Abstract
Digital musical instruments (DMIs) rarely feature a clear, causal relationship between the performer’s actions and the sounds produced. Instead, they often function simply as controllers, triggering sounds that are or have been synthesised elsewhere; they are not necessarily sources of sound in themselves (Miranda and Wanderley 2006). Consequently, the performer’s physical interaction with the device frequently does not appear to correlate directly with the sonic output, thus making it difficult for spectators to discern how gestures and actions are translated into sounds. This relationship between input and output is determined by the mapping, the term for the process of establishing relationships of cause and effect between the control and sound generation elements of the instrument (Hunt et al. 2003). While there has been much consideration of the creative and expressive potential of mapping from the perspective of the performer and/or instrument designer, there has been little focus on the experience of those receiving DMIs. How do spectators respond to the perceptual challenge DMIs present them? What influence do mapping and other aspects of instrument design (e.g. the type of controller used and the sound design) have on the success of an instrument when considered from the spectator’s point of view? And to what extent can (and should) this area of artistic exploration be made more accessible to audiences? This article aims to consider these questions through providing a critical review of the existing theoretical and empirical work on DMI reception.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Original German: , […] Hände/Handbewegung und Zusammenhang mit Sound’.
- 2.
Original German: ‘Wie entstehen die Klänge?’
- 3.
Original German: ‘Ich wollte verstehen, wie die Klänge entstehen, also habe ich auf die Bewegungen geachtet.’
- 4.
Original German: ‘Ich fand es schade, dass zwischen Bewegung und Interaktion eine starke Lücke klaffte—keine direkte Rückkoppelung spürbar.’
- 5.
Original German: ‘Ist es überhaupt ein Instrument, wenn man es nicht kontrollieren kann und die Sounds sind nicht vorhersehbar?’
- 6.
Original German: ‘Eher ein Klang-Instrument als ein Musikinstrument.’
References
Auslander, P. (1999). Liveness: Performance in a mediatized culture. London and New York: Routledge.
Auslander, P. (2009). Lucille meets Guitarbot: Instrumentality, agency, and technology in musical performance. Theatre Journal, 61(4), 603–616. doi:10.1353/tj.0.0277
Barbosa, J., Calegario, F., Teichrieb, V., Ramalho, G., & McGlynn, P. (2012). Considering audiences’ view towards an evaluation methodology for digital musical instruments. In NIME 2012: Proceedings of the 12 th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 403–408). Ann Arbor, MI. Retrieved from http://www.nime.org/proceedings/2012/nime2012_174.pdf
Berthaut, F., Marshall, M., Subramanian, S., & Hachet, M. (2013). Rouages: Revealing the mechanisms of digital musical instruments to the audience. In NIME 2013: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 165–169). Daejeon, South Korea. Retrieved from http://nime.org/proceedings/2013/nime2013_51.pdf
Berthaut, F., Coyle D., Moore, J. W., & Limerick, H. (2015). Liveness through the lens of agency and causality liveness through the lens of agency and causality. In NIME 2015: Proceedings of Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 382–386). Baton Rouge, LA. Retrieved from http://www.nime.org/proceedings/2015/nime2015_272.pdf
Croft, J. (2007). Theses on liveness. Organised Sound, 12(01), 59. doi:10.1017/S1355771807001604
Emerson, G., Förstel, G., & Egermann, H. (in revision). Gesture-sound causality from the audience’s perspective: Investigating the influence of mapping perceptibility on the aesthetic perception of new digital musical instruments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts.
Fyans, A. C., Gurevich, M., & Stapleton, P. (2010). Examining the spectator experience. In NIME 2010: Proceedings of the 10th Internat ional Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 451–454). Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.nime.org/proceedings/2010/nime2010_451.pdf
Fyans, A. C., & Gurevich, M. (2011). Perceptions of skill in performances with acoustic and electronic instruments. In NIME 2011: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 495–498). Oslo, Norway. Retrieved from http://www.nime.org/proceedings/2011/nime2011_495.pdf
Gurevich, M., & Fyans, A. C. (2011). Digital musical interactions: Performer–system relationships and their perception by spectators. Organised Sound, 16(2), 166–75. doi:10.1017/S1355771811000112.
Hunt, A., Wanderley, M., & Paradis, M. (2003). The importance of parameter mapping in electronic instrument design. Journal of New Music Research, 32(4), 429–440. doi:10.1076/jnmr.32.4.429.18853
Jordà, S. (2004). Instruments and players: Some thoughts on digital lutherie. Journal of New Music Research, 33(3), 321–341. doi:10.1080/0929821042000317886
Juslin, P. N. (2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: Towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Physics of Life Reviews, 10(3), 235–266. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.05.008
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508.
Miranda, E. R., & Wanderley, M. M. (2006). New Digital Musical Instruments: Control and Interaction Beyond the Keyboard (Vol. 21). Computer Music and Digital Audio Series. Middleton: AR Editions.
O’Modhrain, S. 2011. A framework for the evaluation of digital musical instruments. Computer Music Journal, 35(1), 28–42. doi:10.1162/COMJ_a_00038
Schloss, W. A. (2003). Using contemporary technology in live performance: The dilemma of the performer. Journal of New Music Research, 32(3): 239–242. doi:10.1076/jnmr.32.3.239.16866
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emerson, G., Egermann, H. (2017). Mapping, Causality and the Perception of Instrumentality: Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Audience’s Experience of Digital Musical Instruments. In: Bovermann, T., de Campo, A., Egermann, H., Hardjowirogo, SI., Weinzierl, S. (eds) Musical Instruments in the 21st Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2951-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2951-6_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2950-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2951-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)