Abstract
Social gerontology’s growth as a distinctive discipline has remained contested with continuing debates on gerontology’s limited research focus, disciplinary boundaries and inadequate theoretical development subsequently constraining the cumulative knowledge building of the discipline. Given this intellectual background, in this introduction, I assert the goal of this volume: This volume, based on original research drawing from different disciplines and theoretical orientations, acknowledges the pursuit of a common gerontological imagination by foregrounding social gerontology as an integrative discipline. A related effort has been to emphasize the importance of cultural diversity and plasticity in understanding the social process of age and aging. This introduction maps how scholars in the volume have examined the sociological question of inequality and its intersection with age, gender, health, family and social relations. In the process, the studies in this volume have highlighted the unique historical, institutional and social systems that govern the subjective experience of aging in diverse contexts globally. Specifically, societies in transition including India, Lebanon, Nigeria, Japan, China, Israel and the Europe are studied while connecting the micro social experience of aging (loneliness, wellbeing, discrimination, relationships and resilience) with the larger temporal and political contexts. In this introductory chapter, I show ways how this exercise has generated an intellectual capital that reformulates linkages between aging research and policy in innovative ways.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See, for example, a peer report publication of the NSF, The Role Of Theory In Advancing twenty-first century Biology: Catalyzing Transformative Research, National Research Council 2008), leading journals in social gerontology and sociology of aging (e.g. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences (JGSS), The Gerontologist, Ageing and Society, American Sociological Review (ASR) and the International Journal of Ageing and Later Life) through their intentional inclusiveness for theory-heavy, humanistic and interpretative research methodologies (Bengtson 2006; Hendricks et al. 2010; Kivnick and Pruchno 2011) and with the publication of the second edition of the Handbook of Theories of Aging (Bengtson et al. 2009). In fact, in the Handbook, there is an explicit emphasis on integrating theoretical perspectives within and across disciplines through a featured section on “Theorizing aging across disciplines”.
- 2.
See, for example, www.who.int/healthinfo/sage/articles_indepth.
References
Achenbaum, W. A. (1987). Can gerontology be a science? Journal of Aging Studies, 1(1), 3–18.
Achenbaum, W. A. (1995). Crossing Frontiers: Gerontology emerges as a science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Alkema, G. E., & Alley, D. E. (2006). Gerontology’s future: An integrative model for disciplinary advancement. The Gerontologist, 46(5), 574–582.
Alley, D., Putney, N. M., Rice, M., & Bengtson, V. (2010). The increasing use of theory in social gerontology: 1990–2004. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 65(B), 583–590.
Baars, J., Dannefer, D., Philipson, C., & Walker, A. (2006). Aging, globalization and inequality: The new critical gerontology. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Bass, Scott. (2006). Gerontological theory: The search for the Holy Grail. The Gerontologist, 46(1), 139–144.
Bass, S. A. (2009). Toward an intergrative theory of social gerontology. In Bengtson, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (2nd ed.) (pp. 347–374). New York: Springer.
Bass, S. (2013). The state of gerontology-Opus one. The Gerontologist, 53(4), 534–542.
Bass, S., & Ferraro, K. (2000). Gerontology education in transition: Considering disciplinary and paradigmatic evolution. The Gerontologist, 40(1), 97–106.
Bengtson, V. L. (2006). Theorizing and social gerontology. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 1(1), 5–9.
Bengtson, V. L., & Allen, K. R. (1993). The life course perspective applied to families overtime. In P. G. Boss et al (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach. New York: Plenum Press.
Bengtson, V. L., Gans, D., Putney, N. M., & Silverstein, M. (2009). Handbook of Theories of Ageing. New York: Springer.
Bengtson, V. L., Burgess, E., & Parrott, T. (1997). Theory, explanation and a third generation of theoretical development in social gerontology. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 52B(2), S72–S88.
Birren, J. E., & Bengtson, V. L. (Eds.). (1988). Emergent Theories of Aging. New York: Springer.
Chen, Feinian, & Liu, G. (2012). The health implications of grandparents caring for grandchildren in China. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological and Social Sciences, 67(1), 99–112.
Cole, J., & Durham, D. (2007). Generations and globalization: Youth, the and family in the new world economy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Cole, T., Kastenbaum, R., & Ray, R. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of humanities and aging (2nd ed.). New York: Spriênger.
Danely, J., & Lynch, C. (2013). Transitions and transformations: Paradigms, perspectives and possibilities. In C. Lynch & J. Danely (Eds.), Transitions and transformations: Cultural perspectives on aging and the life course (pp. 3–20). New York: Berghahn.
Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross fertilizing age and social science theory. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B, S327–S337.
Dannefer, D., & Philipson, C. (2010). The SAGE handbook of social gerontology. SAGE.
Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Cohen, M. D. (2009). Theorizing across cultures. In Bengtson, Gans, Putney, & Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 487–498). New York: Springer Publishing.
Dossa, A. P. (1999). (Re)imagining aging lives: Ethnographic narratives of Muslim women in diaspora. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 14(3), 245–272.
Elder, G. H. (1974). Children of the great depression: Social change in life experience. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Elder, G. H., & Johnson, M. K. (2002). The life course and aging: Challenges, lessons and new directions. In R. A. Setterson (Ed.), Invitation to the life course: Toward new understandings of later life (pp. 49–81). Amityville, New York: Baywood.
Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3–22). New York: Plenum Press.
Finch, C. F., & Seeman, T. F. (1999). Stress theories of aging. In V. l. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook on theories of aging. New York: Springer.
Frank, A. (1990). Review article: Bringing bodies back in a decade. Theory, Culture and Society, 7, 137–162.
Fry, C. (2009). Out of the armchair and off the veranda: Anthropological theories and the experiences of aging. In Bengtson, Gans, Putney, & Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 499–515). New York: Springer Publishing.
Fry, C., Dickerson-Putman, J., Draper, P., Ikels, C., Keith, J., Glascock, A. P., et al. (1997). Culture and the meaning of a good old age. In J. Sokolovsky (Ed.), The cultural context of aging-worldwide perspectives (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self Indentity: Self and society in late modern age. Standford University Press.
Glaser, B., & Straus, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine
Goodenough, W. H. (1999). Outline of a framework for a theory of cultural evolution. Cross Cultural Research, 33, 84–107.
Habermas, J. (1968). Knowledge and human interests. Beacon Press.
Hagestad, G. O., & Dannefer, D. (2001). Concepts and theories of aging: Beyond microfication in social science approaches. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and social sciences (5th ed., pp. 3–21). San Diego: Academic Press.
Hashimoto, A. (1991). Living arrangements of the aged in seven developing countries: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 6, 359–381.
Hendricks, J., & Achenbaum, A. (1999). Historical development of theories of aging. In V. L. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 3–20). New York: Springer.
Hendricks, J., Applebaum, R., & Kunkel, S. (2010). A world apart? Bridging the gap between theory and applied social gerontology. The Gerontologist, 50(3), 284–293.
Hermalin, A. I. (2002). The wellbeing of the elderly in Asia: A Four-country comparative study. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the lifecourse: Attachment, roles and social support. In P. B. Baltes & O. Brim (Eds.), Lifespan Development and Behavior, (Vol. 3, pp. 254–283). New York: Academic Press
Kivnick, H. Q., & Pruchno, R. (2011). Bridges and boundaries: Humanities and arts enhance gerontology. The Gerontologist, 51(2), 142–144.
Kowal, P., Naidoo, N., Chatterji, S. (2012). Health status, chronic conditions and healthcare utilization is respondents aged 50 and older from 70 countries in the World Health Survey. SAGE Working Paper, 1.
Kuhn, T S (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lamb, S. (2009). Aging and the Indian diaspora: Cosmopolitan families in India and abroad. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Lamb, S. (2010). Love and aging in Bengali families. In D. P. Mines & S. E. Lamb (Eds.), Everyday life in South Asia. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Lamb, S. (2014). Permanent personhood or meaningful decline? Toward a critical anthropology of successful aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 29, 41–52.
Lan, P. (2002). Subcontracting filial piety: Elder care in ethnic Chinese immigrant families in California. Journal of Family Issues, 23(7), 812–835.
Lee, R., & Mason, A. (2012). Population aging, intergenerational transfers and economic growth: Asia in a global context. In J. P. Smith & M. Majumdar (Eds.), Aging in Asia: Findings from new and emerging data initiatives. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Lemon, B. W., Bengtson, V. L., & Peterson, J. A. (1972). Exploration of activity theory of aging—activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement community. Journals of Gerontology, 27, 511.
Longino, C. F., & Powell, J. L. (2009). Toward a phenomenology of aging. In Bengtson, Gans, Putney, & Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 375–387). New York: Springer Publishing.
Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42(6), 921–936.
Marshall, V. (1999). Analyzing social theories. In V. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 434–455). New York: Springer.
McEwen, B. S., & Stellar, E. (1993). Stress and the individual: Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Internal Medicine, 153, 2093–2101.
Medeiros, K. (2014). Who “owns” gerontology? The importance of thinking beyond the sciences. The Gerontologist, 54(4).
Merton, R. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
Mills, C. W. (1959; 2000). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press. 40th Anniversary Edition.
Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., & Sherraden, M. (2001). Productive aging: Concepts and challenges. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Peplau, L. A., Miceli, M., & Morash, B. (1982). Loneliness and selfevaluation. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 131–151). New York: John Wiley.
Powell, J., & Wahidin, A. (2007). Understanding aging bodies: A postmodern dialogue. In J. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing postmodernism (pp. 27–32). New York: Nova Science.
Putney, N. M., Alley, D., & Bengtson, V. L. (2005). Social gerontology as public sociology in action. The American Sociologist, 36, 88–104 (Fall/Winter).
Putney, N. M., & Bengtson, V. L. (2008). Theories of aging. In Carr, Crosnoe, Hughes, & Pienta (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of the life course and human development (pp. 413–423), Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group.
Rojek, C., & Turner, B. (2000). Decorative sociology: Towards a critique of the cultural turn. Sociological Review, 48, 629–648.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–440.
Samanta, T., Chen, F., & Vanneman, R. (2015). Living arrangements and health of older adults in India. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological and Social Sciences, 70(6), 937–947.
Schultz, A. (1932). The phenomenology of the social world. London: Heinemann.
Marks, SR (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42 (6), 921-936
Simondon, G. (1980 [1958]). On the mode of existence of technical objects: Part 1 (M. Ninian, Trans.). Ontario, Canada: University of Ontario.
Sokolovsky, J. (2009). Introduction: Human maturity and global aging in cultural context. In J. Sokolovsky (Ed.), The cultural context of aging: Worldwide perspectives (3rd ed.). Praeger.
Stern, Y. (2002). What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the Neuropsychological Society, 8, 448–460.
Twigg, J., & Martin, W. (2015). The challenge of cultural gerontology. The Gerontologist, 55(3), 353–359.
United Nations. (2005). Living arrangements of older persons around the world. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Population Division.
Weaver, R. (2008). Bridging the social security divide: Lessons from abroad. Policy Brief Series, No. 166. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
Wong, R., & Palloni, A. (2009). Aging in Mexico and Latin America. In International handbooks of population (Vol. 1, pp. 231–252). Springer.
Yount, K. M. (2009). Gender and intergenerational co-residence in Egypt and Tunisia. Population Research and Policy Review, 28, 615–640.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Samanta, T. (2017). Bridging the Gap: Theory and Research in Social Gerontology. In: Samanta, T. (eds) Cross-Cultural and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Social Gerontology . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1654-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1654-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1653-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1654-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)