Skip to main content

Reminiscences of “Returns to Scale in Electricity Supply”

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Production Economics
  • 1426 Accesses

Abstract

The origins and further development of a very early empirical application of Shephard’s duality theorem is discussed. The investigation of the “Returns to Scale in Electricity Supply” was based on a cost function derived from a Cobb-Douglas production function initially. The function was modified to allow for variable “returns to scale.” Duality between cost and production then showed the modified Cobb-Douglas production function behind the cost function which was initially estimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 339.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Technical Report No, 96, May 25, 1961, of the Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University.

  2. 2.

    Carl F. Christ [1]

  3. 3.

    Zellner [2]

  4. 4.

    Berndt [3]

  5. 5.

    Hayashi [4]

  6. 6.

    Christensen and Greene [5]. “Cross-section data for 1955 and 1970 are analyzed using the translog cost function. We find that in 1955 there were significant scale economies available to nearly all firms. By 1970, however, the bulk of U.S. electricity generation was by firms operating in the essentially flat area of the average cost curve. We conclude that a small number of extremely large firms are not required for efficient production and that policies designed to promote competition in electric power generation cannot be faulted in terms of sacrificing economies of scale” (p. 655).

  7. 7.

    Shephard [6]

  8. 8.

    He was the grandson of the famous lawyer for the defense in the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire case – in case you wanted to know. Steuer, Max David [7].

  9. 9.

    US Federal Power Commission, Steam Electric Plants, Construction Costs and: Construction Costs and Annual Production Expenses, Washington, D.C.: annually; and Statistics of Electric Utilities in the United States, Classes A and B Privately Owned Companies, Washington, D.C.: annually.

  10. 10.

    Allen [8]. I am indebted to Sara Seten Berghausen, Associate Curator of Collections. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library, who retrieved my class notes and exercises for my course at Hopkins.

  11. 11.

    Nerlove [9]

  12. 12.

    Klein [10]. This paper is briefly summarized in Klein [11]. There is a more extensive discussion in Nerlove, op. cit., Chap. 4, pp. 61–85.

  13. 13.

    Chipman [12]

  14. 14.

    See Nerlove [9], loc. cit., pp. 78–79, for a more precise exposition of what Klein does. I also argue there that Klein’s estimates of returns to scale are neither unbiased nor consistent.

  15. 15.

    See Nerlove [9], loc. cit., pp. 80–81.

  16. 16.

    Chipman, op. cit.

  17. 17.

    Hasenkamp [13, 14].

  18. 18.

    McFadden [15]. Much of the core of this dissertation was later published as McFadden [16], in which McFadden generalizes the elasticity of substitution for the multifactor case.

  19. 19.

    Uzawa [17]

  20. 20.

    Arrow et al. [18]

  21. 21.

    Uzawa [19]

  22. 22.

    Christensen et al. [20]; Diewert [21]

  23. 23.

    Fuss and McFadden [22]

References

  1. Christ CF et al (1963) Measurement in economics: studies in mathematical economics & econometrics in memory of Yehuda Grunfeld. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 167–198

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zellner A (ed) (1968) Readings in economic statistics and econometrics. Little Brown and Co, Boston, pp 409–439

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berndt ER (1990) Chapter 3, Costs, learning curves and scale economies. In: The practice of econometrics: classic and contemporary. Addison, Wesley, Reading, pp 60–101

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hayashi F (2000) Chapter 1, Sec. 7 Application: returns to scale in electricity supply. In: Econometrics. Princeton University Press, pp 60–70

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen LR, Greene WH (1976) Economies of scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation. J Polit Econ 84(4, Part 1):655–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shephard RW (1953) Cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  7. Steuer MD (1951) Who was Who in America, vol IV. Marquis-Who’s Who, Inc., Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allen RGD (1938) Mathematical analysis for economists. Macmillan, London. reprinted 1953

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nerlove M (1965) Estimation and identification of Cobb-Douglas production functions. Rand-McNally & Co, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klein LR (1947) The use of cross-section data in econometrics with application to a study of production of railroad services in the United States. Mimeograph. National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klein LR (1953) A textbook of econometrics. Row Peterson, Evanston, pp 226–236

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chipman JS (1957) Returns to scale in the railroad industry: a reinterpretation of Klein’s data, (abstract). Econometrica 25:607

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hasenkamp G (1976) Specification and estimation of multiple output production functions. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, No. 120. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hasenkamp G (1976) A study of multiple-output production functions: Klein’s railroad study revisited. J Econ 4(3):253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McFadden D (1962) Factor substitution in the economic analysis of production. PhD thesis, University of Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  16. McFadden D (1963) Constant elasticity of substitution production functions. Rev Econ Stud 30(2):73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Uzawa H (1964) Duality principles in the theory of cost and production. Int Econ Rev 5(2):216–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arrow KJ, Chenery HB, Mijnhas BS, Solow RM (1961) Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency. Rev Econ Stat 43:225–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Uzawa H (1962) Production functions with constant elasticities of substitution. Rev Econ Stud 29(4):291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Christensen LR,Jorgenson DW, Lau LJ (1971) Conjugate duality and the transcendental logarithmic functions, (abstract). Econometrica 39(4):255–256

    Google Scholar 

  21. Diewert WE (1971) An application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: a Generalized Leontief production function. J Polit Econ 79(3):481–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fuss M, McFadden D (eds) (1978) Production economics: a dual approach to theory and applications. North Holland Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Nerlove .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Nerlove, M. (2022). Reminiscences of “Returns to Scale in Electricity Supply”. In: Ray, S.C., Chambers, R.G., Kumbhakar, S.C. (eds) Handbook of Production Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3455-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics