Abstract
In combination with the advancements of three-dimensional printing, a patient-specific surgical guide (PSG) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a convenient surgical instrument and has been implicated in the ideal positioning of the components, including acetabular and femoral components. PSG is designed and manufactured based on either preoperative computed tomography (CT) data or magnetic resonance imaging data. PSGs for THA are mainly classified into three types: PSG for guidewire insertion, PSG for bone cutting, and PSG for bone reaming and implant fixation. PSG positioning accuracy depends on the PSG design and contact area on the bone surface. PSGs for the acetabular component, for the conventional femoral component, and for the resurfacing femoral component have been clinically used. Based on the removal of soft tissues and preparation needed to confirm PSG setting, PSGs for THA do not always mean minimal invasive surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M, Zimolong A, Kaspers G, Rau G, Staudte HW. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:28–38.
Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:815–21.
Miki H, Yamanashi W, Nishii T, Sato Y, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:946–52.
Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:282–8.
Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:530–4.
Hananouchi T, Saito M, Koyama T, Hagio K, Murase T, Sugano N, Yoshikawa H. Tailor-made surgical guide based on rapid prototyping technique for cup insertion in total hip Arthroplasty. Int J Med Robot. 2009;5:164–9.
Hananouchi T, Saito M, Koyama T, Sugano N, Yoshikawa H. Tailor-made surgical guide reduces incidence of outliers of cup placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1088–95.
Kunz M, Rudan JF, Xenoyannis GL, Ellis RE. Computer-assisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:600–6.
Raaijmaakers M, Gelaude F, De Smedt K, Clijmans T, Dille J, Mulier M. A custom-made guide-wire positioning device for hip surface replacement Arthroplasty: description and first results. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:161–7.
Zhang YZ, Chen B, Lu S, Yang Y, Zhao JM, Liu R, Li YB, Pei GX. Preliminary application of computer-assissted patient-specific acetabular navigational template for total hip arthroplasty in adult single development dysplasia of the hip. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2011;7:469–74.
Andenaert E, De Smedt K, Gelaude F, Clijmans T, Pattyn C, Geebelen B. A custom-made guide for femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development and validation study. Comput Aided Surg. 2011;16:304–9.
Buller L, Smith T, Bryan J, Klika A, Barsoum W, Ianntti JP. The use of patient-specific instrumentation improves the accuracy of acetabular component placement. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:631–6.
Kitada M, Sakai T, Murase T, Hanada T, Nakamura N, Sugano N. Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9:223–9.
Sakai T, Hanada T, Murase T, Kitada M, Hamada H, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Validation of patient specific surgical guides in total hip arthroplasty. Int J Med Robot. 2014;10:113–20.
Small T, Krebs V, Molloy R, Bryan J, Klika AK, Barsoum WK. Comparison of acetabular shell position using patient specific instruments vs. standard surgical instruments: a randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1030–7.
Sakai T, Hamada H, Takao M, Murase T, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Validation of patient-specific surgical guides for femoral neck cutting in total hip arthroplasty through the anterolateral approach. Int J Med Robot. 2017;13(3)
Steppacher SD, Kowal JH, Murphy SB. Improving cup positioning using a mechanical navigation instrument. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:423–8.
Kitada M, Nakamura N, Iwana D, Kakimoto A, Nishii T, Sugano N. Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:674–9.
Murase T, Oka K, Moritomo H, Goto A, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. Three-dimensional corrective osteotomy of malunited fractures of the upper extremity with use of a computer simulation system. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2375–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sakai, T. (2018). Patient-Specific Surgical Guide for Total Hip Arthroplasty. In: Sugano, N. (eds) Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery for Hip and Knee. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5245-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5245-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5244-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5245-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)