Skip to main content

Kuznets and Environmental Kuznets Curves for Developing Countries

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Industrial Policy and Sustainable Growth

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development ((SD))

Abstract

Under the Kuznets Curve hypothesis, as an economy develops, income inequality increases initially during early development or industrialization phases and then tends to decline as the country attains a higher level of GDP per capita. Thus, inequality follows an inverted U-shape by first increasing and then declining as a function of GDP per capita. The environmental Kuznets Curve, on the other hand, shows the relationship between environmental quality and economic development. The hypothesis is that the environmental quality worsens up to some income levels as the country undergoes the industrialization process.

The aim of this chapter is to consider a cluster of countries in a comparable situation and to estimate the Kuznets curve and the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Our cluster consists of Turkey, Azerbaijan, Iran, Bulgaria, Romania, Mexico, and Gabon. The situation of the developing countries in the cluster is analyzed in terms of sustainability, as an economy facing increasing pollution or ever increasing inequality would not be sustainable. Our data do not generally support the idea of classical or environmental Kuznets curves that are inverse U. Rather, it emphasizes that there is a trade-off between the environment and equality. It appears that pollution and inequality are correlated features, with some countries under study heading toward more equality but also increasing emission and pollution, while other countries tidy up their environments but are becoming increasingly unequal. Therefore, it is suggested that current optimal policy would have to choose a compromise between the two conflicting targets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aiginger K (2014) Industrial policy for a sustainable growth path. Available via https://www.oecd.org/eco/Industrial-Policy-for-a-sustainable-growth-path.pdf

  • Andreoni J, Levinson A (2001) The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. J Public Econ 80:269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Perspect 16(1):147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocak E (2014) Türkiye’de Çevresel Kuznets EÄŸrisi Hipotezinin GeçerliliÄŸi: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı. Ä°ÅŸletme ve Ä°ktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi 2(3):62–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle B, Messinis G (2014) Revisiting carbon Kuznets curves with endogenous breaks modeling: evidence of decoupling and saturation (but few inverted-us) for individual OECD countries. Available via https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59566/1/MPRA_paper_59566.pdf

  • Lucas REB, Wheeler D, Hettige H (1992) Economic development, environmental regulation and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution: 1960–1988. Available via http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/22/21773.pdf

  • Muller-Furstenberger G, Wagner M (2007) Exploring the environmental Kuznets hypothesis: theoretical and econometric problems. Ecol Econ 62:648–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T (1997) Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environ Dev Econ 2:465–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perman R, Stern DI (2003) Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. Aust J Agric Resour Econ:325–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden DM, Song D (1994) Environ quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S (1992) Economic growth and environmental quality. Time-series and cross-country evidence. Available via http://125.235.8.196:8080/dspace/bitstream/CEID_123456789/4795/1/50_EconomicGrowthandEnvironmentalQuality(06_23-21)52tr.pdf

  • Song T, Zheng T, Tong L (2008) An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: a panel cointegration approach. China Econ Rev 19:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32:1419–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokey NL (1998) Are there limits to growth? Int Econ Rev 39(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M (2008) The carbon Kuznets curve: a cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics? Resour Energy Econ 30:388–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1992) World development report 1992: development and the environment. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2016) World development indicators 2016. Highlights: featuring the sustainable development goals. World Bank Group, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yulek MA (2017) Industrial policy and sustainable growth. In: Yulek MA (ed) Industrial policy and sustainable growth. Springer

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elif Nuroglu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Nuroglu, E., Kunst, R.M. (2018). Kuznets and Environmental Kuznets Curves for Developing Countries. In: Yülek, M. (eds) Industrial Policy and Sustainable Growth. Sustainable Development . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5741-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics