Skip to main content

Sensitive Research Methodology and Approach: An Introduction

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

Abstract

The goal of research is “that of discerning and uncovering the actual facts of [people]’ lives and experience, facts that have been hidden, inaccessible, suppressed, distorted, misunderstood, ignored” (Bergen 1993; Bergen 1996, p. 200).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbink J, Salverda T. The anthropology of elites: power, culture, and the complexities of distinction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar LLM, Schneider CJ. Researching amongst elites: challenges and opportunities in studying up. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge J. Working with vulnerable groups in social research: dilemmas by default and design. Qual Res. 2012;14(1):112–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge J. Participatory research: working with vulnerable groups in research and practice. Bristol: Policy Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard M. Discomforting research: colliding moralities and looking for ‘truth’ in a study of parental drug problems. Sociol Health Illn. 2005;27(1):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen RK. Interviewing survivors of marital rape: Doing feminist research on sensi- tive topics. In C. M. Renzetti & R. M. Lee (Eds.), Researching sensitive topics (pp. 197–211). Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen RK. Wife rape: understanding the responses of survivors and service provides. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birman D. Ethical issues in research with immigrants and refugees. In: Trimble JE, Fisher CB, editors. Handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. p. 155–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken-Roche D, Bell E, Racine E. The “vulnerability” of psychiatric research participants: why this research ethics concept needs to be revisited. Can J Psychiatr. 2016;61:335–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken-Roche D, Bell E, McDonald ME, Racine E. The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;5:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R. Emotionally involved: the impact of researching rape. New York: Routledge; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch J, Durant B, Hill J. Uncovering marginalised knowledges: undertaking research with hard-to-reach young people. Int J Mult Res Approaches. 2014;8(1):15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift V. Undertaking sensitive health research: The experiences of researchers. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Public Health, School of Health and Environment, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift V, James E, Liamputtong P. Undertaking sensitive research in the health and social sciences: managing boundaries, emotions and risks. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey WS. Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qual Res. 2011;11(4):431–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B, Clarke JM. Collecting sensitive data: the impact on researchers. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(3):421–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee RM. Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee R, Lee Y. Methodological research on “sensitive” topics: a decade review. Bull Sociol Methodol. 2012;114(1):35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley K. Vulnerable populations in research. In: Cautin RL, Lilienfeld SO, editors. The encyclopedia of clinical psychology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2015. p. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp214.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCosker H, Barnard A, Gerber R. Undertaking sensitive research: issues and strategies for meeting the safety needs of all participants. Qual Soc Res. 2001;2(1):327–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros P. A guide for graduate students: barriers to conducting qualitative research among vulnerable groups. Conting Horiz: York Univ Stud J Anthropol. 2017; Retrieved on 4 July 2017 from https://contingenthorizons.com/2017/02/25/a-guide-for-graduate-students-barriers-to-conducting-qualitative-research-among-vulnerable-groups/.

  • Melrose M. Labour pains: some considerations on the difficulties of researching juvenile prostitution. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2002;5(4):333–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menih H. Applying ethical principles in researching a vulnerable population: homeless women in Brisbane. Current issues in. Crim Justice. 2013;25(1):527–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikecz R. Interviewing elites: addressing methodological issues. Qual Inq. 2012;18(6):482–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell P, Tierney E, O’Carroll A, Nurse D, MacFarlane A. Exploring levers and barriers to accessing primary care for marginalised groups and identifying their priorities for primary care provision: a participatory learning and action research study. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0487-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odendahl T, Shaw AM. Interviewing elites. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, editors. Handbook of interview research: context & method. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002. p. 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne G, Payne J. Key concepts in social research. Sage key concepts. London: Sage; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts MK, Smith AMA, editors. Researching the margins: strategies for ethical and rigorous research with marginalised communities. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch S. Research with children: the same or different from research with adults. Childhood. 2002;9(3):321–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quest T, Marco CA. Ethics seminars: vulnerable populations in emergency medicine research. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;10(11):1294–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn CR. General considerations for research with vulnerable populations: ten lessons for success. Health Justice. 2015;3:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-014-0013-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti CM, Lee RM, editors. Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrems BM. Informed consent, vulnerability and the risks of group-specific attribution. Nurs Ethics. 2014;21:829–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivayogi P. Vulnerable population and methods for their safeguard. Perspect Clin Res. 2013;4(1):53–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.106389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon SR. Protecting and respecting the vulnerable: existing regulations or further protections? Theor Med Bioeth. 2013;34:17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens N. Collecting data from elites and ultra elites: telephone and face-to-face interviews with macroeconomists. Qual Res. 2007;7(2):203–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone TH. The invisible vulnerable: the economically and educationally disadvantaged subjects of clinical research. J Law Med Ethics. 2003;31(1):149–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straubhaar R. The methodological benefits of social media: “studying up” in Brazil in the Facebook age. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2015;28(9):1081–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P. Talking to terrorists: a personal journey from the IRA to Al Qaeda. London: Harper Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Have H. Respect for human vulnerability: the emergence of a new principle in bioethics. J Bioeth Inq. 2015;12:395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Have H. Vulnerability: challenging bioethics. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Liempt I, Bilger V. The ethics of migration research methodology: dealing with vulnerable migrants. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams C. Researching power, elites and leadership. London: Sage; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley A, Dawson A. Vulnerability and marginalized populations. In: Barrett DH, Ortmann LW, Dawson A, Saenz C, Reis A, Bolan G, editors. Public health ethics: cases spanning the globe. Dordrecht: Springer Open; 2016. p. 203–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23847-0_7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman H. Scientific elite. Transaction: New Brunswick; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pranee Liamputtong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Liamputtong, P. (2019). Sensitive Research Methodology and Approach: An Introduction. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_122

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics