Skip to main content

Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essays on Sustainability and Management

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

Abstract

The environmental, financial, social, and governance crisis, which countries across the globe are struggling with, warns the world of a resource constrained future where progress can no longer be sustained. This has made it imperative for companies, governments and civil societies to act together to address the common, universal cause of saving the ‘People’ (society), the ‘Planet’ (environment) in the process of making ‘Profits’ (economic development). The concept of corporate sustainability (CS) has come from environmental concerns, the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has emerged from social concerns, and the concept of corporate governance (CG) has originated from agency problems. They all seem to have evolved to embrace the three pillars of corporate responsibility toward environmental balance, social justice and economic prosperity. This broad concept of corporate responsibility has almost become synonymous with ‘corporate sustainability.’ Within the overall broad realms of corporate sustainability, CSR can be narrowly looked upon as the responsibilities of companies toward the society in which they operate and on which they thrive. The concept of CG evolved around the ‘way’ in which business corporations should be managed and governed toward achieving their objectives, with the primary focus being maximisation of shareholders’ interests. In this chapter, an attempt has been made to understand the inter relationships between these concepts and their implications. The interrelationships are discussed through factors such as institutional investors, risk management, information asymmetry, board of directors, regulations, media, ethics and financial performance. A brief empirical analysis has also been conducted in the Indian corporate context to check whether CG has any impact on CS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations, 1971.

  2. 2.

    Value of the managers in the labour market goes up if their firms perform well.

  3. 3.

    Poor performing firms being taken over and the managers being fired post takeover—Morck et al. (1988).

  4. 4.

    In the foreword to ‘Global Corporate Governance Forum’ World Bank 2003.

  5. 5.

    In 2012, sustainable and responsible investing accounted for around $3.74 trillion out of $33.3 trillion in the US investment market place (http://ussif.org/resources/sriguide/srifacts.cfm).

  6. 6.

    Recent studies have found that companies which are more mature in terms of their risk management earn higher profits than their peers (Ernst and Young 2012).

  7. 7.

    http://mashable.com/2014/06/30/sustainability-consumers/#SpVNbEtPmkq9.

  8. 8.

    Ocean Tomo, LLC, “Ocean Tomo’s Annual Study of Intangible Asset Market Value—2010,” 4 April 2011, http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2011/04/04/8269063/OT%20IAMV%202010%20Release%20FINAL%204-4-11.pdf.

  9. 9.

    Like Bank of Credit and Commerce International (June 1991), Maxwell Group bankruptcy (1992), Enron, Worldcom, Parmalat (2002).

  10. 10.

    According to the Companies (Disclosure of Particulars in the Report of Board of Directors) Rules, 1988 (effective from 1st April 1989), every company is required to disclose, as part of its Director’s Report, efforts made by the company toward conservation of energy, technology absorption and its foreign exchange earnings and outgo. SEBI’s Clause 49 of listing agreement provides an exhaustive list of matters that a listed company must place before its Board and the same includes ESG issues like pollution problems, significant labor problems, product liabilities etc. In June 2008, GOI released ‘National action plan on climate change’, which intended to promote clean technology and outlined eight national missions to be worked through 2017.

  11. 11.

    The document indicated six core elements to be covered in the CSR Policy of a company and suggested that companies disseminate their CSR activities through websites, annual reports and other media. The six core elements were: Care for stakeholders, ethical functioning, respect for human rights, environment and workers’ rights and welfare, activities for social and inclusive development.

  12. 12.

    It is being developed by International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). It intends to include non-financial disclosures like those related to sustainability; risks etc. into corporate reporting framework.

  13. 13.

    Central public sector enterprises (CPSE) are mandatorily required to set aside a part of their profit for CSR activity.

  14. 14.

    Appearance in ‘S&P ESG India index’ was used to measure CSP.

  15. 15.

    http://www.unido.org/en/what-we-do/trade/csr/what-is-csr.html#pp1[g1]/0/.

References

  • Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2005). A meta‐analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Performance Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, 57(1), 8–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J. (2001). Sustainable development: A review of the international development business and accounting literature. Accounting Forum, 25(2), 128–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A. A., Jr., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Commerce Clearing House, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R. (1953) Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York, Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury, A. (1992). December. Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance (Cadbury Report). Gee, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahan, S. F., Chen, C., Chen, L., & Nguyen, N. H. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and media coverage. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Towards the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons July–August, 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. H., & Metcalf, R. W. (1980). The relationship between pollution control record and financial indicators revisited. The Accounting Review, 55(1), 168–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson P. M., Li Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30, 122–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 16(4), 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, B., & Fryxell, G. E. (1991). Institutional ownership of stock and dimensions of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 437–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, & Young. (2012). Turning risk into results: How leading companies use risk management to fuel better performance

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits (pp. 122–126). New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A. (2013). Corporate sustainability and corporate financial performance: The Indian context. Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Working Paper Series No. 721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P. A., Ishi, J. L., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39, 254–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B., & Salazar, J. D. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, H. D., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2011). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring corporate strategy. Harlow: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, G. (2009). The corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis. Financial Market Trends. OECD Journal, 1, 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2011). Corporate Responsibility Survey (2011) Marching towards embracing sustainable development. Edited by www.kpmg.com/in

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C., Dhananjay, Nanda, & Wysocki, Peter D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, S., & Sheu, H. (2007). Is corporate sustainability a value‐increasing strategy for business? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15 (2), 345–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopatta, K., Frerich, B., & Thomas, K. (2015). Asymmetric information and corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company´s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good… And does it matter? A meta‐analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance, Available via SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1866371

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988) Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2012). Sustainability disclosures and cost of capital. Available via SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2038654

  • OECD. (1999). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, France. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=C/MIN(99)6&docLanguage=En

  • OECD. (2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, France. http://www.oecd.org/corporate/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/31557724.pdf

  • OECD. (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing, Paris.,. doi:10.1787/9789264236882-en.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parigi, B. M., Pelizzon, L, & Von Thadden. (2015). Stock market returns, corporate governance and capital market equilibrium. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP10392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A., & Radiah, O. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renneboog, L., Horst, J. T., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A Resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbanes Oxley Act. (2002). https://www.sec.gov/about/laws/soa2002.pdf

  • Shleifer A., & Vishny R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. http://doi.org/10.2307/2329497

  • Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arpita Ghosh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ghosh, A. (2017). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Sarkar, R., Shaw, A. (eds) Essays on Sustainability and Management. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3123-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics