Skip to main content

Automated Theorem Finding by Forward Reasoning Based on Strong Relevant Logic: A Case Study in Tarski’s Geometry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 393))

Abstract

The problem of automated theorem finding is one of 33 basic research problems in automated reasoning which was originally proposed by Wos. The problem is still an open problem until now. To solve the problem, a systematic methodology with forward reasoning based on strong relevant logic has been proposed. This paper presents a case study of automated theorem finding in Tarski’s Geometry to show the generality of the methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wos L (1988) Automated reasoning: 33 basic research problem. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wos L (1993) The problem of automated theorem finding. J Autom Reasoning 10(1):137–138

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Gao H, Goto Y, Cheng J (2014) A systematic methodology for automated theorem finding. Theoret Comput Sci 554:2–21

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao H, Goto Y, Cheng J (2014) Research on automated theorem finding: current state and future directions. In: Proceedings of the 9th FTRA international conference, FutureTech 2014, LNEE, vol 309. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  5. Colton S, Meier A, Sorge V, McCasland R (2004) Automatic generation of classification theorems for finite algebras. In: Automated reasoning, LNCS, vol 3097. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 400–414

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCasland R, Bundy A, Autexier S (2007) Automated discovery of inductive theorems. J Stud Logic Grammar Rhetoric 10(23):135–149

    Google Scholar 

  7. Recio T, Velez MZ (1999) Automatic discovery of theorems in elementary geometry. J Autom Reasoning 23(1):63–82

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang P, Lin F (2011) Discovering theorems in game theory: two-person games with unique pure nash equilibrium payoffs. Artif Intell 175(14):2010–2020

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng J (1994) A relevant logic approach to automated theorem finding. In: The workshop on automated theorem proving attached to international symposium on fifth generation computer systems, pp 8–15

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng J (1995) Entailment calculus as the logical basis of automated theorem finding in scientific discovery. In: Systematic methods of scientific discovery: papers from the 1995 spring symposium, AAAI Press—American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng J (2000) A strong relevant logic model of epistemic processes in scientific discovery. In: Information modelling and knowledge bases XI. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol 61. IOS Press, pp. 136–159

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao H, Goto Y, Cheng J (2015) Automated theorem finding by forward reasoning based on strong relevant logic: a case study in graph theory. In: Advanced multimedia and ubiquitous engineering—future information technology, LNEE, vol 352. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 23–30

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tarski A, Givant S (1999) Tarski’s system of geometry. Bull Symbolic Logic 5(2):175–214

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Quaife A (1992) Automated development of fundamental mathematical theories. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng J, Nara S, Goto Y (2007) FreeEnCal: a forward reasoning engine with general-purpose. In: The 11th international conference on knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems, LNCS (LNAI), vol 4693. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 444–452

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng J (2007) A semilattice model for the theory grid. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on semantics, knowledge and grid, IEEE Computer Society, pp 152–157

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingde Cheng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gao, H., Cheng, J. (2016). Automated Theorem Finding by Forward Reasoning Based on Strong Relevant Logic: A Case Study in Tarski’s Geometry. In: Park, J., Jin, H., Jeong, YS., Khan, M. (eds) Advanced Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 393. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1536-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1536-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1535-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1536-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics