Abstract
Since The Teaching Gap, authored by Stigler and Hiebert, was published in 1999, Japanese lesson study as a form of teacher development has been adapted by many teachers and school districts around the world (Huang & Shimizu, 2016). Lesson study challenged the traditional way of teacher professional development, most of which were snapshot workshops to tell teachers what to do on some designated days during a school year.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashlock, R. D. (1990). Error patterns in computation. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Ball, D. L. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 132–144.
Barash, A., & Klein, R. (1996). Seventh grades students’ algorithmic, intuitive and formal knowledge of multiplication and division of non negative rational numbers. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 35–42). Valencia, Spain: University of Valencia.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C.A., Underhill, R., Jones. D., & Agard, P. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194–222.
Carpenter, T. C., Lindquist, M. M., Brown, C. A., Kouba, V. L., Silver, E. A., & Swafford, J. O. (1988). Results of the fourth NAEP assessment of mathematics: Trends and conclusions. Arithmetic Teacher, 36(4), 38–41.
Cirillo, M. (2013). What does research say the benefits of discussion in mathematics class are? (Research Brief No. 19). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.blockfest.org/research-brief-19-benefit-of-discussion.pdf
Clements, D., Sarama, J., Spitler, M., Lange, A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 127–166.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning community. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.
Cramer, K., Wyberg, T., & Leavitt, S. (2008). The role of representations in fraction addition and subtraction. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13, 490–496.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council. Retrieved from http://learningforward.org/docs/pdf/nsdcstudy2009.pdf
Daro, P., Mosher, F., & Corcoran, T. (2011). Learning trajectories in mathematics (Research Report No. 68). Madison, WI: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Fendel, D. M. (1987). Understanding the structure of elementary school mathematics. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Franke, M., Kazemi, E., Shih, J., Biagetti, S., & Battey, D. (2005). Changing teachers’ professional work in mathematics: One school’s journey. In T. A. Romberg, T. P. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 209–229). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
Gearhart, M., Leveille Buchanan, N., Collett, J., Diakow, R., Kang, B., Saxe, G. B., & McGee, A. (2014). Identifying opportunities to learn in mathematics discussions in heterogeneous elementary classrooms (Unpublished manuscript). University of California, Berkeley, CA. Retrieved from http://www.culturecognition.com/lmr/sites/default/files/Identifying%20opportunities%20LMR%20June2014.pdf
Gu, F., & Gu, L. (2016). Characterizing mathematics teaching research mentoring in the context of Chinese lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 441–454.
Gu, L., Huang, R., & Marton, F. (2004). Teaching with variation: An effective way of mathematics teaching in China. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 309–348). Singapore: World Scientific.
Grossman, P. L., Wineburg, S. S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942–1012.
Han, X., & Paine, L. (2010). Teaching mathematics as deliberate practice through public lessons. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 519–541.
Hart, L. C., Alston, A. S., & Murata, A. (2011). Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together. New York, NY: Springer.
Huang, R., & Bao, J. (2006). Towards a model for teacher’s professional development in China: Introducing keli. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 279–298.
Huang, R., & Han, X. (2015). Improving teaching and enhancing teachers’ growth through parallel lessons development: A Chinese approach. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4, 100–117.
Huang, R., & Shimizu, Y. (2016). Improving teaching and learning, developing teachers and teacher developers, and linking theory and practice through lesson study in mathematics: An international perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 393–409.
Huang, R., Su, H., & Xu, S. (2014). Developing teachers’ and teaching researchers’ professional competence in mathematics through Chinese Lesson Study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46, 239–251.
Lewis, C., & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Lewis, C., & Perry, R. (2015). A randomized trial of lesson study with mathematical resource kits: Analysis of impact on teachers’ beliefs and learning community. In J. Middleton, J. Cai, & S. Hwang (Eds.), Large-scale studies in mathematics education (pp. 133–158). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Lewis, C., Perry, R., Friedkin, S., & Roth, J. (2012). Improving teaching does improve teachers: Evidence from lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 368–375.
Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917–46.
Lo, M. L., & Marton, F. (2012) Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1, 7–22.
Ma, L. P. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. London: Routledge.
Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Science, 15, 193–220.
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
Ott, J. M., Snook, D. L., & Gibson, D. L. (1991). Understanding partitive division of fractions. The Arithmetic Teacher, 39, 7–11.
Payne, J. N. (1976). Review of research on fractions. In R. Lesh (Ed.), Number and measurement (pp. 145–188). Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
Perry, R. R., & Lewis, C. C. (2011). Improving the mathematical content base of lesson study summary of
results. Oakland, CA: Mills College Lesson Study Group. Retrieved from http://www.lessonresearch.net/IESAbstract10.pdf
Perry, R., Lewis, C., Friedkin, S., & Baker, E. K. (2011). Improving the mathematical content base of lesson study: Interim summary of results. Retrieved from http://www.lessonresearch.net/IES%20Abstract_01.03.11.pdf
Petit, M., Laird, R. E., & Marsden, E. L. (2010). A focus on fractions: Bringing research to the classroom. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Desimone, L. M., & Birman, B. F. (2003). Providing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower program. Science Educator, 12(1), 23–40.
Siegler, R., Carpenter, T., Fennell, F., Geary, D., Lewis, J., Okamoto, Y., Thompson, L., & Wray, J. (2010). Developing effective fractions instruction for kindergarten through 8th grade: A practice guide (NCEE#2010-4039). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/fractions_pg_093010.pdf
Simon, M. A. (1995). Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 233–254.
Son, J. W., & Crespo, S. (2009). Prospective teachers’ reasoning and response to a student’s non-traditional strategy when dividing fractions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 235–261.
Sowder, J., Sowder, L., & Nickerson, S. (2010). Reconceptualizing mathematics for elementary school teachers. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman & Company.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: Free Press.
Thomspon, P. W., & Saldanha, L. A. (2003). Fractions and multiplicative reasoning. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), Research companion to the principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 95–114). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 5–25.
Tirosh, D., Fishbein, E., Graeber, A., & Wilson, J. W. (1998). Prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of rational numbers. Retrieved from http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/texts.folder/tirosh/pros.el.tchrs.html.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2000). Mathematics education in the Netherlands: A guided tour. Freudenthal Institute Cd-rom for ICME9. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 141–161). Reston, VA, NCTM.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111.
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014). Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79–93.
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 173–209). Washington, DC: AERA.
Yang, Y., & Ricks, T. E. (2013). Chinese lesson study: Developing classroom instruction through collaborations in school-based teaching research group activities. In Y. Li & R. Huang (Eds.), How Chinese teach mathematics and improve teaching (pp. 51–65). New York, NY: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Han, X., Gong, Z., Huang, R. (2017). Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Variation in Lesson Study. In: Huang, R., Li, Y. (eds) Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Variation. Mathematics Teaching and Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-782-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-782-5_15
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-782-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)