Skip to main content

Law and Business: Comparative Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management Education in India
  • 278 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is an assessment of the place of law in the contemporary business education, specifically from the perspective of Indian institutions. The chapter attempts to capture the debate on the structure and treatment of the business law and the challenges of integrating the same in the broader context of business education. A survey of the literature reveals that despite the importance attached to the study of law in the business education, there has been a literal absence of quality debate and discussion on its content and treatment in the Indian academia. Drawing on and comparing with the decades of debate in the US academia on “place of law in business school curriculum,” the paper shall start with an overview of the function and importance of law in the society at large, and specifically to the business. Thereon, the paper looks at the substantive aspects of the course on law in the business school curriculum, with the specific focus on the content and pedagogy suitable for an introductory business law course. The chapter shall also briefly dwell on the question of the appropriateness of teaching ethics through law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the UN, the Secretary General defines the rule of law as “a principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and private, including the State itself, are accountable to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international human rights norms and standards. It requires, as well, measures to ensure adherence to the principles of supremacy of law, equality before the law, accountability to the law, fairness in the application of the law, separation of powers, participation in decision-making, legal certainty, avoidance of arbitrariness and procedural and legal transparency” (UN 2004).

  2. 2.

    The law and justice is treated as fundamental institutions of the basic structure of society mediating “between political and economic interests, between culture and the normative order of society, establishing and maintaining interdependence, and constituting themselves as sources of consensus, coercion and social control”.

  3. 3.

    See also Johnson et al. (2000).

  4. 4.

    While the author understands that the “management education” is the set objective of the IIMs in India and has wider bearing than “business education,” this paper traces the narrow aspects of business education, which has been the dominant approach across management/business schools across India at the graduate level.

  5. 5.

    The accreditation process presumes the inclusion of all degree programmes delivered by the institution that permit 25 % or more of the teaching for undergraduate programmes or 50 % or more of teaching for graduate programmes to be in traditional business subjects. Traditional business subjects include accounting, business law, decision sciences, economics, entrepreneurship, finance, human resources, international business, management, management information systems, management science, marketing, operations management, organizational behavior, organizational development, strategic management, supply chain management (including transportation and logistics), and technology management. See, AACSB Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation Adopted: April 8, 2013 Updated: January 31, 2015 at 9 <http://www.aacsb.edu/~/media/AACSB/Docs/Accreditation/Standards/2013-bus-standards-update-jan2015.ashx>.

  6. 6.

    Gordon–Howell’s conclusions called for more research and less consulting work by faculty, improved regulation, fewer case studies, more theory and analysis, and more teaching of ethics. <http://www.economist.com/node/12762453>.

  7. 7.

    HBS/HLS JD/MBA programme <http://www.hbs.edu/mba/academic-experience/joint-degree-programs/Pages/harvard-law-school.aspx>.

  8. 8.

    Indian Legal System (IIMC); Legal Aspects of Business (IIMA); Legal Aspects in Management (IIML); Business Law (IIMK); Legal Environment of Business (FMS); SP JIMR; Business Law (TAPMI—3credits) Business Law (XLRI); Legal Aspects of Business (SOM IITB).

  9. 9.

    See, IIMB Courses, <http://www.iimb.ernet.in/node/5567>.

  10. 10.

    ‘Litigation Cost Survey of Major Companies,’ Statement Submitted by Lawyers for Civil Justice Civil Justice Reform Group US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform For Presentation to Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure Judicial Conference of the United States 2010 Conference on Civil Litigation, Duke Law School, May 10–11, 2010, at p. 4.

  11. 11.

    Ibid.

  12. 12.

    Introduction to business law, business law, legal aspects of business, legal environments, legal environments of business, legal and regulatory aspects of business, Indian legal system, etc.

  13. 13.

    Law schools have generally moved away from case-based method to problem-based learning, which requires students to solve problems of the kind they will encounter in the real world (Marsnik and Thompson 2013: 201).

References

  • Allen, P. A. (1984). Introduction. In A. P. Allen (Ed.), How to keep your company out of court: The practical legal guide for growing businesses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, J. R. (1991). The role of law in the business curriculum. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 9, 239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alschuler, A. W. (1997). The descending trail: Holmes’ path of the law one hundred years later. Florida Law Review, 49, 353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, C. E., Clarkson, G., & Power, R. (2006). Deep links: Business school students’ perceptions of the role of law and ethics in business, 7 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, C. E. (2010). What’s law got to do with it?: Integrating law and strategy, American Business Law Journal, 47(4), 587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucus M. S., & Baucus, D. A. (1997). Paying the piper: An empirical examination of long-term financial consequence of illegal corporate behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belton, R. (2005). Competing definitions of the rule of law: implications for practitioners. Carnegie. Rule of Law Ser. #55. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, H. J. (1961). The future legal education of american businessmen. American Business Law Association Bulletin, 5(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, R. C. (2010). The many futures of legal strategy. American Business Law Journal, 47(4), 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, R. C. (2011). Law, strategy, and competitive advantage. Connecticut Law Review, 44(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brack, A. (1997). The paradigm of managerial law. The Journal of Legal Studies Education, 15(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahoy, D. R. (2010). Assembling a special issue on law as a source of strategic advantage. American Business Law Journal, 47(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. C. (1961). The objectives of a course in business law. American Business Law Association Bulletin, 5(1). http://www.bus.umich.edu/KresgeLibrary/resources/abla/abld_5.1.26-30.pdf

  • Chayes, A. H. et al. (1983). Managing your lawyers. Harvard Business Review (Jan–Feb).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. (1999). Learning to make business decisions in the shadow of the law. Journal of Legal Studies and Education, 17, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagan, H. (2015). Law as an academic discipline. In H. Dedek & S. V. Praagh (Eds.), Stateless law: Evolving boundaries of a Discipline. Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnell, J. D. (1984). Redesigning the required undergraduate business law course. Journal of Legal Studies and Education, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, J. E. (2006). The ‘bad man’ goes To Washington: The effect of political influence on corporate duty. Fordham Law Review, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, I. B., & Himma, K. E. (2013). Introduction. In I. B. Flores & K. E. Himma (Eds.), Law, liberty, and the rule of law, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, L. L. (1950). On teaching law. Stanford Law Review, 3, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. A., & Howell, J. E. (1959). Higher education for business. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S., & Tiede, L. (2010). The rule of law and economic growth: Where are we? In The University of Texas School of Law Conference on Measuring the Rule of Law, Mar 25–26. https://law.utexas.edu/conferences/measuring/The%20Papers/ruleoflawconference.Haggard&Tiede.Rule%20of%20Law.March13.2010.pdf

  • Hart, H. M. (1951). ‘Holmes’ positivism—an addendum. Harvard Law Review, 64, 929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. L. (1979). Ch. XIII in Sir Ivor Jennings. The Law and the Constitution (5th ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, O. W. Jr. (1897). The path of the law. Harvard Law Review, 10, 457.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILC. (1975). Legal Education in a changing world: Report of the Committee on legal education in the developing countries (International Legal Centre, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, J. (2012). A new curriculum for business law: The ‘business-facing’ model’. Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, 1, 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, M. (2011). Finding the good in Holmes’s bad man. Fordham Law Review, 75(5), 2069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. (2000). Tunneling 90 American economic review papers and proceedings 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. The Journal of Political Economy, 106(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, M. (2006). A new paradigm for the teaching of business law and legal environment classes. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 23(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibman, J. H. (1992). Legal studies in business should be taught by academicians trained in law. Journal of Legal Studies and Education, 10, 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little & Daugherty (1995). Survey of Virginia corporate executives on the role of law in the business curricula. The Journal of Legal Studies Education, 13(1), 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, H. (2013). Building the manager’s tool box; reflections of a former business dean on the state of law in the business curriculum. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 30(2), 347–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malviya, S. (2016). Amazon’s net loss from India business widens to Rs 1,724 crore even as sales jump six-fold. Economic Times, Jan 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsnik, S. J., & Thompson, D. B. (2013). Using contract negotiation exercise to develop higher order thinking and strategic business skills. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 30(1), 201–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matteo, L. D. (1995). Managing the legal factor: The legal implications of business decision making. Journal of Legal Studies and Business, 4, 165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayman, E., Newer, K. (1984). Eliminating the disparity between the business person’s needs and what is taught in the basic business law course. American Business Law Journal, 22, 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. J., & Crain, S. J. (2011). Legal Environment v. Business Law Course: A distinction without a Difference? Journal of Legal Studies Education, 28(2), 149–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monseau, S. (2005). Multi-layered assignments for teaching the complexity of law to business students. International Journal of Case Method Research and Application, 17, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. F. (2000). Imagining the law: Common law and the foundations of the American Legal System by Norman F. Cantor, Journal of Legal Studies and Education, 18, 183 (book review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, G. A., III. & Melone, M. (1999). For the introductory business law course consider an in-depth study of contract law in an integrated business context. The Journal of Legal Studies Education, 17, 283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. D., & Mandel, R. P. (1992). Putting business into business law: The integration of law and business strategy. Journal of Legal Studies and Education, 10(2), 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1996). How competitive forces shape strategy. In M.E. Porter (Ed.), On competition. HBS Press Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2002). Enhancing the microeconomic foundations of prosperity: The current competitiveness index. In World Economic Forum 2012, The Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002. New York: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, R. (2002). An ethics lesson for business schools. New York Times (10 Aug)

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L. E., & Post, J. E. (1975). Private management and public policy: The principles of public responsibility.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, O. L., Shedd, P., Morehead, J., & Pagnattar, M. (2002). The legal and regulatory environment of business (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Ervin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, G. J., & Haapio, H. (2010). Using proactive law for competitive advantage. American Business Law Journal, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seipp, D. J. (1997). Holmes’s path. Boston University Law Review, 77, 515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siedel, G. J. (2000). Six forces and the legal environment of business: The relative value of business law among business school core course. American Business Law Journal, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, B. (2015). Bridging the foundational gap between theory and practice: The paradigm on the evolution of business ethics to business law. In D. E. Palmer (Ed.), Handbook of research on business ethics and corporate responsibilities (IGI Global 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2004). Report of the secretary-general: ‘The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies’ UN Security Council, 23 Aug 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyas, M., & Kadam, S. (2014). Corporate India’s legal costs increase 17.5 % in 2013–14. Economic Times, Sept 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacks, R. (2008). Law: A very short introduction. OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (1982). Learning the law (11th ed.). Sweet and Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Rajesh Babu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Babu, R.R. (2017). Law and Business: Comparative Perspectives. In: Thakur, M., Babu, R. (eds) Management Education in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1696-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1696-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1695-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1696-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics