Skip to main content

NGOs and Community Empowerment in Bangladesh

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
NGOs, Social Capital and Community Empowerment in Bangladesh
  • 552 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses NGOs’ capacity for community empowerment with the evidence of two NGOs in Bangladesh, which were discussed in Chap. 6. The concept of ‘empowerment’ is one of growing interest in development discourse. It is a process through which individuals struggle to reduce personal powerlessness and dependency and increase control over the circumstances in which they live their lives. It is advocated by prominent agents in economic and social development and especially by NGOs. As a broad concept, it represents more than a simple increase in income level or access to material resources. Empowerment enables people to organise and influence change based on their access to knowledge, to political processes and to financial, social and natural resources. This chapter considers the nine domains of community empowerment suggested by Laverack (2006). These are improving participation, developing local leadership, increasing problem assessment capacities, critical awareness of people’s needs, building of organisational structures, improving resource mobilisation, strengthening links to other organisations and people, creating equitable relationships with outside agents and increasing control over management. The evidence investigated NGOs’ capacities for these components in the context of competing IK and GK approaches. The evidence found a number of areas of NGOs’ capacities for community empowerment and gathered opinions through different sources, including field data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937) was the leading Marxist theorist produced by Western Europe since Marx and Engels themselves. By 1917, Gramsci was an influential member of the Italian Socialist Party, and in 1921 he became a leader of the new Italian Communist Party (Morgan 1987, 301).

  2. 2.

    This is something that can be used for support or help and is a human-centred concept. Resources refer to things, such as money, property, assets, wealth, capital or goods, which have economic and social value. In order for something to be considered a resource therefore, it must be perceived to have some attributed value.

  3. 3.

    Monga is seasonal food insecurity in ecologically vulnerable and economically weak parts of northwestern Bangladesh, primarily caused by an employment and income deficit before aman (one kind of paddy) is harvested. It mainly affects those rural poor, who have an undiversified income that is directly or indirectly based on agriculture (Zug 2006, 2).

  4. 4.

    PCR is a mutually obligatory arrangement between an individual who has authority, social status, wealth or some other personal resource (the patron) and another person who benefits from his or her support or influence (the client) (Anthromorphemics, n.d.).

References

  • Bebbington, Anthony. 2004. NGOs and Uneven Development: Geographies of Development Intervention. Progress in Human Geography 28 (6): 725–747. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph516oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, Glen A. 2008. An Analysis of Citizen Participation in Anti-poverty Programmes. Community Development Journal 43 (1): 65–78. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsm011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhury, I. A. 2006. Sustainable Livelihoods through Capacity Building and Enterprise Development, Documenting the Evidence and Lessons Learned. Dhaka: Practical Action Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Stefan Yan-Leung. 2006. Social Enterprises and Entrepreneurs. Conference on Social Enterprise. Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, City University of Hong Kong, 6 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, Ann, Trudeau Fellow, and Jennie Sparkes. 2008. Protecting Ecosystems: Network Structure and Social Capital Formation. Community Development Journal 43 (2): 143–156. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsm007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, Eric. 1993. The Critical Villager: Beyond Community Participation. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fatmi, Mohammad N. E., and Mashrur Islam. 2001. Towards a Sustainable Poverty Forming Model the Proshika Approach. In Challenges for Second Generation Microfinance, Regulations, Supervision and Resource Mobilization ed. Iffath Sharif and Geoffrey D. Wood. Dhaka, University Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, John. 1996. Rethinking Poverty: Empowerment and Citizen Right. International Social Science Journal 148: 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Mel., Karren Healy, and Penny Crofts. 2003. Social Enterprise: Is it the Business of Social Work? Australian Social Work 56 (2): 141–154. doi:10.1046/j.0312-407X.2003.00060.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamyaran. 2006. Community Empowerment for Sustainable Development in Iran. Beirut (Lebanon): Fifth Mena Development Forum, Iran NGO Resource Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, Douglas, Anastasia Alexaki, Samual Bennett-Lartey, Kim Noële Brice, Dindo Campilan, Fred Carden, et al. 2003. Evaluating Capacity Development- Experiences from Research and Development Organizations around the World. Canada: ISNAR/IDRC/CTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Edward T. 2005. Social Enterprise: Blending Business with Social Justice—What’s Possible? Victoria: Faculty of Business, University of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., and Glenn Laverack. 2003. Building Capable Communities within a Sustainable Livelihoods Approach: Experiences from Central Asia. http://www.livelihoods.org/lessons/docs/kyrgyz_SLLPC.doc (last accessed June 2, 2007).

  • Laverack, Glenn. 2006. Using a ‘Domains’ Approach to Build Community Empowerment. Community Development Journal 41 (1): 4–12. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsi038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, Michael, Carin Smuts, and Anthea Stephens, A. 2001. Participation, Empowerment and Sustainability: (How) Do the Links Work? Urban Studies 8: 1233–1251. doi:10.1080/00420980120061007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, Abdul Hye. 2000. Social Capital Formation: The Role of NGO Rural Development Programs in Bangladesh. Policy Sciences 33 (3 & 4): 459–475. doi:10.1023/A:1004825609376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, William John. 1987. Considering Antonio Gramsci. Teaching Politics 16 (3): 301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Sarah D. 2005. Will the market set them free? Women, NGOs, and social enterprise in Ukraine. Human Organization 64(3): 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proshika. 2008. Activity report 2008. Dhaka: Proshika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvez, Md. Salim Ahmed. 2005. Building Support for a Living: The Importance of Social Networks for the Livelihoods of the Poor. In Making a Living: The Livelihoods of the Rural Poor in Bangladesh ed. Iqbal Alam Khan, and Janet Seeley, 93–107. Dhaka: University Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert. 1995. Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert. 2000a. Bowling Alone-the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliff, Benjamin. 2001. Politics, Markets, and Life Satisfaction: The Political Economy of Human Happiness. American Political Science Review 95 (4): 939–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, Susan B. 2003. A Framework Linking Community Empowerment and Health Equity: It is a matter of CHOICE. Journal of Health Population Nutrition 21 (3): 168–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tembo, Fletcher. 2004. NGDOs’ Role in Building Poor People’s Capacity to Benefit from Globalization. Journal of International Development 16: 1023–1037. doi:10.1002/jid.1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanSant, Jerry. 2003. Challenges of local NGO sustainability. Keynote remarks prepared for the USAID/PVC-ASHA Annual PVO Conference, 14 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zain, Mohamed, and Siew Imm Ng. 2006. The Impacts of Network Relationships on SME’s Internationalization Process. Thunderbird International Business Review 48 (2): 183–205. doi:10.1002/tie.20092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zug, Sebastian. 2006. Monga—Seasonal Food Insecurity in Bangladesh-Bringing the Information Together. The Journal of Social Studies 111: 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malki, M. 2006. Community development approaches: a concept note. In Community empowerment for sustaianable development in Iran, ed. Hamyaran, 50–59. Fifth Mena Development Forum. Beirut, Lebanon: Iran NGO Resource Centre.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Islam, M.R. (2016). NGOs and Community Empowerment in Bangladesh. In: NGOs, Social Capital and Community Empowerment in Bangladesh. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1747-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1747-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1746-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1747-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics