Skip to main content

The Internet Has Changed China: Ten Years of Online Public Opinion Incidents in China, 2003–2012

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Report on Chinese Social Opinion and Crisis Management

Abstract

Since 2003, Internet technologies have developed dramatically in China, with the penetration rate steadily rising as such technologies are applied in ever more areas. Not only does the Internet serve as a medium and a platform, but it has also been a vehicle for public life, the catalyst for social reforms, and the microcosm of the current state of democracy in China. The Internet has changed China. In this paper, we examine the major online public incidents that have happened in China between 2003 and 2012 in order to gain a better understanding of how the Internet has changed Chinese society. The Internet has reshaped the communications landscape in China, promoted the establishment of government information transparency mechanisms, promoted advances in the legal system, and changed the ways the public engages in public affairs. The Internet affects individuals in different ways, and at the same time, it is also changing the contours of Chinese society imperceptibly but surely over time.

Principal investigator: Xie Yungeng. Key authors: Li Mingzhe; Chen Wei; Zheng Guangjia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Li, H., and Deng, J. (2009). “Government Crisis Management and Countermeasures Online”. Intelligence, 2009:32.

  2. 2.

    The Beijing News (2013).

  3. 3.

    See Footnote 2.

  4. 4.

    See Footnote 2.

  5. 5.

    Beijing Times (2004).

  6. 6.

    Chen, Hongmei (2005). “‘BMW Traffic Case’ on the BBS?”. Journalism and Communication, 2005 no. 2.

  7. 7.

    Zhou, Lijun (2004), “‘Stepping Up’ After the ‘BMW Traffic Case’”. China Youth Daily, 9 January 2004.

  8. 8.

    Hu, Lingxia (2013). “A Discussion on Restoring Government Image Through Crisis Communications, With the 2005 Songhua River Pollution Case as Case Study”. Journal of the Jiangxi Youth Vocational College, 2013 no. 1.

  9. 9.

    Ni, Mingsheng (2008). “The Expression of the People's Political Opinions in Blogs”. People's Tribune, 2008 no. 22.

  10. 10.

    Wu, H.; Wei, W.; and Lv, X. (2007). “New Media and the Expression of Public Opinion: the examples of the Xiamen PX incident and the South China Tiger incident”. Chinese Businessman, 2007 no. 22.

  11. 11.

    Xu, R., and Xu, Y. (2008). “New-Style Democracy Created by the Internet: From the Case of the Husband Causing Pregnant Wife's Death by Refusing to Sign Authorization for Medical Treatment to the South China Tiger Incident”. Procuratorial Daily, 14 July 2008.

  12. 12.

    Du, Junfei (2008). “‘The South China Tiger Incident’: Explaining and Evaluating Citizen Journalism”. Shanghai Journalism Review, 2008 no. 1.

  13. 13.

    China Youth Daily (2012). “Guizhou Official Reflects on the Weng’an Incident: accrual of people’s grievances caused by hostility in thinking”. 27 April 2012.

  14. 14.

    Miao, Fengjun (2012), “A Rudely Awakened China Reflects on the Weng’an Incident”. www.Jxsr.jxnews.com.cn, 10 September 2012.

  15. 15.

    China Newsweek. “Insider’s Look at the Three Autopsies on Li Shufen, Young Female Victim at Center of the Weng’an Incident”.

  16. 16.

    Xinhua News (2008).

  17. 17.

    Chinanews.com (2008). “Guizhou Reports the Facts of the 28 June Incident of Mass Violence”. 1 July 2008.

  18. 18.

    Hu, Zijing (2008). “Handling of Key Details in Weng’an Incident Inappropriate”. Legal Daily, 10 July 2008.

  19. 19.

    Chinanews.com (2008). “Weng’an Officials Free Up Media Reporting in Response to Crisis of Trust”. 9 July 2008.

  20. 20.

    Liang (2006).

  21. 21.

    Jiang (2008).

  22. 22.

    See Footnote 21.

  23. 23.

    Qu, Hui (2013). “Pushing the Heavy Body of the Law Forward on the Tenth Anniversary of Sun Zhigang's Death”. Spring Breeze, 2013:3.

  24. 24.

    Zhou, Dongfei (2013). “Tenth Anniversary of the Sun Zhigang Case”. Morning Herald, 20 March 2013.

  25. 25.

    Wu, Qiong (2004). “Examining Media New Investigations from the ‘Xi’an BMW Lottery Case'”. Shanghai Journalism Review, 2004 no. 10.

  26. 26.

    See Footnote 25.

  27. 27.

    Chen, J., and Ran, K. (2006). “The Power of the Masses: the production and dissolution of a temporary kind of power relations”. Youth Studies, 2006 no. 11.

  28. 28.

    Eastday.com (2004).

  29. 29.

    Sohu.com (2004).

  30. 30.

    Zhang, Qinghua (2009). “Examining the Strengthening of Online Public Opinion and Oversight Function from the Results of the ‘Hide-and-Seek Case’”. Journalism Communication, 2009 no. 8.

  31. 31.

    Shi, Xiaodong (2009). “From ‘Grassroots Media’ to ‘Mainstream Platforms of Expression': Examining the Oversight Powers of the Internet from the Perspective of the ‘Hide-and-Seek Case’”. Journalism Lover, 2009 no. 9.

  32. 32.

    See Footnote 30.

  33. 33.

    See Footnote 30.

  34. 34.

    Wang (2013).

  35. 35.

    Southern Metropolis Daily (2013). “The Difficult ‘Tang Hui Case', May True Justice Prevail”. 13 April 2013.

  36. 36.

    See Footnote 35.

  37. 37.

    Chinareviewnews.com. “Tang Hui Case Shows Flaws of Petition System”.

  38. 38.

    Qin, Qianhong (2013). “Looking at Reforms of the Labor Reeducation System Through the Prism of the Tang Hui Case”. Hubei Daily, 29 April 2013, page 3.

  39. 39.

    Cheng, Guo (2010). “An Analysis of the Role of the Media in China's Legal Development Since the Introduction of the Reform and Opening-up Policy”. Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2010 no. 2.

  40. 40.

    Southern Metropolis Daily (2008). “Ten Major Blogs: Blogs are not ‘private land plots’”. 13 January 2008.

  41. 41.

    “The Landmark Significance of the South China Tiger Incident”. NetEase Blogs, 9 March 2008. http://adong360.blog.163.com/blog/static/2172536420082810731763.

  42. 42.

    Southern Metropolis Daily (2007). “Can the ‘Boldest Nail-House’ Restore Balance to the Law?” 22 March 2007.

  43. 43.

    Sun, C., and Wang, X. (2008). “Loufan: The Delayed Truth”. Oriental Outlook, October 2008.

  44. 44.

    The Beijing News (2011). “Sentencing Passed at First Trial of Qian Yunhui Case; Full Video Captured Using Watch Exposed”. 2 February 2011.

  45. 45.

    iFeng News (2010).

  46. 46.

    NFDaily.com (2010).

  47. 47.

    Xiao Shu (2010). “Citizen Participation in Crisis Handling in Wenzhou a Positive Development”. Southern Weekly, 31 December 2010.

  48. 48.

    Source: Yang Jianli's blog on Sina.

  49. 49.

    Yu, Xuexia (2012). “A Study of Citizens' Rights Struggles: The case of the Dalian PX incident”. Journal of the Chongqing University of Science and Technology, 2012 no. 10.

  50. 50.

    Ruan (2008).

  51. 51.

    Lin (2009).

  52. 52.

    Huang, Xiuli (2009). “Observations on the Deng Yujiao Trial”. Southern Weekly, 16 June 2009.

  53. 53.

    Zou (2009).

  54. 54.

    Li, Ruifang (2009). “The Formation of the Online Furore Surrounding the Deng Yujiao Case and an Analysis of its Characteristics”. Southeast Communication, 2009 no. 10.

  55. 55.

    Deng, Yuwen (2009). “Reflections on the Deng Yujiao Case”. China Business Journal, 22 May 2009.

  56. 56.

    Deng, Yuwen (2009). “Reflections on the Deng Yujiao Case”. China Business Journal, 22 May 2009.

  57. 57.

    Luo, Peng (2011). “Trial-by-media as a Result of the Power of the ‘Micro': Analysis of the impact of Weibo discussions on the Yao Jiaxin Case”. Contemporary Communication, 2011 no. 5.

  58. 58.

    Xiao Shu (2010). “Weibo is Magical, But We Must Open Up the ‘Last Kilometer'”. Southern Weekly, 28 October 2010.

  59. 59.

    Morning Herald (2010). “Three Hospitalized for Severe Injuries Following Suspected Self-Immolation in Demolition Conflict in Yihuang County, Jiangxi”. 12 September 2010.

  60. 60.

    Li, Kaifu: “Weibo Dissemination and Assistance in the ‘Bloody' Yihuang Forced Demolition Case”, “Weibo Has Changed Everything”.

  61. 61.

    Chen, Bin (2010). “Residents' Rights Must Be Seriously Considered in Drafting of New Guidelines on Property Acquisition”. Southern Weekly, 23 September 2010, page F29.

  62. 62.

    CNR.cn (2011).

  63. 63.

    People.com.cn (2012).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Social Sciences Academic Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Li, M., Chen, W., Zheng, G. (2019). The Internet Has Changed China: Ten Years of Online Public Opinion Incidents in China, 2003–2012. In: Xie, Y. (eds) Report on Chinese Social Opinion and Crisis Management. Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4003-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics