Skip to main content

Fatal Flaws in Norwich’s “Mystery of Loudness Adaptation”

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Transactions on Engineering Technologies (WCECS 2015)

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Sixty-years-worth of publications show that there is no loudness change of a tone given to only one ear. But when, additionally, a same-frequency tone is presented intermittently to the other ear (“Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balance”), its amplitude must be progressively lowered in order to have equal loudnesses at the two ears. Why? Professor K.H. Norwich calls this the “mystery of loudness adaptation”, and claims to solve it (Bull Math Biol 2010), through “mathematical exploration” of monaural (single-ear) tone presentation versus binaural (two-ears) tone presentation. Norwich’s model is carefully scrutinized here. It proves to be riddled with arbitrary claims, contradictions, and incongruities. There is an alternative, a model by Nizami which explains ten known idiosyncracies of Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Norwich KH (2010) A mathematical exploration of the mystery of loudness adaptation. Bull Math Biol 72:298–313

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hood JD (1950) Per-stimulatory fatigue. Acta Oto-Laryngologica Supplementum 92:26–57

    Google Scholar 

  3. Egan JP (1955) Perstimulatory fatigue as measured by heterophonic loudness balances. J Acoust Soc Am 27:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Norwich KH (1977) On the information received by sensory receptors. Bull Math Biol 39:453–461

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Norwich KH (1993) Information, Sensation, and Perception. Academic Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nizami L (2009) A computational test of the information-theory based Entropy Theory of Perception: does it actually generate the Stevens and Weber-Fechner Laws of sensation? Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2009, WCE 2009, London, UK, pp 1853–1858

    Google Scholar 

  7. Norwich KH (1975) Information, memory, and perception. Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Toronto, Vol. 17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luce RD, Mo SS (1965) Magnitude estimation of heaviness and loudness by individual subjects: a test of a probabilistic response theory. Br J Math Stat Psychol 18:159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hartmann WM (1998) Signals, Sound, and Sensation. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jerger JF (1957) Auditory adaptation. J Acoust Soc Am 29:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiler EM, Loeb M, Alluisi EA (1972) Auditory adaptation and its relationship to a model for loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 51:638–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Alessandro LM, Norwich KH (2009) Loudness adaptation measured by the simultaneous dichotic loudness balance technique differs between genders. Hear Res 247:122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Norwich KH (1984) The psychophysics of taste from the entropy of the stimulus. Percept Psychophys 35:269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nizami L (2010) Fundamental flaws in the derivation of Stevens’ Law for taste within Norwich’s Entropy Theory of Perception. In: Korsunsky AM (ed) Current themes in engineering science 2009: selected presentations at the world congress on engineering-2009 (AIP Conference Proceedings 1220). American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, USA, pp 150–164

    Google Scholar 

  15. McConville KMV, Norwich KH, Abel SM (1991) Application of the entropy theory of perception to auditory intensity discrimination. Int J Biomed Comput 27:157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nizami L (2008) Is auditory intensity discrimination a comparison of entropy changes? In: Proceedings of the 155th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, 5th Forum Acusticum of the EA, 9e Congrès Français d’Acoustique of the SFA, 2nd ASA-EAA Joint Conference, Paris, France, 2008, pp 5739–5744

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nizami L (2008) Does Norwich’s Entropy Theory of Perception avoid the use of mechanisms, as required of an information-theoretic model of auditory primary-afferent firing? Proceedings of the 155th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, 5th Forum Acusticum of the EA, 9e Congrès Français d’Acoustique of the SFA, 2nd ASA-EAA Joint Conference, Paris, France, 2008, pp 5745–5750

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nizami L (2009) On the hazards of deriving sensory laws from first-order cybernetics: Norwich’s Entropy Theory of Perception does not derive the Weber fraction for audition. In: Proceedings of the 13th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (The 3rd International Symposium on Bio- and Medical Informatics and Cybernetics: BMIC 2009 of WMSCI 2009), Orlando, FL, USA, pp 235–241

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nizami L (2009) Sensory systems as cybernetic systems that require awareness of alternatives to interact with the world: analysis of the brain-receptor loop in Norwich’s Entropy Theory of Perception. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Antonio, TX, USA, pp 3477–3482

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nizami L (2011) A warning to the human-factors engineer: false derivations of Riesz’s Weber fraction, Piéron’s Law, and others within Norwich et al.’s Entropy Theory of Perception. In: Schmidt M (ed) Advances in Computer Science and Engineering, Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, pp 391–406

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nizami L (2015) On mathematical biology without the biology: a refutation of K.H. Norwich’s Mystery of Loudness Adaptation and a physiology-based replacement. In: Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015, WCECS 2015, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 561–569

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nizami L (2012) Loudness ‘fatigue’ with two ears but not with one: simultaneous dichotic loudness balance (SDLB) explained. In: Fechner Day 2012: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, pp 6–11

    Google Scholar 

  23. Portmann M-R (1952) Les Fibres Nerveuses Efférentes Cochléaires. Delmas, Bordeaux

    Google Scholar 

  24. Norwich KH (2011) Neurophysiological encoding of the apprehension of physiological events. In: Abstracts of Decision Making: Bridging Psychophysics and Neurophysiology, a workshop held at University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA, March 18–20, 2011

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

My thanks to Claire S. Barnes PhD for her valuable insights.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lance Nizami .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nizami, L. (2017). Fatal Flaws in Norwich’s “Mystery of Loudness Adaptation”. In: Ao, SI., Kim, H., Amouzegar, M. (eds) Transactions on Engineering Technologies. WCECS 2015. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2717-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2717-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2716-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2717-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics