Skip to main content

Changing Geopolitics of Energy Security and the Nuclear Power

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resurgence of Nuclear Power

Abstract

The changing terms and reference of energy security is redefining its geopolitics. It is no more a geographical construct of buyers and sellers of hydrocarbons. With the signing of the Paris Agreement, the global community has endorsed an energy pathway that points towards the beginning of the end of oil era despite the huge reserves of oil much widely spread than hitherto. The arrival of sources of clean energy in market, reflects a new power dynamics. The ongoing technological innovation with growing digitalization has given the clean energy a leverage moving beyond the desirability to inevitability. That precisely explains the new acknowledgement for the nuclear energy across the globe with a few exceptions. The chapter aims at to capture the essence of the new narrative on nuclear energy by drawing heavily from the literature from diverse vantage points. The message is that nuclear power in contemporary sustainable energy security discourse has acquired its strategic salience beyond weaponisation. Security from nuclear power, today, is seen more as a source of energy and associated use than the weapon of balancing the power. This is evident in the growing size of its market, especially in Asia, where the energy consumption is expected to grow both to meet the needs of emerging Asia and to address the energy poverty. However, without romanticising its profile, this chapter underlines the needs of locating it, in an energy regime which draws its rationale from looking at energy as part of global common.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nuclear for climate (N4C) is a grassroots initiative, which brings together scientists and professionals of the global nuclear community, and also citizens who believe that in order to fight climate change we have to act now. They believe that nuclear is part of the solution.

  2. 2.

    Expresses concern about subsidies to fossil fuels, “which encourage wasteful consumption” and totalled $548 billion in 2013, over half of this for oil. Ten countries account for almost three-quarters of the world total for fossil fuel subsidies, five of them in Middle East (notably Iran and Saudi Arabia ) or North Africa where much electricity is generated from oil and where nuclear power plants and even renewables would be competitive, but for those subsidies. The report advocates ensuring “that energy prices reflect their full economic value by introducing market pricing and removing price controls”. Renewables subsides in 2013 are put at $121 billion and rising $45 billion of this being solar PV . Geographically, this is $69 billion for EU and $27 billion in USA . The report was unable to assign a figure for nuclear subsidies, which at present do not exist. The difficulty in reducing subsidies is discussed.

  3. 3.

    The EPR is a third-generation pressurised water reactor (PWR ) design. It has been designed and developed mainly by Framatome (nowAreva ) and Électricité de France (EDF) in France, and Siemens in Germany . In Europe , this reactor design was called European Pressurized Reactor, and the internationalised name was Evolutionary Power Reactor, but it is now simply named EPR (technical details: https://en.wikipedia.org).

  4. 4.

    Exelon, based in Chicago and the largest operator of nuclear plants in America , says that five of its 14 plants are vulnerable because of economic factors, including Three Mile Island ’s Unit One, which it owns. “It’s ironic. People ask why we still operate a reactor there. But if gas prices were not [so low], it would be making money”, says David Brown of Exelon.

    On October 13th Entergy, Exelon’s rival, which is based in New Orleans, said it would close its Pilgrim nuclear plant in Massachusetts, partly because its costs, at about $50 a megawatt-hour (MWh), are higher than electricity prices in the state, which have fallen to about $45/MWh. As The Economist went to press, it was due to decide whether to close a third, Fitzpatrick, in New York State. In December, it closed one in Vermont, the fourth American nuclear plant to shut in the past two years.

  5. 5.

    There is little or no likelihood of any uranium-producing country or region gaining a monopoly. Uranium resources are distributed evenly, and 35% of global uranium resources are located in OECD countries. Australia alone holds 23% of global resources, and around one-quarter of global resources are located in Eurasia, alongside significant resources in Africa and Latin America.

  6. 6.

    Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are nuclear power plants that are smaller in size (300 MWe or less) than current generation base load plants (1000 MWe or higher). These smaller, compact designs are factory-fabricated reactors that can be transported by truck or rail to a nuclear power site. SMRs will play an important role in addressing the energy security, economic and climate goals of the USA if they can be commercially deployed within the next decade” (Refer: https://www.energy.gov).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Girijesh Pant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pant, G. (2017). Changing Geopolitics of Energy Security and the Nuclear Power. In: Janardhanan, N., Pant, G., Grover, R. (eds) Resurgence of Nuclear Power. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5029-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5029-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5028-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5029-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics