Skip to main content

Facing the Settler Colonial Present

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Limits of Settler Colonial Reconciliation

Abstract

This chapter focuses on a specific mode of domination and its contemporary manifestations. It outlines what is here defined as the global settler colonial present: a predicament fundamentally characterised by a logic of elimination and containment rather than exploitation. This appraisal of a developing dispensation is offered as a reminder of the need to develop indigenous-nonindigenous alliances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The notion of ‘political descent’ constitutes my rejoinder to ongoing contestations regarding the advisability of seeing migrants and ‘people of colour’ as ‘settlers’: yes, one can be a settler on indigenous land even if her ancestors were forcibly moved or displaced as colonised subalterns and did not establish the political regimes of the settler societies to come.

  2. 2.

    It seems important to stress that this argument is premised on an analogy. It refers not to the current occurrence of actual settler colonialism as a mode of domination but to a similarity in relationships. In this context, the eliminatory logic that typically characterises settler colonialism is replicated by contemporary modalities of domination. It is a fraught situation and an analogical rather than direct correspondence fundamentally limits the possibilities of indigenous-nonindigenous alliances. There is no assumption of a shared consciousness here.

  3. 3.

    I use the expansive first person advisedly (and so I did in the introduction to this chapter): these are genuinely global trends, the middle classes are shrinking, and warehousing is a fast developing technology.

  4. 4.

    ‘Nostalgia’ itself, after all, was once a neologism. It is significant that as a concept it emerged in the late eighteenth century during an age of revolution and unprecedented upheaval.

  5. 5.

    Even the dramatic ‘ngoisation’ of the structures of international governance can be seen as part of this pattern (see Choudry and Kapoor 2013). As NGOs compensate for the apparent failure of the postcolonial state, they become a constituent part of the global settler present in a growing assemblage of stateless ‘frontiers’.

  6. 6.

    Thomas Olsen categorises various possible types of solidarities: ‘political’, ‘rights’, ‘material’, and ‘global’ solidarity. Only the last one is not premised on inequality and ‘emphasizes similarities’ while ‘acknowledging’ differences (Olesen 2004: 259). Chandra Talpade Mohanty (2003: 502–505) similarly advocates for ‘deep solidarity’: a type of solidarity that is ‘noncolonizing’ and can be established across power imbalances.

  7. 7.

    It is significant that Partha Chatterjee’s ‘Foreword’ to Sanyal’s book explicitly mentions the ‘millions of dispossessed peasants who migrated to the settler colonies’ as one of the no longer existing outlets for the absolutely redundant (Chatterjee 2014: 12). Settler colonialism as a mode of domination was simultaneously one global result of processes of primitive accumulation and a crucial driver of them.

References

  • Adas, M. (2001). From Settler colony to global hegemon: Integrating the exceptionalist narrative of the American experience into world history. The American Historical Review, 106(5), 1692–1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, T., & Corntassel, J. (2005). Being Indigenous: Resurgences against contemporary colonialism. Government and Opposition, 40(4), 597–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allegri, G., et al. (2015). Economia politica della promessa. Roma: Manifestolibri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, J. (2010). What future for remote Indigenous Australia? Economic hybridity and the neoliberal turn. In J. Altman & M. Hinkson (Eds.), Culture crisis: Anthropology and politics in aboriginal Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. (2007). Adam smith in Beijing: Lineages of the twenty-first century. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (1989). The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literatures. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Banner, S. (2007). How the Indians lost their land: Law and power on the frontier. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2000). The brave new world of work. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belich, J. (2009). Replenishing the earth: The settler revolution and the rise of the anglo-world, 1783–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bessire, L. (2014). The rise of Indigenous hypermarginality: Native culture as a neoliberal politics of life. Current Anthropology, 55(3), 276–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. A. (2014). The Logic of Settler Accumulation in a Landscape of Perpetual Vanishing. Settler Colonial Studies, 4(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castel, R. (2003). From manual workers to wage laborers: Transformation of the social question. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravartty, P., & da Silva, D. F. (2012). Accumulation, dispossession and debt: The racial logic of global capitalism; an introduction. American Quarterly, 64(3), 361–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, P. (2014). Foreword. In K. Sanyal (Ed.), Rethinking capitalist development: Primitive accumulation, governmentality and post-colonial capitalism (pp. 9–16). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudry, A., & Kapoor, D. (2013). NGOization: Complicity, contradictions and prospects. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, J. (2016, March 14). The matter of black lives: A new kind of movement found its moment. What will its future be? The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/03/14/where-is-black-lives-matter-headed. Accessed March 11, 2016.

  • Collins, J. (2011). Global palestine. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, G. S. (2010). Place against empire: Understanding Indigenous anti-colonialism. Affinities, 4(2), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Angelis, M. (2004). Separating the doing and the deed: Capital and the continuous character of enclosures. Historical Materialism, 12(2), 57–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felli, R. (2014). On climate rent. Historical Materialism, 22(3–4), 251–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice, A. (2007). The geneology of Terra Nullius. Australian Historical Studies, 38(129), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, T. (2011). Urban futures in the age of unsettlement. Futures, 43, 432–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisler, C. (2013). New Terra Nullius narratives and the gentrification of africa’s “empty lands”. Journal of World Systems Research, 18(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. (2014). Finance and foreclosure in the colonial present. Radical History Review, 118, 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, T., & Robin, L. (Eds.). (1997). Ecology and empire: Environmental history of settler societies. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, G. (2015). Alter-politics: Critical anthropology and the radical imagination. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, G. (2016). ‘État de siège: A dying domesticating colonialism?’ American Ethnologist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendlin, Y. H. (2014). From Terra Nullius to Terra Communis: Reconsidering Wild Land in an Era of Conservation and Indigenous Rights. Environmental Philosophy, 11(2), 141–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzl, T. (1960). The complete diaries of theodor herzl. New York: Herzl Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirano, K. (2015). Thanatopolitics in the making of Japan’s Hokkaido: Settler colonialism and primitive accumulation. Critical Historical Studies, 191–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, M. (2014). Debt to society: Accounting for life under capitalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, G. (2015, November 2). Have you ever felt “solastalgia”?’ BBC News. http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20151030-have-you-ever-felt-solastalgia Accessed November 02, 2015.

  • Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Melbourne: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D., & Wolfe, P. (2015). Settler colonial logics and the neoliberal regime. Settler Colonial Studies,. doi:10.1080/2201473X.2015.1035361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytle Hernandez, K. (2016, forthcoming) City of inmates: Conquest and the rise of human caging in Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2015). Settler colonialism: Now and then. Critical Inquiry, 41, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1976[1867]). Capital. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzadra, S., & Neilson, B. (2013). Border as method, or the multiplication of labor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. T. (2003). “Under western eyes” revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs, 28(2), 499–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murch, D. (2015, August 5). Ferguson’s inheritance. Jacobin. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/08/ferguson-police-black-lives-matter/ Accessed November 18, 2015.

  • Nichols, R. (2015). Disaggregating primitive accumulation. Radical Philosophy, 194, 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, T. (2004). Globalizing the Zapatistas: from Third World solidarity to global solidarity? Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhammel, J. (2014). The transformation of the world: A global history of the nineteenth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. (1893). National life and character: A forecast. London: Macmillan & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piterberg, G., & Veracini, L. (2015). Wakefield, marx and the world turned inside out. Journal of Global History, 10(3), 457–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (2013). Creditocracy and the case for debt refusal. New York: OR Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, K. (2014). Rethinking capitalist development: Primitive accumulation, governmentality and post-colonial capitalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2013). Expelled: Humans in capitalism’s deepening crisis. Journal of World-Systems Research, 19(2), 198–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strakosch, E. (2015). Neoliberal Indigenous policy: Settler colonialism in the ‘post-welfare’ state. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sugg, K. (2015). The walking dead: Late liberalism and masculine subjection in apocalypse fictions. Journal of American Studies, 49(4), 793–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veracini, L. (2010). Settler colonialism: A theoretical overview. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Veracini, L. (2015). The Settler colonial present. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, P. (1999). Settler colonialism and the transformation of anthropology: The politics and poetics of an ethnographic event. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, P. (2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), 387–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, P. (2016). Traces of history: Elementary structures of race. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Veracini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Veracini, L. (2016). Facing the Settler Colonial Present. In: Maddison, S., Clark, T., de Costa, R. (eds) The Limits of Settler Colonial Reconciliation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2654-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2654-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2653-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2654-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics