukushima, Iwate, Miyagi, and Yamagata.
- 2.
A Report from the Japanese National Police Agency. This report shows the damage from the earthquake as of December 2016. (https://www.npa.go.jp/archive/keibi/biki/higaijokyo.pdf) (Access date: March 28, 2017).
- 3.
See, for example, “Praises for the Japanese people during the disaster from around the world”. (https://matome.naver.jp/odai/2130037606051360301) (Access date: 2 Jan. 2017).
- 4.
SNS has both positive and negative implications, such as the spreading of incorrect information and false rumors.
- 5.
Asahi Shimbun (July 11, 2011).
- 6.
For example, terrorism and natural disaster have different definitions.
- 7.
For example, the meaning of a war depends on the history of the region wherein it occurs, for example, whether the war was caused by a conflict over religion or natural resources.
- 8.
NHK is abbreviation of Nihon Hōsō Kyōkai. It is Japan’s public broadcasting organization.
- 9.
Henceforth, ontological fear will be referred to as “menace to being”.
- 10.
In addition, Wakimoto (2012, Chap. 4) explains the cognitive process by which the defense of cultural worldviews appears at the macro level.
- 11.
Iwate, Miyagi, Fukushima, and Ibaraki.
- 12.
However, this might not be a problem because the sample size in a given region is relatively small.
- 13.
One example can be seen in the Japan General Social Survey, which asked respondents about the death of family members and people close to them.
- 14.
Tamayama was a village located in Iwate prefecture that was merged with Morioka in 2005.
- 15.
Some cities consist of several electoral districts: Aoba and Taihaku ward in Sendai as Tōhōku District 1, and Miyagino, Wakabayashi, and Izumi ward in Sendai as Tōhōku District 2. If the wards are part of a designated city (Seirei-shitei-toshi), the FDMA report can be used to determine the number of deaths.
- 16.
For details of this method, see Appendix.
- 17.
For details of these questions, see Appendix.
- 18.
However, we excluded the first question since it concerns political attitude.
- 19.
In this study, we use teffects and the ipw package in Stata 14.
- 20.
There are various methods of measuring political ideology (Kabashima and Takenaka 2012) This study measured political ideology using an 11-point Likert scale. However, political ideology can also be measured by composite variables using issue positions. Although we did not consider the details of ideology, it can be helpful to use alternative measurements.
References
Abadie, Alberto, and Guido W. Imbens. 2016. Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 84 (2): 781–807.
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke Jörn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Arai, Kiichiro, and Yasuhiro Izumikawa. 2014. How much positive are Japanese toward military force? experiment using a simulation data of emergency situation in Senkaku Islands (Nihonjin-ha-donoteido-buryokukoushi-ni-maemuki-nanoka? Senkakushoto-yuuji-simulation-wo-mochiita-sentaku-jittken). Leviathan 28–47. [in Japanese].
Chatagnier, J. Tyson. 2012. The effect of trust in government on rallies ’round the flag. Journal of Peace Research 49(sep): 631–645.
Foyle, Douglas C. 2004. Leading the public to war? the influence of American public opinion on the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 16(sep): 269–294.
Furukawa, Miho. 2015. Tōhōku Shock, Doctrine [in Japanese]. Iwanami.
Greenberg, Jeff, Sheldon Solomon, and Tom Pyszczynski. 1997. Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 29: 61–139.
Hamamoto, Shinsuke. 2015. A Study of policy research council in democratic party of Japan (Minshuto-seisaku-chosakai-no-kenkyu). [in Japanese]. In A Requirement for Governance: Government Management and Intra-party Governance of Democratic Party of Japan (Touchi-no-jyoken—Minshuto-ni-miru-seikenunei-to-tounaitouchi), ed. Yukio Maeda, and Hidetaka Tsutsumi. Chikurashobo 147–180. [in Japanese]
Hayashi, Toshihiko. 2013. After Disappearance of Disaster Utopia (= Saigai-yutopia-ga-kieta-ato). Gakujyutu-no-dōkō. [in Japanese].
Hoshino, Takahiro. 2009. Statistical Science of Observational Data—Causal Inference, Selection Bias, and Data Fusion (= Chōsa-kansatsu-data-no-tōkei-kagaku—inga-suiron, sentaku-bias, data-yūgō). Iwanami. [in Japanese].
Ibish, Hussein, and Anne Stewart. 2003. Report on Hate Crimes and Discrimination Against Arab Americans: The Post-September 11 Backlash, September 11, 2001 - October 11, 2002. Washington, DC: American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.
Iida, Takeshi. 2016. Voters’ Risk Attitudes and Voting Behavio (=Yūkensha-no-risk-taido-to-tōhyōkōdō). Bokutakusha. [in Japanese].
Ikeda, Kenichi, and Yuki Yasuda. 2015. Panel survey of information behavior in three damaged prefectures 2011–2012 (= Hisai-sanken-jyōhō-kōdō-panel-chōsa 2011–2012). In Information Media and Network from the View of the Disaster(= Shinsai-kara-mieru-jyōhō-media-to-network), ed. Kenichi Ikeda. Tōyōkeizai-shimbunsha, 151–210. [in Japanese].
Inamasu, Kazunori, and Yasufumi Shibanai. 2015. Analysis of information environment using text data (= Text-data-wo-mochiita-shinsaigo-no-jyōhō-no-bunseki). In Information Media and Network from the View of the Disaster(= Shinsai-kara-mieru-jyōhō-media-to-network), ed. Kenichi Ikeda. Tōyōkeizai-shimbunsha, 47–84. [in Japanese].
Kabashima, Ikuo, and Yoshihiko Takenaka. 1996. Ideology in Contemporary Japan (= Gendai-nihonjin-no-ideology). Tokyo University Press. [in Japanese].
Kabashima, Ikuo, and Yoshihiko Takenaka. 2012. Ideology. Tokyo University Press. [in Japanese].
Kohara, Takaharu, and Hiroaki Inatsugu, eds. 2015. Municipality Governance after Disaster (= Shinsaigo-no-jichitai-governance). Tōyōkeizai-shimbunsha. [in Japanese].
Maeda, Yukio. 2015. Voter’s Evaluation to DPJ government (= minshutō-seiken-ni-taisuru-yūkensha-no-hyōka). In A Requirement for Governance: Government Management and Intra-party Governance of Democratic Party of Japan (Touchi-no-jyoken—Minshuto-ni-miru-seikenunei-to-tounaitouchi), ed. Yukio Maeda, and Hidetaka Tsutsumi. Chikurashobo 291–328. [in Japanese].
Mikuriya, Takashi, ed. 2016. Comparative Policy Analysis of Recovery Process after the Grate Disaster: Kantō, Hanshin, Awaji, the Three Greate Disaster in the East Japan (= Daishinsai-fukkō-katei-no-seisaku-hikaku-bunseki: kantō, hanshin, awaji. higashi-nihon-no-sandai-sinsai-no-kenshō). Minerva. [in Japanese].
Murase, Yoichi. 2013. Determinants to anxiety and amount extent of damage after the disaster: quantitative analysis of damge and social class in Sendai-Semboku (= Shinsaigo-no-fuankan-to-higai-kingaku-no-kiteiin: higai-to-shakai-kaisō-ni-kansuru-sendai-semboku-chōsa-no-keiryō-bunseki). Senkyō-kenkyū 29 (1): 102–115. [in Japanese].
NHK project for the East Japan Greate disaster. 2013. Record of Testimony: The East Japan Greate Disaster (= shōgen-kiroku-higashi-nihon-daishinsai). NHK Press.
Nishida, Ryosuke. 2016. Media and LDP (Media-to-jimintō). Kadokawa. [in Japanese].
Omura, Hirotaka, and Hanako Omura. 2014. Military conflict and opinion in Japan (Buryoku-shōtotsu-to-nihon-no-yoron-no-hannō). Leviathan. [in Japanese].
Sakaiya, Shiro. 2013. How did the greate disaster change Japanese political attitude and behavior (= Higashi-nihon-daishinsai-wa-nihonjin-no-seiji-isiki-kōdō-wo-dou-kaetaka). Senkyō-kenkyū 29 (1): 57–72. [in Japanese].
Seki, Yuji. 2011. Why Are not Japanese Depressed about Disaster? (Nihonjin-wa-naze-shinsai-ni-hekotarenainoka). PHP Shinshō. [in Japanese].
Sekiya, Naoya. 2012. Anxiety and Information Behavior after the Greate East Japan Disaster (Higasinihon-daisinsaigo-no-fuan-to-jyōhō-kōdō). Jyōhō-no-kagaku-to-gijyutsu. [in Japanese].
Shibanai, Yasufumi. 2015. Panel survey of information behavior in the metropolis 2011-2012 (= Shutoken-jyōhō-kankyō-panel-chōsa 2011–2012). In Information Media and Network from the View of the Disaster(= Shinsai-kara-mieru-jyōhō-media-to-network), ed. Kenichi Ikeda. Tōyōkeizai-shimbunsha pp. 211–228. [in Japanese].
Shibanai, Yasufumi, and Kazunori Inamasu. 2015. Features of newspaper, TV, Yahoo! topics, and blog article among disaster period(=Shinsaiki-no-shimbun-TV-Yahoo! topics-blog-kiji-to-tōkō-no-tokuchō).” In Information Media and Network from the View of the Disaster(= Shinsai-kara-mieru-jyōhō-media-to-network), ed. Kenichi Ikeda. Tōyōkeizai-shimbunsha, 85–106. [in Japanese].
Sobek, David. 2007. Rallying around the podesta: testing diversionary theory across time. Journal of Peace Research 44 (1): 29–45.
Solnit, Rebecca. 2009. A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster. Viking Adult.
Takahashi, Koichi, and Miki Masaki. 2012. How did Japanese change after the East Japan Greate disaster: from survey of disaster prevention, energy, and life attidutes (= higashi-nihon-daishinsai-de-nihonjin-wa-dou-kawattaka: bōsai, energy, seikatsu-ni-kansuru-ishiki-chōsa-kara). Broadcasting Study and Research (= hōsō-kenkyū-to-chōsa) 62(6): 34–44. [in Japanese].
Tsujinaka, Yutaka, ed. 2016. Political Process and Policy (= Seiji-katei-to-seisaku). Tōyōkeizai-shimbunsha. [in Japanese].
Uchida, Yukiko. 2013. Happiness after the greate East Japan Disaster-change of happiness and view of life caused by the disaster (=Higashi-nihon-daisinsaigo-no-kōfuku-shinsai-ga-motarashita-jinseikan-to-kōfukukan-no-henka). Kankyō-kenkyū 172: 83–91. [in Japanese].
Wakimoto, Ryutaro. 2012. Introduction to terror management theory: how does people confront fate of death (Sonzaikyōikanririron-eno-izanai: hito-wa-si-no-unmei-ni-ikani-tachimukauka). Science. [in Japanese].
Zenkyo, Masahiro. 2013. Opinion about neuclear after Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster: empirical analysis of the determinant (= Fukushima-dai-ichi-genpatsu-jiko-go-no-gensiryoku-yoron: sono-kitei-yōin-no-jittshō-bunseki). Senkyō-kenkyū 29 (1): 73–86.
Zenkyo, Masahiro. 2016. Did an agreement of reciprocal support work?: empirical analysis using suvery in damaged municipalities (= saigaiji-sōgo-ōen-kyōtei-wa-kinō-shitaka: hisai-jichitai-survey-wo-mochiita-jitshōi-bunseki). In Research Report of Wide-range Cooperation and Support in Disaster (= saigaiji-no-kōiki-renkei-shien-no-kōsatsu chōsa-hōkokusho), ed. Hyogo Earthquake Memorial 21st Century Research Institute. Hyogo Earthquake Memorial 21st Century Research Institute.
Acknowledgements
The data for this study, “National-wide Longitudinal Survey Study on Voting Behavior in an Age of Political Change” investigated by JES IV workshop (Hiroshi Hirano, Yoshiaki Kobayashi, Kenichi Ikeda, and Masahiro Yamada), was provided by the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archives, Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo. We thank Hirano Hiroshi (Gakushuin University), Yukio Maeda (University of Tokyo), and Kazunori Inamasu (Kwansei Gakuin University) for thoughtful advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Measuring Response Variables
Appendix: Measuring Response Variables
The response variables in this paper were measured using the questionnaires below. These questionnaires are common to Waves 5 and 7.
Cultural Ideology
- Q44:
-
What do you think of the following? Please choose the response that best matches your thinking. The first question is about the proposition that today’s Japanese politicians do not give people much consideration. (Please circle only one choice each for the first through the fifteenth item)
-
1.
Today’s Japanese politicians do not give people much consideration. [excluded from the analysis]
-
2.
I cannot tell how things will change and it does not make any sense to think of the future.
-
3.
People are becoming economically worse off.
-
4.
Considering how things change, I am pessimistic about the future of my children.
-
5.
People are becoming increasingly indifferent to others.
-
6.
It is natural that some are haves and others are have-nots.
-
7.
You should abide by whatever your parents say.
-
8.
Those who break the rules should be severely punished.
-
9.
Leaders should treat their subordinates in a dignified manner.
-
10.
Adolescent girls and boys should, if possible, be educated separately
-
11.
A good educational background and material richness matter in the world.
-
12.
We have much information about political and social issues, but I am at a loss about which is more credible.
-
13.
Honesty does not pay off in the current social situation; the shrewd guys win.
-
14.
Much of what I want to say or think gets rejected by people around me.
-
15.
I am unlikely to realize my dream if I continue to live as I do now.
Partly | Partly | |||||||
Agree | agree | Neither | disagree | Disagree | ||||
1 | \(\cdots \cdots \) | 2 | \(\cdots \cdots \) | 3 | \(\cdots \cdots \) | 4 | \(\cdots \cdots \) | 5 |
The above measurement was reversed.
Political Ideology
- Q43:
-
Regarding the political stance of being conservative or liberal, what is your stance? In the scale, the left end (0) means the most liberal and the right end (10) means the most conservative. Please circle the number that best describes your thinking. (Please circle only one number.)
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hata, M., Song, J., Shinada, Y. (2017). Has the 3.11 Disaster Brought About Conservatism in Japan?. In: Endo, K., Kurihara, S., Kamihigashi, T., Toriumi, F. (eds) Reconstruction of the Public Sphere in the Socially Mediated Age. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6138-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6138-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6137-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6138-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)