Abstract
Under the Kuznets Curve hypothesis, as an economy develops, income inequality increases initially during early development or industrialization phases and then tends to decline as the country attains a higher level of GDP per capita. Thus, inequality follows an inverted U-shape by first increasing and then declining as a function of GDP per capita. The environmental Kuznets Curve, on the other hand, shows the relationship between environmental quality and economic development. The hypothesis is that the environmental quality worsens up to some income levels as the country undergoes the industrialization process.
The aim of this chapter is to consider a cluster of countries in a comparable situation and to estimate the Kuznets curve and the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Our cluster consists of Turkey, Azerbaijan, Iran, Bulgaria, Romania, Mexico, and Gabon. The situation of the developing countries in the cluster is analyzed in terms of sustainability, as an economy facing increasing pollution or ever increasing inequality would not be sustainable. Our data do not generally support the idea of classical or environmental Kuznets curves that are inverse U. Rather, it emphasizes that there is a trade-off between the environment and equality. It appears that pollution and inequality are correlated features, with some countries under study heading toward more equality but also increasing emission and pollution, while other countries tidy up their environments but are becoming increasingly unequal. Therefore, it is suggested that current optimal policy would have to choose a compromise between the two conflicting targets.
References
Aiginger K (2014) Industrial policy for a sustainable growth path. Available via https://www.oecd.org/eco/Industrial-Policy-for-a-sustainable-growth-path.pdf
Andreoni J, Levinson A (2001) The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. J Public Econ 80:269–286
Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Perspect 16(1):147–168
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377
Kocak E (2014) Türkiye’de Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezinin Geçerliliği: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi 2(3):62–73
Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28
Liddle B, Messinis G (2014) Revisiting carbon Kuznets curves with endogenous breaks modeling: evidence of decoupling and saturation (but few inverted-us) for individual OECD countries. Available via https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59566/1/MPRA_paper_59566.pdf
Lucas REB, Wheeler D, Hettige H (1992) Economic development, environmental regulation and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution: 1960–1988. Available via http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/22/21773.pdf
Muller-Furstenberger G, Wagner M (2007) Exploring the environmental Kuznets hypothesis: theoretical and econometric problems. Ecol Econ 62:648–660
Panayotou T (1997) Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environ Dev Econ 2:465–484
Perman R, Stern DI (2003) Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. Aust J Agric Resour Econ:325–347
Selden DM, Song D (1994) Environ quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27(2):147–162
Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S (1992) Economic growth and environmental quality. Time-series and cross-country evidence. Available via http://125.235.8.196:8080/dspace/bitstream/CEID_123456789/4795/1/50_EconomicGrowthandEnvironmentalQuality(06_23-21)52tr.pdf
Song T, Zheng T, Tong L (2008) An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: a panel cointegration approach. China Econ Rev 19:381–392
Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32:1419–1439
Stokey NL (1998) Are there limits to growth? Int Econ Rev 39(1):1–31
Wagner M (2008) The carbon Kuznets curve: a cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics? Resour Energy Econ 30:388–408
World Bank (1992) World development report 1992: development and the environment. Oxford University Press, New York
World Bank (2016) World development indicators 2016. Highlights: featuring the sustainable development goals. World Bank Group, Washington, DC
Yulek MA (2017) Industrial policy and sustainable growth. In: Yulek MA (ed) Industrial policy and sustainable growth. Springer
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Nuroglu, E., Kunst, R.M. (2018). Kuznets and Environmental Kuznets Curves for Developing Countries. In: Yülek, M. (eds) Industrial Policy and Sustainable Growth. Sustainable Development . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5741-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5741-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5740-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5741-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences