Abstract
This paper presents a new design of a robot elbow rehabilitation: Wireless Remote Control Arm exoskeleton (WRCAE). The robot is designed for the upper limb therapy. The developed system is an exoskeleton with two degrees of freedom that can be used for the treatment, evaluation and reinforcement. The exoskeleton actuates the both movements: flexion/extension for the elbow and pronation/supination for the forearm. Angles limits (max and min) should be introduced by the physiotherapist through a Human-Machine Interface (HMI). Desired angles of the both movements (elbow flexion/extension or forearm pronation/supination) are sent remotely via the ZigBee protocol (xbee-pro communication). A kinematic model has been developed based on Denavit–Hartenberg approach to make first tests. A sliding mode robust law control has been implemented. A kinect camera was built to detect different measures of flexion/extension and send feedback to the controller. The Lyapunov-based approach has been used to establish the system asymptotic stability. Experimental results are provided to demonstrate performances of the developed robot of upper limb remote rehabilitation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allington, J., Spencer, S. J., Klein, J., Buell, M., Reinkensmeyer, D. J., & Bobrow, J. (2011). Supinator Extender (SUE): a pneumatically actuated robot for forearm/wrist rehabilitation after stroke. Conference Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (pp. 1579–1582).
Bovolenta, F., Sale, P., Dall-Armi, V., Clerici, P., & Franceschini, M. (2011). Robot-aided therapy for upper limbs in patients with stroke-related lesions. Brief report of a clinical experience. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 8, 18.
Casellato, C., Pedrocchi, A., Zorzi, G., Vernisse, L., Ferrigno, G., & Nardocci, N. (2013). EMG-based visual-haptic biofeedback: A tool to improve motor control in children with primary dystonia. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 21(3), 474–480.
Cheng, H. S., Ju, M. S., & Lin, C. C. K. (2003). Improving elbow torque output of stroke patients with assistive torque controlled by EMG signals. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 125(6), 881–886.
Cozens, J. A. (1999). Robotic assistance of an active upper limb exercise in neurologically impaired patients. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 7(2), 254–256.
Culmer, P. R., Jackson, A. E., Makower, S. G., Cozens, J. A., Levesley, M. C., Mon-Williams, M., et al. (2011). A novel robotic system for quantifying arm kinematics and kinetics: Description and evaluation in therapist-assisted passive arm movements post-stroke. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 197(2), 259–269.
Feys, H., Weerdt, W. D., Verbeke, G., Steck, G. C., Capiau, C., Kiekens, C., et al. (2004). Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: A 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial. Stroke, 35(4), 924–929.
Gijbels, D., Lamers, I., Kerkhofs, L., Alders, G., Knippenberg, E., & Feys, P. (2011). The Armeo Spring as training tool to improve upper limb functionality in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 8, 5.
Ho, N. S. K., Tong, K. Y., Hu, X. L., Fung, K. L., Wei, X. J., Rong, W., & Susanto, E. A. (2011). An EMG-driven exoskeleton hand robotic training device on chronic stroke subjects: task training system for stroke rehabilitation. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robot Boston, MA (p. 5975340)
Ibanez, R., Soria, L., Teyseyre, A., & Campo, M. (2014). Easy gesture recognition for Kinect. Advances in Engineering Software, 76, 171–180.
Klein, J., Spencer, S., Allington, J., Bobrow, J. E., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2010). Optimization of a parallel shoulder mechanism to achieve a high-force, low-mass, robotic-arm exoskeleton. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 26(4), 710–715.
Mali, U., & Munih, M. (2006). HIFE-haptic interface for finger exercise. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 11, 93–102.
Masiero, S., Armani, M., & Rosati, G. (2011). Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: Focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 48(4), 355–366.
Mavroidis, C., Nikitczuk, J., Weinberg, B., Danaher, G., Jensen, K., Pelletier, P., et al. (2005). Smart portable rehabilitation devices. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2, 18.
Morales, R., Badesa, F. J., Garca-Aracil, N., & Sabater, J. M. (2011). Pneumatic robotic systems for upper limb rehabilitation. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 49(10), 1145–1156.
Oda, K., Isozumi, S., Ohyama, Y., Tamida, K., Kikuchi, T., & Furusho, J. (2009). Development of isokinetic and iso-contractile exercise machine MEM-MRB using MR brake. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Kyoto, Japan (pp. 6–11).
Palsbo, S. E., & Hood-Szivek, P. (2012). Effect of robotic-assisted three-dimensional repetitive motion to improve hand motor function and control in children with handwriting deficits: A nonrandomized phase 2 device trial. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(6), 682–690.
Parrinello, I., Faletti, S., & Santus, G. (2013). Use of a continuous passive motion device for hand rehabilitation: clinical trial on neurological patients. 41 National Congress of Italian Society of Medicine and Physical Rehabilitation, Rome-Italy.
Patton, J., Small, S. L., & Rymer, W. Z. (2008). Functional restoration for the stroke survivor: Informing the efforts of engineers. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 15(6), 521–541.
Pignolo, L., Dolce, G., Basta, G., Lucca, L. F., Serra, S., & Sannita, W. G. (2012). Upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, ARAMIS a robot-mechatronic innovative approach and prototype. 4th IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Rome-Italy (pp. 1410–1414).
Platz, T. (2003). Evidence-based arm rehabilitation: A systematic review of the literature. Nervenarzt, 74(10), 841–849.
Pylatiuk, C., Kargov, A., Gaiser, I., Werner, T., Schulz, S., & Bretthauer, G. (2009). Design of a flexible fluidic actuation system for a hybrid elbow orthosis. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Kyoto, Japan (pp. 167–171).
Rahman, M. H., Saad, M., Kenn, J. P., & Archambault P. S. (2010). Exoskeleton robot for rehabilitation of elbow and forearm movements. 18th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Congress Palace Hotel, Marrakech, Morocco, June 23–25, 2010.
Rahman, M. H., Thierry Ouimet, K., Maarouf, S., Kenn, J. P., Philippe, S., & Archambault, M. A. (2011). Robot assisted rehabilitation for elbow and forearm movements. International Journal of Biomechatronics and Biomedical Robotics, 1(4).
Rahman, M. H., Thierry Ouimet, K., Maarouf, S., Kenn, J. P., Philippe, S., & Archambault, M. A. (2012). Development of a 4DoFs exoskeleton robot for passive arm movement assistance, International Journal of Mechatronics and Automation, 2(1).
Rosen, J., Brand, M., Fuchs, M. B., & Arcan, M. (2001). A myosignal-based powered exoskeleton system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 31(3), 210–222.
Sale, P., Lombardi, V., Franceschini, M. (2012). Hand robotics rehabilitation: Feasibility and preliminary results of a robotic treatment in patients with hemiparesis. Stroke Research and Treatment (p. 820931).
Song, R., Yu Tong, K., & Hu, X. (2008). Assistive control system using continuous myoelectric signal in robot-aided arm training for patients after stroke. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 16(4), 371–379.
Stein, J., Narendran, K., McBean, J., Krebs, K., & Hughes, R. (2007). Electromyography-controlled exoskeletal upper-limb-powered orthosis for exercise training after stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(4), 255–261.
Stein, J. (2009). e100 NeuroRobotic system. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 6, 15–19.
Sulzer, J. S., Peshkin, M. A., & Patton, J. L. (2007). Design of a mobile, inexpensive device for upper extremity rehabilitation at home. 10th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Noordwijk, Netherlands (pp. 933–937).
Turaga, P., Chellappa, R., Subrahmanian, V. S., & Udrea, O. (2008). Machine recognition of human activities: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 18(11), 1473–1488.
Vanderniepen, I., Van Ham, R., Van Damme, M., Versluys, R., Lefeber, D. (2009). Orthopaedic rehabilitation: A powered elbow orthosis using compliant actuation. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Kyoto, Japan (pp. 172–177).
Vanoglio, F., Luisa, A., Garofali, F., & Mora, C. (2013). Evaluation of the effectiveness of Gloreha (Hand Rehabilitation Glove) on hemiplegic patients. Pilot study. XIII Congress of Italian Society of Neurorehabilitation, Bari-Italy.
Varalta, V., Smania, N., Geroin, C., Fonte, C., Gandolfi, M., & Picelli, A., et al. (2013). Effects of passive rehabilitation of the upper limb with robotic device Gloreha on visual-spatial and attentive exploration capacities of patients with stroke issues. XIII Congress of Italian Society of Neurorehabilitation, Bari-Italy.
Weinland, D., Ronfard, R., & Boyer, E. (2011). A survey of vision-based methods for action representation, segmentation and recognition. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 115(2), 224–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bouteraa, Y., Ben Abdallah, I. (2017). Estimated Model-Based Sliding Mode Controller for an Active Exoskeleton Robot. In: Derbel, N., Ghommam, J., Zhu, Q. (eds) Applications of Sliding Mode Control. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 79. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2374-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2374-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2373-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2374-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)