Skip to main content

The Analysis to Influencing Factors on the Technological Innovation Based on the Patent Maintenance Time

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Maintenance Time and the Industry Development of Patents
  • 595 Accesses

Abstract

Compared with the numbers of patent applications and patent granted, the numbers of valid patents and their maintenance times can better embody one country’s technological innovation capability. In this book, 2921 patents, which granted by the State Intellectual Property Office in China in 1994 and up to April 30, 2007 terminated due to unpaid fees, are analyzed based on the patent information perspective by multivariate linear regression using SPSS software (11.5). The results show that the average maintenance time of patents, which granted by the State Intellectual Property Office, is shorter and the terminated speed quicker. The effecting degrees of a nationality of applicants, a examination time, a types of patentees, a number of inventors and a claims number of patents on the paten maintenance time followed by weakening.

This paper was published at 2008 International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling. when it was published in this time, a few content have been revised. Author is Yongzhong Qiao.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mansfield, E. Technical change and the rate of imitation [J]. Econometrica, 1961, 29:741–766.

  2. 2.

    Silverberg, G., Dosi, G., Orsenigo, L. Innovation, diversity and diffusion: a self-organisation model [J]. The Economic Journal, 1988, 98:1032–1054.

  3. 3.

    Andersen, B. The hunt for S-shaped growth paths in technological innovation: a patent study [J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1999, 9:487–526.

  4. 4.

    Agarwal, R. Evolutionary trends of industry variables [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1998, 16(4):511–525.

  5. 5.

    McGahan, A., Silverman, B. How does innovative activity change as industries mature? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001, 19(3):1141–1160.

  6. 6.

    In China, patent includes invention patent, utility models patent and design patent. Because utility models patent and design patent need not substantive examination, so many scholars at home and abroad believe the quantity of inventions patents is one of indicators to measure the innovation capability of enterprises, a region and a nation. Therefore, in this book “patent” just refers to invention patent.

  7. 7.

    Ford, D., Ryan, C. Taking technology to market. Harvard Business Review, 1981, 59 (3):17–126.

  8. 8.

    Jaffe, A.B. The US patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process. Research Policy, 2000, 29(4–5):531–557.

  9. 9.

    O’Donoghue, T., Scotchmer, S. Thisse, J.-F. Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 1998, 7:1–32.

  10. 10.

    Markman, G.D., et al. Patents as Surrogates for Inimitable and Non-Substitutable Resources. Journal of Management, 2004, 30 (4):529–544.

  11. 11.

    Abraham B.P., Moitra S.D. Innovation assessment through patent analysis. Technovation, 2001, (21):245–252.

  12. 12.

    Paci R., Sassu A. International patents and national technological specialization. Technovation, 1997, 17(1):25–38.

  13. 13.

    Tong & Frame J.D. Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data [J].Research Policy, 1995, 23 (2):133–141.

  14. 14.

    See Sect. 1.2.1.

  15. 15.

    See Sect. 1.2.2.

  16. 16.

    There is only 1 patent terminated by the declaration of abandonment, while 2921 were terminated for failure to pay maintenance fees. So the terminated patents mentioned hereinafter should mean the patents terminated for failure to pay maintenance fees unless there is a specific explanation, and the maintenance time of patents means the period from grant to termination for failure to pay maintenance fees.

  17. 17.

    Kimberly A. Moore. Worthless Patents. George Mason University School of Law, Working paper Series, 2005, 15.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongzhong Qiao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Qiao, Y. (2017). The Analysis to Influencing Factors on the Technological Innovation Based on the Patent Maintenance Time. In: Qiao, Y. (eds) Maintenance Time and the Industry Development of Patents. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1621-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics