Skip to main content

A Comparative Analysis of Relative Positioning Methods for BDS/GPS in Three Different Fields of Combination

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2017 Proceedings: Volume I (CSNC 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 437))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1896 Accesses

Abstract

In this contribution, we study the models of BDS/GPS combined in three different fields relative positioning, which contain field of coordinate estimates, field of normal equations and that of observation equations. The precision of coordinate solution, differences and similarities in different fields are discussed. On the condition of single epoch and static sequential Least-squares calculation, combination of normal equation field and that of observation equation field are with equivalence, while on the condition of dynamic calculation, the combination of observations equation field is more rigorous than that of normal equation field, and the Ratio rate of the integer ambiguity estimates is higher. Based on the data from measured short-baseline, we verify inference given in the contribution by experiment and analyze through calculation on single epoch, sequential Least-squares and dynamic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yuanxi Y (2010) Progress, contribution and challenges of compass/Beidou satellite navigation system. Acts Geodaetlca et Canographica Sinico. 39(1):P1–P6

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wei Z (2008) China geodetic coordinate system 2000 and its comparison with WGS84. J Geodesy Geodynmics 28(5):P1–P5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gao X, Guo J, Cheng P et al (2012) Fusion positioning of BeiDou/GPS based on spatio temporal system unification. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 41(5):P743–748

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zang N (2015), A study on the algorithms of BDS and GNSS precise point positioning. Chang’an University, China

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang G, Yang Y, Zhang Q et al (2013) GNSS precise point positioning algorithm based on parameter equivalent reduction principle. The 4th China satellite navigation conference (CSNC), pp 449–469

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li X (2014), Research on the algorithm of integrated positioning and the preliminary results based on BeiDou/GPS. The 5th China satellite navigation conference (CSNC)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Q, Li G (2005) GPS measuring principle and application. Science Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimates. J Geodesy 70(1):P65–P82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. (2009) Wuhan university adjustment error theory and measurement of foundation. Wuhan University Press

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang GW (2008) GPS precise point positioning and high precision GPS baseline net adjustment research and its software implementation. Chang ‘an University

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yang Y, He H (2005) Sequential least squares estimator for solving ambiguity of kinematic GPS phase measurement. Geomatic Sci Eng 2005(1):P1–4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the state key development program “collaborative precision positioning technology” (Project No. 2016YFB0501804), funded and supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (Project No.: 4150400641674034), Chinese Academy of Sciences 100 and cutting-edge technology research plan (project number: QYZDB-SSW-DQC028) funding. At the same time, this paper also obtained the National Natural Science Fund Project (41304033); the two generation of navigation major project of construction and operation maintenance center (GFZX0301040308); the natural science foundation of Shaanxi province (2016JQ4011) funded project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lingchuan Wan or Guanwen Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wan, L., Huang, G., Tu, R., Zhang, J., Han, J. (2017). A Comparative Analysis of Relative Positioning Methods for BDS/GPS in Three Different Fields of Combination. In: Sun, J., Liu, J., Yang, Y., Fan, S., Yu, W. (eds) China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2017 Proceedings: Volume I. CSNC 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 437. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4588-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4588-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4587-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4588-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics