Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tobacco CSR and the Ethics Game Paradox: A Qualitative Approach for Evaluating Tobacco Brand Name Strategy Following Plain Packaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Goals of Sustainable Development

Abstract

Smoking is a key driver of the non-communicable disease epidemic and the leading cause of avoidable premature death. Accordingly, governments around the globe have imposed tough regulations on manufacturers’ marketing activities in order to reduce tobacco sales and the harmful effects of smoking. Despite these constraints tobacco companies continue to use the available elements of the marketing mix to promote their products, while also engaging in corporate social responsibility activities that seek to offset negative public perceptions of their products. The Australian tobacco market changed in December 2012 when plain packaging of cigarettes became law and this key avenue for branding cigarettes was closed. However, tobacco manufacturers continued to introduce new brand variants and segment the market with highly differentiated offerings. A key dimension of the manufacturer response to plain packaging involved a new brand name strategy. After plain packaging the brand name presented the only means of differentiating tobacco offerings and the structure of these evolved to include an existing brand name and two or more descriptive words. Words used as descriptors are often colour words although more abstract words are also employed, for example Dunhill Infinite White or Winfield Optimum Crush Blue. Preliminary research suggests that these modified tri-component brand names evoke positive connotations in consumers and reduce their negative perceptions regarding the harmful effects of smoking. By understanding the tobacco company’s current brand naming strategy recommendations for further effective tobacco controls can be developed. This paper presents a methodology that can be employed to explore the new complex tobacco brand names. Specific projective and in-depth elicitation techniques are outlined that should facilitate understanding of the connotations that consumers attach to these new brand names. This research contributes to the CSR literature by examining the strategy of an industry that claims to be socially responsible, yet markets products that kill its customers—such paradox has been noted previously in relation to tobacco and manufacturers of other harmful products. The paper also contributes to the Marketing literature on evaluating brand names, specifically in the area of brand name structure and interpretation of word combinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, D. A. (2006). Building strong brands. NY, USA: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal-Travers, M., O’Connor, R., Fix, B. V., & Cummings, K. M. (2011). What do cigarette pack colors communicate to smokers in the U.S.? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(6), 683–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, S., & Ilicic, J. (2015). Priming referential meaning through an Iconic Brand Colour. Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC) Conference Proceedings, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, A., & Ostberg, J. (2006). Researching the culture of brands. In R. W. Belk (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binesh, F. (2011). The importance of cigarette pack as brand image. International Business Management, 5(2), 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, C. (2005). A look at the evidence for the usefulness, reliability and validity of projective techniques in market research. International Journal of Market Research, 47(3), 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bristol, T., & Fern, E. F. (1996). Exploring the atmosphere created by focus group interviews: comparing consumers’ feelings across qualitative techniques. Journal of the Market Research Society, 38(2), 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • British American Tobacco Australia Limited. (2011). Submission in response to the consultation paper. Retrieved August 6, 2014, from www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/bataresponse-tpp-oct2011.

  • Combe, I. A., Crowther, D. E., & Greenland, S. (2003). The semiology of changing brand image. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D., & Seifi, S. (2012). The ethics game paradox. Multidisciplinary Journal for Applied Ethics, 1(1), 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, R. (1996). Smoke and mirrors: The Canadian tobacco war. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. (2010). Big Tobacco hired public relations firm to lobby government. The Sydney Morning Herald (September 11). Retrieved January 2011, from http://www.smh.com.au/national/big-tobacco-hired-public-relations-firm-to-lobby-government-20100910-154yg.html.

  • De Chernatony, L., & Riley, F. (1998). Defining a ‘brand’: Beyond the literature with experts’ interpretations. Journal of Marketing Management, 14, 417–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, A., Moodie, C., & Hastings, G. (2012). The role of packaging for consumer products: Understanding the move towards plain tobacco packaging. Addiction Research & Theory, 20(4), 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S. J. (1994). The branch environment. In P. J. McGoldrick & S. J. Greenland (Eds.), Retailing of financial services (pp. 163–196). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S. J. (2011). Plainly powerful packaging—marketing objectives of cigarette pack design. ANZMAC Conference Proceedings, Perth, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S. (2012). Does plain packaging spell death for cigarette brands in Australia and beyond? In S. Greenland, J. Bainbridge, C. Galloway, & R. Gill (Eds.), Strategic communication: Cases in marketing, public relations, advertising and media (pp. 2–13). Australia: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S. J. (2015). Cigarette brand variant portfolio strategy and the use of colour in a darkening market. Tobacco Control, 24, e65–e71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S. J. (2016). The Australian experience following plain packaging: The impact on tobacco branding. Addiction, 111(12), 2248–2258.  

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S. J., Johnson, L. W., & Seifi, S. (2016). Tobacco manufacturer brand strategy following plain packaging in Australia: Implications for social responsibility and policy. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(2), 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, D., Arnott, D., Dockrell, M., Lee, A., & McNeill, A. (2009). Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adult and youth. European Journal of Public Health, 19(6), 631–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, L. (2012). Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: Promotion, packaging, price and place. Tobacco Control, 21(2), 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, P., & Lewis, K. M. (2008). What’s in a name? Using card sorting to evaluate branding in an academic library’s web site. College and Research Libraries, 69(3), 242–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschhorn, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: Hope or hype? Tobacco Control, 13(4), 447–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, J., Wong, C., Gendall, P, Louviere, J., & Cong, K. (2010). When less is more: Branding, plain packaging and young adult smokers. Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference Proceedings, Christchurch, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, J., Wong, C., Glendall, P., Louviere, J., & Cong, K. (2011). Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers. Tobacco Control, 20(3), 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, J., Gendall, P., Eckert, C., Kemper, J., & Louviere, J. (2016). Effects of brand variants on smokers’ choice behaviours and risk perceptions. Tobacco Control, 25(2), 160–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, A., van Hoof, J., Walenberg, N., & de Jong, M. (2007). Projective techniques for brand image research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 10(3), 300–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S., & Ku, H. (2016). Brand image management for nonprofit organizations: Exploring the relationships between websites, brand images and donations. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 80–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, C., & LaBahn, D. W. (1997). Observations: Creating effective brand names: A study of the naming process. Journal of Advertising Research, 37(1), 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., & Burton, S. (2009). Marketing Management. French’s Forest, Australia: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrecque, L., & Milne, G. (2012). Exciting red and competent blue: The importance of color in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(5), 711–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, T. J., Hewett, K., & Roth, M. S. (2000). Managing images in different cultures: A cross-national study of color meanings and preferences. Journal of International Marketing, 8(4), 90–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, C., & Ford, A. (2011). Young adult smokers’ perceptions of cigarette pack innovation, pack colour and plain packaging. Australasian Marketing Journal, 19(3), 174–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, C., Stead, M., Bauld, L., McNeill, A., Angus, K., Hinds, K., et al. (2012). Plain tobacco packaging: A systematic review. Retrieved January 14, 2017, from http://phrc.lshtm.ac.uk/papers/PHRC_006_Final_Report.pdf.

  • Padilla, J. (2010). The impact of plain packaging of cigarettes in Australia: A simulation exercise. Belgium: Report for Philip Morris International, LEGC Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, S. (1999). Tobacco masters settlement agreement 1998: Overview, implementation by states, and congressional issues. Library of Congress: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Righi, C., James, J., Beasley, M., Day, D. L., Fox, J. E., Gieber, J., et al. (2013). Card sort analysis best practices. Journal of Usability Studies, 8(3), 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimmer, M. (2012). Big Tobacco’s box fetish: Plain packaging at the high court, The Conversation, 20 April. Retrieved January 2017, from https://theconversation.com/big-tobaccos-box-fetish-plain-packaging-at-the-high-court-6518.

  • Romaniuk, J., & Nenycz-Thiel, M. (2014). Measuring the strength of color brand-name links. Journal of Advertising Research, 54(3), 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollo, M., Bayly, M., & Wakefield, M. (2015). Plain packaging: A logical progression for tobacco control in one of the world’s ‘darkest markets’. Tobacco Control, 24(2), 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifi, S., & Crowther, D. (2016). Sustainability and resource depletion. In D. Crowther & S. Seifi (Eds.), Modern Organizational Governance. Emerald: Bingley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, D., Hooley, G. J., & Wallace, S. (1988). The brand name development process. International Journal of Advertising, 7(3), 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supphellen, M. (2000). Understanding core brand equity: Guidelines for in-depth elicitation of brand associations. International Journal of Market Research, 42(3), 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobacco Station Group. (2011). Submission to tobacco control. Retrieved August, 6, 2014, from www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/Kerry-Browne.

  • Underwood, R. L. (2003). The communicative power of product packaging: Creating brand identity via lived and mediated experience. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11(1), 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, M., Germain, D., & Durkin, S. J. (2008). How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers’ perceptions about brand image? An experimental study Tobacco Control, 17(6), 416–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, M., Germain, D., Durkin, S., Hammond, D., Goldberg, M., & Borland, R. (2012). Do larger pictorial health warnings diminish the need for plain packaging of cigarettes? Addiction, 107, 1159–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, M., Morley, C., Horan, J. K., & Cummings, K. M. (2002). The cigarette pack as image: New evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control, 11(1), 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, P. (2016). An unholy alliance: Astroturfing in a post-democratic world and its implications for organisational governance. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Corporate Social Responsibility and 6th Organisational Governance Conference, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 246–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2004). Tobacco industry and corporate responsibility: An inherent contradiction. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2014). Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, M., Bayly, M., Brennan, E., Dono, J., Miller, C., Durkin, S., et al. (2014). Personal tobacco pack display before and after the introduction of plain packaging with larger pictorial health warnings in Australia: An observational study of outdoor café strips. Addiction, 109(4), 653–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia

    Anne Morton

  2. Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia

    Steven J. Greenland

Authors
  1. Anne Morton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven J. Greenland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Morton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Leicester Business School , De Montford University Faculty of Business & Law, Leicester, United Kingdom

    David Crowther

  2. University of Derby , Derby, United Kingdom

    Shahla Seifi

  3. Federation University , Ballarat, Victoria, Australia

    Abdul Moyeen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morton, A., Greenland, S.J. (2018). Tobacco CSR and the Ethics Game Paradox: A Qualitative Approach for Evaluating Tobacco Brand Name Strategy Following Plain Packaging. In: Crowther, D., Seifi, S., Moyeen, A. (eds) The Goals of Sustainable Development . Approaches to Global Sustainability, Markets, and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5047-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation