Abstract
Automatic exposure control (AEC) techniques in computed tomography (CT) have been defined as automatic modulation of tube current in the x–y plane (angular AEC), along the z-axis (z-axis AEC) or both (combined AEC), according to the size and attenuation characteristics of the body region being scanned. These techniques should provide constant image quality while lowering the radiation dose to patients. Although AEC is an important feature of all modern CT units, standard methodology for quality control of AEC does not exist. Aim of the paper was to provide reliable quality control (QC) method for AEC techniques used in CT. Change of tube current during the CT examination happens only if the scan projection radiogram (SPR) shows different size and attenuation characteristics of the object being scanned. In order to maintain repeatability of the modulation we used standard polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) dosimetry phantom, placed with flat side along the z-axis. After SPR was taken, phantom was removed, and CT solid-state detector was placed in the isocenter. Measurements were performed in axial mode, one slice only, for different positions along the z-axis. Dose rates measured in the isocenter, that are proportional to tube current, were found depending on the phantom geometry. In the phantom center the width of rectangle is the same as the diameter of the cylindrical phantom (32 cm), while height corresponds to the cylinder thickness (15 cm). Results show that during the rotation the current is highest when the tube is positioned at the x-axis, and lowest when tube is crossing the y-axis. However, when the detector is moved to position \(z = 14.1\,\mathrm{cm}\), tube current (air kerma rate) does not change during the rotation. The methodology presented in this study could be used as a basis for defining the QC procedure for TCM. The results are consistent with the expected outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of AtomicRadiation . Sources and effects of ionizing radiation.New York: United Nations 2010.
Huda Walter, Slone Richard M. Review of radiologic physics.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2003.
Molen A. J., Schilham A., Stoop P., Prokop M., Geleijns J.. Anational survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands Insights into Imaging. 2013;4:383–390.
Hart D, Wall BF, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC. Frequency and collectivedose for medical and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, 2008 Health Protection Agency. 2010.
Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, et al. Radiation exposure in multi-sliceversus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey European radiology. 2003;13:1979–1991.
Reiser MF, Hricak H, Knauth M. Radiation Dose fromMultidetector CT.Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag 2012.
Martin CJ, Sookpeng S. Setting up computed tomography automatic tubecurrent modulation systems Journal of RadiologicalProtection. 2016;36:R74.
Rampado O, Marchisio F, Izzo A, et al. Effective dose and imagequality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulationsystem with an anthropomorphic phantom European journal ofradiology. 2009;72:181–187.
Söderberg Marcus, Gunnarsson Mikael. Automatic exposure controlin computed tomography–an evaluation of systems from differentmanufacturers Acta Radiologica. 2010;51:625–634.
Sookpeng S, Martin CJ, Gentle DJ. Comparison of different phantomdesigns for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation systemtests Journal of Radiological Protection. 2013;33:735.
Sookpeng Supawitoo, Martin Colin J, Gentle David J. Investigation ofthe influence of image reconstruction filter and scan parameters onoperation of automatic tube current modulation systems fordifferent CT scanners Radiation protection dosimetry. 2014:ncu236.
Saltybaeva Natalia, Krauss Andreas, Alkadhi Hatem. Effect ofLocalizer Radiography Projection on Organ Dose at Chest CT withAutomatic Tube Current Modulation Radiology. 2016:160384.
Keat Nicholas. CT scanner automatic exposure control systems.MHRA 2005.
McCollough Cynthia H, Bruesewitz Michael R, Kofler Jr James M. CTdose reduction and dose management tools: overview of availableoptions 1 Radiographics. 2006;26:503–512.
Sookpeng S, Martin CJ, Gentle DJ, Lopez-Gonzalez MR. Relationshipsbetween patient size, dose and image noise under automatic tubecurrent modulation systems Journal of RadiologicalProtection. 2013;34:103.
PTW . Solutions. Freiburg, Germany 2016.
RTI . CT Dose Profiler: Probe for evaluation of CT systems.Mölndal, Sweden 2015.
Althén Jonas Nilsson. Automatic tube-current modulation in CT–acomparison between different solutions Radiation protectiondosimetry. 2005.
Rego Shawna L, Yu Lifeng, Bruesewitz Michael R, Vrieze Thomas J,Kofler James M, McCollough Cynthia H. CARE Dose4D CT automaticexposure control system: physics principles and practical hintsMayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. 2008.
Lee Chang Hyun, Goo Jin Mo, Ye Hyun Ju, et al. Radiation DoseModulation Techniques in the Multidetector CT Era: From Basics toPractice 1 Radiographics. 2008;28:1451–1459.
Schindera Sebastian T, Nelson Rendon C, Toth Thomas L, et al. Effectof patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatictube current modulation: phantom study American Journal ofRoentgenology. 2008;190:W100–W105.
Keat Nicholas. Report 05016: CT scanner automatic exposurecontrol systems. London: Department of Health 2005.
Iball Gareth R, Moore Alexis C, Crawford Elizabeth J. A routinequality assurance test for CT automatic exposure control systemsJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2016;17.
Molen Aart J, Joemai Raoul MS, Geleijns Jacob. Performance oflongitudinal andvolumetric tube current modulation in a 64-slice CT with different choices ofacquisition and reconstruction parameters Physica Medica. 2012;28:319–326.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Redžić, M., Beganović, A., Čiva, L., Jašić, R., Skopljak-Beganović, A., Vegar-Zubović, S. (2017). Quality control of angular tube current modulation. In: Badnjevic, A. (eds) CMBEBIH 2017. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 62. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_85
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_85
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4165-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4166-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)