Abstract
Given the unity of language -and-world and of what-we-say-and-do at the level of the language-game , it is easy to see how Wittgenstein’s “It [Philosophy] leaves everything as it is” gave occasion to the reproach of conservatism. The chapter discusses this criticism and argues that given Wittgenstein’s profoundly anti-foundational stance this is not what his position embraces. That “Doubt comes after belief” refers to the embeddedness of our acting in a matrix of certainty ; therefore, the child is initiated in the form of life. I then focus my attention on the reception of Cavell’s position in philosophy of education debates. Questioning some of the turns this debate has taken (by stressing for example departure from, practicing freedom differently), it is argued that some authors model every relationship between a grown-up and a child along the lines of the way the grown-up is always in a process of attaining a further next self. Ignoring the distinction between the latter process and initiation results in confusions which do neither justice to Cavell or Wittgenstein ; moreover, they obfuscate relevant distinctions of the nature of education and child-rearing.
A shorter version appears in the Wittgenstein section of the Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory (Springer, 2016), co-edited by Nicholas Burbules & Jeff Stickney (Michael A. Peters, Chief Editor).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Following convention, titles for Wittgenstein’s works are abbreviated (PI = Philosophical Investigations , OC = On Certainty, PO = Philosophical Occasions), with section (§) or page number (p.), with full citation and initials in the References.
References
Burbules, N. (2016). Technology, education, and the fetishization of the ‘new’. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: Discourses of change and changes of discourse. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cavell, S. (1999). The claim of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press (originally published in 1979).
Cavell, S. (2005). Philosophy the day after tomorrow. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Diamond, C. (1995). The realistic spirit: Wittgenstein, philosophy, and the mind. Cambridge: MIT Press (originally published in 1991).
Hodgson, N. (2010). What does it mean to be an educated person? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 44, 109–123.
Hodgson, N. (2011). Citizenship and scholarship in Emerson, Cavell and Foucault. Ethics and Education, 6, 85–100.
Johannessen, K. (1988). The concept of practice in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. Inquiry, 31, 357–369.
Nyíri, J. C. (1992). Tradition and individuality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ramaekers, S. (2010). Multicultural education: Embeddedness, voice and change. Ethics and Education, 5, 55–66.
Saito, N. (2009). Ourselves in translation: Stanley Cavell and philosophy as autobiography. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43, 253–267.
Smith, R. (2016). Managing change and the language of change. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: Discourses of change and changes of discourse. Dordrecht: Springer.
Standish, P. (2004). In her own voice: Convention, conversion, criteria. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 91–106.
Standish, P. (2006). Uncommon schools. Stanley Cavell and the teaching of Walden. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25, 14–157.
Standish, P. (2007). Education for grown-ups, a religion for adults: Scepticism and alterity in Cavell and Levinas. Ethics and Education, 2, 73–91.
Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (PI§, or PI, pg.).
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty (D. Paul & G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.) Oxford: Basil Blackwell (OC).
Wittgenstein, L. (1993). The big typescript. In J. C. Klagge & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Philosophical occasions. Indianapolis Hacking (PO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smeyers, P. (2017). “This Is Simply What I Do.” on the Relevance of Wittgenstein’s Alleged Conservatism and the Debate About Cavell’s Legacy for Children and Grown-Ups. In: Peters, M., Stickney, J. (eds) A Companion to Wittgenstein on Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3136-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3136-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3134-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3136-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)