Skip to main content

Bridging the Gap: Theory and Research in Social Gerontology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cross-Cultural and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Social Gerontology

Abstract

Social gerontology’s growth as a distinctive discipline has remained contested with continuing debates on gerontology’s limited research focus, disciplinary boundaries and inadequate theoretical development subsequently constraining the cumulative knowledge building of the discipline. Given this intellectual background, in this introduction, I assert the goal of this volume: This volume, based on original research drawing from different disciplines and theoretical orientations, acknowledges the pursuit of a common gerontological imagination by foregrounding social gerontology as an integrative discipline. A related effort has been to emphasize the importance of cultural diversity and plasticity in understanding the social process of age and aging. This introduction maps how scholars in the volume have examined the sociological question of inequality and its intersection with age, gender, health, family and social relations. In the process, the studies in this volume have highlighted the unique historical, institutional and social systems that govern the subjective experience of aging in diverse contexts globally. Specifically, societies in transition including India, Lebanon, Nigeria, Japan, China, Israel and the Europe are studied while connecting the micro social experience of aging (loneliness, wellbeing, discrimination, relationships and resilience) with the larger temporal and political contexts. In this introductory chapter, I show ways how this exercise has generated an intellectual capital that reformulates linkages between aging research and policy in innovative ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, a peer report publication of the NSF, The Role Of Theory In Advancing twenty-first century Biology: Catalyzing Transformative Research, National Research Council 2008), leading journals in social gerontology and sociology of aging (e.g. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences (JGSS), The Gerontologist, Ageing and Society, American Sociological Review (ASR) and the International Journal of Ageing and Later Life) through their intentional inclusiveness for theory-heavy, humanistic and interpretative research methodologies (Bengtson 2006; Hendricks et al. 2010; Kivnick and Pruchno 2011) and with the publication of the second edition of the Handbook of Theories of Aging (Bengtson et al. 2009). In fact, in the Handbook, there is an explicit emphasis on integrating theoretical perspectives within and across disciplines through a featured section on “Theorizing aging across disciplines”.

  2. 2.

    See, for example, www.who.int/healthinfo/sage/articles_indepth.

References

  • Achenbaum, W. A. (1987). Can gerontology be a science? Journal of Aging Studies, 1(1), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbaum, W. A. (1995). Crossing Frontiers: Gerontology emerges as a science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkema, G. E., & Alley, D. E. (2006). Gerontology’s future: An integrative model for disciplinary advancement. The Gerontologist, 46(5), 574–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alley, D., Putney, N. M., Rice, M., & Bengtson, V. (2010). The increasing use of theory in social gerontology: 1990–2004. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 65(B), 583–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, J., Dannefer, D., Philipson, C., & Walker, A. (2006). Aging, globalization and inequality: The new critical gerontology. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, Scott. (2006). Gerontological theory: The search for the Holy Grail. The Gerontologist, 46(1), 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, S. A. (2009). Toward an intergrative theory of social gerontology. In Bengtson, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (2nd ed.) (pp. 347–374). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, S. (2013). The state of gerontology-Opus one. The Gerontologist, 53(4), 534–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, S., & Ferraro, K. (2000). Gerontology education in transition: Considering disciplinary and paradigmatic evolution. The Gerontologist, 40(1), 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L. (2006). Theorizing and social gerontology. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 1(1), 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L., & Allen, K. R. (1993). The life course perspective applied to families overtime. In P. G. Boss et al (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L., Gans, D., Putney, N. M., & Silverstein, M. (2009). Handbook of Theories of Ageing. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L., Burgess, E., & Parrott, T. (1997). Theory, explanation and a third generation of theoretical development in social gerontology. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 52B(2), S72–S88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birren, J. E., & Bengtson, V. L. (Eds.). (1988). Emergent Theories of Aging. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Feinian, & Liu, G. (2012). The health implications of grandparents caring for grandchildren in China. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological and Social Sciences, 67(1), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J., & Durham, D. (2007). Generations and globalization: Youth, the and family in the new world economy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, T., Kastenbaum, R., & Ray, R. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of humanities and aging (2nd ed.). New York: Spriênger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danely, J., & Lynch, C. (2013). Transitions and transformations: Paradigms, perspectives and possibilities. In C. Lynch & J. Danely (Eds.), Transitions and transformations: Cultural perspectives on aging and the life course (pp. 3–20). New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross fertilizing age and social science theory. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B, S327–S337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dannefer, D., & Philipson, C. (2010). The SAGE handbook of social gerontology. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Cohen, M. D. (2009). Theorizing across cultures. In Bengtson, Gans, Putney, & Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 487–498). New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dossa, A. P. (1999). (Re)imagining aging lives: Ethnographic narratives of Muslim women in diaspora. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 14(3), 245–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H. (1974). Children of the great depression: Social change in life experience. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H., & Johnson, M. K. (2002). The life course and aging: Challenges, lessons and new directions. In R. A. Setterson (Ed.), Invitation to the life course: Toward new understandings of later life (pp. 49–81). Amityville, New York: Baywood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3–22). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, C. F., & Seeman, T. F. (1999). Stress theories of aging. In V. l. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook on theories of aging. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. (1990). Review article: Bringing bodies back in a decade. Theory, Culture and Society, 7, 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, C. (2009). Out of the armchair and off the veranda: Anthropological theories and the experiences of aging. In Bengtson, Gans, Putney, & Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 499–515). New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, C., Dickerson-Putman, J., Draper, P., Ikels, C., Keith, J., Glascock, A. P., et al. (1997). Culture and the meaning of a good old age. In J. Sokolovsky (Ed.), The cultural context of aging-worldwide perspectives (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self Indentity: Self and society in late modern age. Standford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Straus, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, W. H. (1999). Outline of a framework for a theory of cultural evolution. Cross Cultural Research, 33, 84–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1968). Knowledge and human interests. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagestad, G. O., & Dannefer, D. (2001). Concepts and theories of aging: Beyond microfication in social science approaches. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and social sciences (5th ed., pp. 3–21). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, A. (1991). Living arrangements of the aged in seven developing countries: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 6, 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, J., & Achenbaum, A. (1999). Historical development of theories of aging. In V. L. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 3–20). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, J., Applebaum, R., & Kunkel, S. (2010). A world apart? Bridging the gap between theory and applied social gerontology. The Gerontologist, 50(3), 284–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, A. I. (2002). The wellbeing of the elderly in Asia: A Four-country comparative study. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the lifecourse: Attachment, roles and social support. In P. B. Baltes & O. Brim (Eds.), Lifespan Development and Behavior, (Vol. 3, pp. 254–283). New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivnick, H. Q., & Pruchno, R. (2011). Bridges and boundaries: Humanities and arts enhance gerontology. The Gerontologist, 51(2), 142–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowal, P., Naidoo, N., Chatterji, S. (2012). Health status, chronic conditions and healthcare utilization is respondents aged 50 and older from 70 countries in the World Health Survey. SAGE Working Paper, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T S (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. (2009). Aging and the Indian diaspora: Cosmopolitan families in India and abroad. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. (2010). Love and aging in Bengali families. In D. P. Mines & S. E. Lamb (Eds.), Everyday life in South Asia. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. (2014). Permanent personhood or meaningful decline? Toward a critical anthropology of successful aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 29, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, P. (2002). Subcontracting filial piety: Elder care in ethnic Chinese immigrant families in California. Journal of Family Issues, 23(7), 812–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R., & Mason, A. (2012). Population aging, intergenerational transfers and economic growth: Asia in a global context. In J. P. Smith & M. Majumdar (Eds.), Aging in Asia: Findings from new and emerging data initiatives. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon, B. W., Bengtson, V. L., & Peterson, J. A. (1972). Exploration of activity theory of aging—activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement community. Journals of Gerontology, 27, 511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino, C. F., & Powell, J. L. (2009). Toward a phenomenology of aging. In Bengtson, Gans, Putney, & Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 375–387). New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42(6), 921–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, V. (1999). Analyzing social theories. In V. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 434–455). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, B. S., & Stellar, E. (1993). Stress and the individual: Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Internal Medicine, 153, 2093–2101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, K. (2014). Who “owns” gerontology? The importance of thinking beyond the sciences. The Gerontologist, 54(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959; 2000). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press. 40th Anniversary Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., & Sherraden, M. (2001). Productive aging: Concepts and challenges. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A., Miceli, M., & Morash, B. (1982). Loneliness and selfevaluation. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 131–151). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J., & Wahidin, A. (2007). Understanding aging bodies: A postmodern dialogue. In J. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing postmodernism (pp. 27–32). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putney, N. M., Alley, D., & Bengtson, V. L. (2005). Social gerontology as public sociology in action. The American Sociologist, 36, 88–104 (Fall/Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putney, N. M., & Bengtson, V. L. (2008). Theories of aging. In Carr, Crosnoe, Hughes, & Pienta (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of the life course and human development (pp. 413–423), Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojek, C., & Turner, B. (2000). Decorative sociology: Towards a critique of the cultural turn. Sociological Review, 48, 629–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samanta, T., Chen, F., & Vanneman, R. (2015). Living arrangements and health of older adults in India. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological and Social Sciences, 70(6), 937–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. (1932). The phenomenology of the social world. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, SR (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42 (6), 921-936

    Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (1980 [1958]). On the mode of existence of technical objects: Part 1 (M. Ninian, Trans.). Ontario, Canada: University of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolovsky, J. (2009). Introduction: Human maturity and global aging in cultural context. In J. Sokolovsky (Ed.), The cultural context of aging: Worldwide perspectives (3rd ed.). Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Y. (2002). What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the Neuropsychological Society, 8, 448–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twigg, J., & Martin, W. (2015). The challenge of cultural gerontology. The Gerontologist, 55(3), 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2005). Living arrangements of older persons around the world. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Population Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. (2008). Bridging the social security divide: Lessons from abroad. Policy Brief Series, No. 166. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, R., & Palloni, A. (2009). Aging in Mexico and Latin America. In International handbooks of population (Vol. 1, pp. 231–252). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yount, K. M. (2009). Gender and intergenerational co-residence in Egypt and Tunisia. Population Research and Policy Review, 28, 615–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tannistha Samanta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Samanta, T. (2017). Bridging the Gap: Theory and Research in Social Gerontology. In: Samanta, T. (eds) Cross-Cultural and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Social Gerontology . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1654-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1654-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1653-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1654-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics