Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unobtrusive Methods

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

  • 797 Accesses

Abstract

Unobtrusive methods use ways of collecting data that do not involve the direct elicitation of information from research participants. They are useful in situations where it might be dangerous or difficult to question respondents directly or where, for one reason or another, using self-report methods will not yield reliable information. Three main sources of unobtrusive data can be distinguished: traces, documentary records, and direct nonparticipative observation. Each of these is discussed with examples of their use, as is the increasing use of unobtrusive data acquired online. The ethical challenges associated with the use of unobtrusive methods are identified, and the issues involved in their generation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott A. Methods of discovery: heuristics for the social sciences. New York: WW Norton & Company; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott A. Digital paper: a manual for research and writing with library and internet materials. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alderman DH, Ward H. Writing on the plywood: toward an analysis of hurricane graffiti. Coast Manag. 2008;36(1):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M. Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: a reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Acad Manag Rev. 2003;28(1):13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M, Sandberg J. Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research. J Manag Stud. 2013;50(1):128–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binet L. The 7th function of language. London: Harvill Secker; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard TJ Jr. Unobtrusive measures: an inventory of uses. Sociol Methods Res. 1976;4(3):267–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright J. Big social science: doing big data in the social sciences. In: Fielding NG, Lee RM, Blank G, editors. The SAGE handbook of online research methods. London: SAGE; 2017. p. 125–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A. Paradigm peace and the implications for quality. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2006;9(2):111–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan EA. Ethics in digital research. In: Friese H, Rebane G, Nolden M, Schreiter M, editors. Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2016. p. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 1959;56:81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini RB. Littering as an unobtrusive measure of political attitudes: messy but clean. In: Arkin RM, editor. Most underappreciated: 50 prominent social psychologists describe their most unloved work. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couper M. Measuring survey quality in a CASIC environment. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association. 1998; 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couper MP, Singer E. Informed consent for web paradata use. Surv Res Methods. 2013;7(1):57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK. The research act in sociology: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. London: Butterworth Ltd.; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmison M. Conceptualizing visual data. In: Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research. London: Sage; 2010. p. 233–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmison M, Smith P, Mayall M. Researching the visual. London: Sage; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding NG. Mixed methods research in the real world. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2010;13(2):127–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding NG. Qualitative research and our digital futures. Qual Inq. 2014;20(9):1064–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fooks GJ, Gilmore AB, Smith KE, Collin J, Holden C, Lee K. Corporate social responsibility and access to policy élites: an analysis of tobacco industry documents. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001076. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsche I, Linneweber V. Nonreactive methods in psychological research. In: Eid M, Diener E, editors. Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani MV, Scopelliti M. Empirical research in environmental psychology: past, present, and future. J Environ Psychol. 2009;29(3):375–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg P. Strengthening sociological research through public records requests. Soc Curr. 2016;3(2):110–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagger E. Marketing the self, buying an other: dating in a post modern, consumer society. Sociology. 1998;32(4):795–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janetzko D. Nonreactive data collection online. In: Fielding NG, Lee RM, Blank G, editors. The SAGE handbook of online research methods. London: SAGE; 2017. p. 76–91.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johns M, Coady MH, Chan CA, Farley SM, Kansagra SM. Evaluating New York City’s smoke-free parks and beaches law: a critical multiplist approach to assessing behavioral impact. Am J Community Psychol. 2013;51(1–2):254–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RK. The unsolicited diary as a qualitative research tool for advanced research capacity in the field of health and illness. Qual Health Res. 2000;10(4):555–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King EB, Hebl MR, Morgan WB, Ahmad AS. Field experiments on sensitive organizational topics. Organ Res Methods. 2013;16(4):501–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee RM. Dangerous fieldwork. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee RM. Unobtrusive methods in social research. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee RM. The secret life of focus groups: Robert Merton and the diffusion of a research method. Am Sociol. 2010;41(2):115–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Maffei G. Introduction: studying advice: historiography, methodology, commentary, bibliography. J Des Hist. 2003;16(1):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley D, Cybriwsky R. Urban graffiti as territorial markers. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 1974;64(4):491–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson S. A matter of taste: how names, fashions, and culture change. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin P, Bateson P. Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mastrofski SD, Parks RB, McCluskey JD. Systematic social observation in criminology handbook of quantitative criminology. In: Piquero AR, Weisburd D, editors. Handbook of quantitative criminology. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 225–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCall GJ. Systematic field observation. Annu Rev Sociol. 1984;10(1):263–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page S. Community research: the lost art of unobtrusive methods. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2000;30(10):2126–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer K. Documents of life: an introduction to the problems and literature of a humanistic method. London: Allen & Unwin; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer K. Documents of life 2: an invitation to a critical humanism. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, N., Birks, M., & Chapman, Y. (2014). Contextual positioning: using documents as extant data in grounded theory research. Sage Open, 4(3). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014552425

  • Rathje WL, Murphy C. Rubbish!: the archaeology of garbage. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis HT, Gosling SD. Social psychological methods outside the laboratory. In: Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, editors. Handbook of social psychology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2010. p. 82–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss AJ. Systematic observation of natural social phenomena. Sociol Methodol. 1971;3:3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez A. On the origins of anonymous texts that appear on walls. In: Lovata TR, Olton E, editors. Understanding graffiti: multidisciplinary studies from prehistory to the present. London: Routledge; 2016. p. 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe MA, Vandeveer SS, Greenblum CA, List CN, Fernandez RM, Mixson NE, Ahn HC. Persons with dementia missing in the community: is it wandering or something unique? BMC Geriatr. 2011;11(1):28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J. A matter of record: documentary sources in social research. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale C, Charteris-Black J, MacFarlane A, McPherson A. Interviews and internet forums: a comparison of two sources of qualitative data. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(5):595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trahan A. Research and theory on latrinalia. In: Ross JI, editor. Routledge handbook of graffiti and street art. London: Routledge; 2016. p. 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb EJ, Campbell DT, Schwartz RD, Sechrest L. Unobtrusive measures: nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb EJ, Campbell DT, Schwartz RD, Sechrest L, Grove JB. Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessel D. (2015). The potential of computer-assisted direct observation apps. Int J Interac Mob Tech, 9(1). Retrieved from http://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jim/article/view/4205

  • Wiid R, Pitt LF, Engstrom A. Not so sexy: public opinion of political sex scandals as reflected in political cartoons. J Public Aff. 2011;11(3):137–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles R, Coffey A, Robison J, Prosser J. Ethical regulation and visual methods: making visual research impossible or developing good practice? Sociol Res Online. 2012;17(1):8. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/1/8.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JZ. Ambient hate: racist graffiti and social apathy in a rural community. Howard J Crime Justice. 2014;53(4):377–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yampolskaya S. Research at work: administrative data and behavioral sciences research. Fam Soc: J Contemp Soc Serv. 2017;98(2):121–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeisel J. Inquiry by design: tools for environment-behaviour research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubiaga, A., Liakata, M., Procter, R., Hoi, G. W. S., & Tolmie, P. (2016). Analysing how people orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at conversational threads. PLoS One, 11(3). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150989.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK

    Raymond M. Lee

Authors
  1. Raymond M. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond M. Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Health, Locked Bag 1797, CA.02.35, Western Sydney Univ, School of Science & Health, Locked Bag 1797, CA.02.35, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lee, R.M. (2018). Unobtrusive Methods. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_85-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_85-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation