Skip to main content

Options of Monitoring the State of Protection Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mobile and Wireless Technologies 2017 (ICMWT 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 425))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This article describes the conceptual proposal of measuring erosion of rock formations using protection networks. It outlines the concept of two types of wireless sensors of a steel retaining network tension and a data concentrator unit, which cyclically reads the measured data from these wireless sensors. The measured data is then sent to the parental monitoring system, which is used for archiving, visualization and data processing. Communication between the wireless nodes and the data concentrator is based on the IQRF technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wendeler C, Bühler Y, Bartelt P, Glover J, Luis R (2016) Application of three-dimensional rockfall modeling to rock-face engineering. Rock Mech Rock Eng From Past Future 2:1303–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Prauzek M, Krömer P, Rodway J, Musilek P (2016) Differential evolution of fuzzy controller for environmentally-powered wireless sensors. Appl Soft Comput J 48:193–206. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.06.040 Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pies M, Hajovsky R, Latocha M, Ozana S (2014) Radio telemetry unit for online monitoring system at mining dumps. Appl Mech Mater 548-549:736–743. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.548-549.736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pies M, Hajovsky R, Ozana S, Haska J (2014) Wireless sensory network based on IQRF technology. In: 4th international workshop on computer science and engineering-winter

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lin H, Ling HI, Li L, Collin JG, Leshchinsky D, Rimoldi P (2013) Centrifuge modeling of gabion walls reinforced with geosynthetics. Design Practice of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Structures, pp 93–102

    Google Scholar 

  6. Talend D (2013) Going to extremes: Expertise and slope stabilization systems handle some of the toughest sites imaginable. Erosion Control 20(4):28–35

    Google Scholar 

  7. Simonetti A (2012) A measurement technique for the vibrating wire sensors. NORCHIP 2012, art. no. 6403147. doi:10.1109/NORCHP.2012.6403147

  8. Mandavkar S, Stralla A, Kanati NV (2012) Construction of MSE walls at St. Anthony Falls (I-35 W) bridge. Geotechnical Special Publication (225 GSP), pp 3634–3643. doi:10.1061/9780784412121.372

  9. Jayakrishnan PV., Suntharathevan, Vicari M, Uguccioni G, Budhbhatti R (2012) Composite soil reinforcement system in construction of high retaining walls for Albania Highway Project. In: GA 2012 - 5th Asian regional conference on geosynthetics: geosynthetics for sustainable adaptation to climate change, pp 939–944

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mandavkar S, Stralla A (2011) Maccaferri terramesh system, gabion face MSE walls at ST. Anthony Falls (I-35 W) bridge. Geotechnical Special Publication (211 GSP), pp 3449–3458. doi:10.1061/41165(397)353

  11. Benessiuti MF, Bernardes GP, Ananias EJ (2010) Segmental retaining wall: Comparison between predicted and observed slip surface. In: 9th international conference on geosynthetics - geosynthetics: advanced solutions for a challenging world, pp 1773–1776

    Google Scholar 

  12. Castro-Fresno D, López Q. L, Bianco-Fernandez E, Zamora-Barraza D (2009) Design and evaluation of two laboratory tests for the nets of a flexible anchored slope stabilization system. Geotech Test J 32(4):315–324

    Google Scholar 

  13. Züger M, Haller B (2005) High-energy rockfall barriers for 3,000 KJ impact energies to protect B4 highway at Ilfeld, Germany. Pol Geol Inst Spec Pap 20:125–130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the project of the Ministry of Industry and Trade - MPO FV10706 “Research and development of intelligent sensor network to monitor safety barriers for geotechnical use” and by project SP2017/158, “Development of algorithms and systems for control, measurement and safety applications III” of Student Grant System, VSB-TU Ostrava.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radovan Hajovsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hajovsky, R., Pies, M., Stankus, M. (2018). Options of Monitoring the State of Protection Networks. In: Kim, K., Joukov, N. (eds) Mobile and Wireless Technologies 2017. ICMWT 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 425. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5281-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5281-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5280-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5281-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics