Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supply Chain Risk Management: A Comprehensive Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supply Chain Risk Management

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to investigate recent research developments in supply chain risk management (SCRM) and to provide a comprehensive outline for researchers and practitioners who are trying to identify the existing state of research in the SCRM area. The importance of a literature review is to enhance the understanding of researchers by cataloging previous research in an area and clarifying the strengths and weaknesses of existing studies and what they might mean. Since the number of studies on SCRM has increased dramatically, several review papers of existing papers have been published. By finding significant number of review papers in the area, we convinced about the necessity of including summary of review papers. Therefore, we first summarize previous SCRM review papers. Second, we review recent papers that have not been mentioned in these review papers. Third, we develop a framework by which to categorize these papers. We conclude by presenting the observed pattern of SCRM research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam, A. (2008). Handbook of asset and liability management: From models to optimal return strategies (p. 10). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aloini, D., Dulmin, R., Mininno, V., & Ponticelli, S. (2012). Supply chain management: A review of implementation risks in the construction industry. Business Process Management Journal, 18(5), 735–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aqlan, F., & Lam, S. S. (2015). Supply chain risk modelling and mitigation. International Journal of Production Research, 53(18), 5640–5656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aqlan, F., & Lam, S. S. (2016). Supply chain optimization under risk and uncertainty: A case study for high-end server manufacturing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 93, 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnezhad, A., Connett, B. I., & Nair, M. (2013). The evolution of supply chain risk management. Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Management, 11(1), 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benders, J. F. (1962). Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik, 4(1), 238–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bot, P., van Donk, D. P., Pennink, B., & Simatupang, T. M. (2015). Uncertainties in the bidirectional biodiesel supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, D. E., Blackhurst, J. V., & Cortes, J. D. (2014). The clock is ticking: The role of uncertainty, regulatory focus, and level of risk on supply chain disruption decision making behavior. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 72, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan management review, 46(1), 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colicchia, C., & Strozzi, F. (2012). Supply chain risk management: A new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daultani, Y., Kumar, S., Vaidya, O. S., & Tiwari, M. K. (2015). A supply chain network equilibrium model for operational and opportunism risk mitigation. International Journal of Production Research, 53(18), 5685–5715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, D., & Spinler, S. (2013). Defining a common ground for supply chain risk management—A case study in the fast-moving consumer goods industry. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 16(4), 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2014). Supply chain management: It’s all about the journey, not the destination. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahimnia, B., Tang, C. S., Davarzani, H., & Sarkis, J. (2015). Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallah, H., Eskandari, H., & Pishvaee, M. S. (2015). Competitive closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 649–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y., & Shou, B. (2015). Managing supply uncertainty under supply chain Cournot competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(1), 156–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C. (1984). Foundations of risk measurement. I. Risk as probable loss. Management Science, 30(4), 396–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganeshan, R., & Harrison, T. P. (1995). An introduction to supply chain management. Technical Report; Department of Management Science and Information Systems, The Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghadge, A., Dani, S., & Kalawsky, R. (2012). Supply chain risk management: Present and future scope. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(3), 313–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakis, M., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 455–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, M., Lim, J. Y., & Meng, F. (2007). A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., & Fattahi, M. (2017). Investigating risk and robustness measures for supply chain network design under demand uncertainty: A case study of glass supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 680–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Y. Y., Kaplan, S., & Lambert, J. H. (2002). Risk filtering, ranking, and management framework using hierarchical holographic modeling. Risk Analysis, 22(2), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S. (2015). A critical review on supply chain risk—Definition, measure and modeling. Omega, 52, 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, D., Ammoser, H., & Kühnert, C. (2006). Disasters as extreme events and the importance of network interactions for disaster response management. In Extreme events in nature and society (pp. 319–348). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031–5069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, J. B. (1985). International supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, 15, 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, J. B. (1988). International supply chains: A new approach. Management Decision, 26(3), 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabbarzadeh, A., Fahimnia, B., & Sheu, J.-B. (2017). An enhanced robustness approach for managing supply and demand uncertainties. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 620–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2015). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kester, Q. A. (2013). Application of formal concept analysis to visualization of the evaluation of risks matrix in software engineering projects. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research, 2(1), 220–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. K., Tiwari, M. K., & Babiceanu, R. F. (2010). Minimisation of supply chain cost with embedded risk using computational intelligence approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 48(13), 3717–3739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. H. (2014). Energy supply planning and supply chain optimization under uncertainty. Journal of Process Control, 24(2), 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Fan, H., Lee, P. K., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2015). Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B., & Iwamura, K. (1998). Chance constrained programming with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Set Syst, 94, 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marufuzzaman, M., Eksioglu, S. D., Li, X., & Wang, J. (2014). Analyzing the impact of intermodal-related risk to the design and management of biofuel supply chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 69, 122–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G., Henrion, M., & Small, M. (1992). Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis (p. 155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R., & Talluri, S. (2009). Perspectives on risk management in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 114–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooraie, S. V., & Parast, M. M. (2015). A multi-objective approach to supply chain risk management: Integrating visibility with supply and demand risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, 192–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooraie, S. V., & Parast, M. M. (2016). Mitigating supply chain disruptions through the assessment of trade-offs among risks, costs and investments in capabilities. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrman, A., & Lindroth, R. (2004). Categorization of supply chain risk and risk management. In: Supply chain risk (pp. 14–27). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, P., Oliveira, F., Hamacher, S., & Almansoori, A. (2015). Design of a hydrogen supply chain with uncertainty. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(46), 16408–16418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. K., & Weber, M. D. (1982). Supply-chain management: Logistics catches up with strategy. In M. L. Christopher (Ed.), Logistics: The strategic issues (pp. 63–75). London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsson, U. (2004). Supply chain risk management. In C. Brindley (Ed.), Supply chain risk: A reader (pp. 79–96), Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pishvaee, M. S., Rabbani, M., & Torabi, S. A. (2011). A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(2), 637–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pishvaee, M. S., Razmi, J., & Torabi, S. A. (2014). An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for sustainable supply chain network design under uncertainty: A case study of medical needle and syringe supply chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 67, 14–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S., & Goldsby, T. J. (2009). Supply chain risks: A review and typology. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, B., & Brindley, C. (2007). Supply chain risk management and performance: A guiding framework for future development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(3), 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, M. A., Vecchietti, A. R., Harjunkoski, I., & Grossmann, I. E. (2014). Optimal supply chain design and management over a multi-period horizon under demand uncertainty. Part I: MINLP and MILP models. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 62, 194–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahling, F., & Kayser, A. (2016). Strategic supply network planning with vendor selection under consideration of risk and demand uncertainty. Omega, 59, 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawik, T. (2014). Optimization of cost and service level in the presence of supply chain disruption risks: Single vs. multiple sourcing. Computers & Operations Research, 51, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabani, N., & Sowlati, T. (2016). A hybrid multi-stage stochastic programming-robust optimization model for maximizing the supply chain of a forest-based biomass power plant considering uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3285–3293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabani, N., Sowlati, T., Ouhimmou, M., & Rönnqvist, M. (2014). Tactical supply chain planning for a forest biomass power plant under supply uncertainty. Energy, 78, 346–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifzadeh, M., Garcia, M. C., & Shah, N. (2015). Supply chain network design and operation: Systematic decision-making for centralized, distributed, and mobile biofuel production using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) under uncertainty. Biomass and Bioenergy, 81, 401–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, P., Agarwal, G., & Mittal, M. L. (2011). Supply chain risk management: Review, classification and future research directions. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 6(3), 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, M. S., Son, B. G., & Tang, C. S. (2012). Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production and Operations Management, 21(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2012). Mitigating risks; Managing supply chain risk (Vol. 172, p. 301). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subulan, K., BaykasoÄŸlu, A., Özsoydan, F. B., TaÅŸan, A. S., & Selim, H. (2015). A case-oriented approach to a lead/acid battery closed-loop supply chain network design under risk and uncertainty. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 340–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, O., & Musa, S. N. (2011). Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thun, J. H., & Hoenig, D. (2011). An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trkman, P., & McCormack, K. (2009). Supply chain risk in turbulent environments—A conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Energy Information Administration. (2013). International energy statistics. Available on March 2016 at http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=79&pid=80&aid=1&cid=regions&syid=2000&eyid=2011&unit=TBPD

  • Wiengarten, F., Humphreys, P., Gimenez, C., & McIvor, R. (2016). Risk, risk management practices, and the success of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 361–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G. Q., Liu, Y. K., & Yang, K. (2015). Multi-objective biogeography-based optimization for supply chain network design under uncertainty. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 85, 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yolmeh, A., & Salehi, N. (2015). An outer approximation method for an integration of supply chain network designing and assembly line balancing under uncertainty. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 83, 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, F., Wassick, J. M., & Grossmann, I. E. (2009). Risk management for a global supply chain planning under uncertainty: Models and algorithms. AIChE Journal, 55(4), 931–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M. C., & Goh, M. (2014). A multi-objective approach to supply chain visibility and risk. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(1), 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan

    Zohreh Khojasteh-Ghamari & Takashi Irohara

Authors
  1. Zohreh Khojasteh-Ghamari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takashi Irohara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zohreh Khojasteh-Ghamari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Program in Business and Development Studies, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan

    Yacob Khojasteh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khojasteh-Ghamari, Z., Irohara, T. (2018). Supply Chain Risk Management: A Comprehensive Review. In: Khojasteh, Y. (eds) Supply Chain Risk Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4106-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation