Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rri Bridges Science Education and Communication

The Innovator’s Perspective

  • Chapter
Science and Technology Education and Communication

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES,volume 15))

  • 400 Accesses

Abstract

The overall purpose of this book is to seek cross-disciplinary insights concerning education and communication about science and technology. Reading through the chapters of this book, multiple perspectives have been explored on both science & technology education (STE) and science & technology communication (STC). If there is one such thing as an overall message, a red thread throughout the book, it is possibly that the education and communication related concepts used in the education/communication approaches, do not have exclusive value in solely either one of these two professional domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts, M. N. C., & Van Woerkum, C. M. J. (2002). Dealing with uncertainty in solving complex problems. In C. Leeuwis & R. Pyburn (Eds.), Wheelbarrows full of frogs: Social learning in rural resource management (pp. 421–437). Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayram-Jacobs, D. (2015). Responsible research and innovation: What is it? How to integrate in science education. Presented at International Congress on Education for the Future: Issues and Challenges (ICEFIC 2015) Conference, Ankara University, 13–15 May 2015, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1999). The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Science Technology and Society, 4(82), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, J., & Martin, P. (2009). The role of social scientists in synthetic biology. EMBO Reports, 10, 201–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (2014). Are we all scientific experts now? Wiley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorn, N., & Fahlquist, J. N. (2010). Responsibility in engineering: Toward a new role for engineering ethicists. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(3), 222–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011a). Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies rields. In R. Von Schomberg (Ed.), Directorate General for research and innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011b). Horizon 2020: The framework programme for research and innovation (p. pp 1–14). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission. (2007). Opinion on the ethical aspects of nanomedicine – Opinion No. 21. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/european-group-ethics/docs/publications/opinion_21_nano_en.pdf (Accessed 1 July 2016).

  • EPSRC website. (2015). Accessed 14 July 2016. https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/research/framework/

  • Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogoy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flipse, S. M., van der Sanden, M. C. A., & Osseweijer, P. (2013a). Midstream modulation in biotechnology industry: Redefining what is ‘part of the job’ of researchers in industry. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 1141–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flipse, S. M., Van der Sanden, M. C. A., & Osseweijer, P. (2014a). Improving industrial R&D practices with social and ethical aspects: Aligning key performance indicators with social and ethical aspects in food technology R&D. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 85, 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flipse, S. M., Van der Sanden, M. C. A., & Osseweijer, P. (2013b) Setting up spaces for collaboration in industry between researchers from the natural and social sciences. Science & Engineering Ethics, 20(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flipse, S. M., Van der Sanden, M. C. A., Radstake, M., De Winde, J. H., & Osseweijer, P. (2014b). The DNA of socially responsible innovation. EMBO Reports, 15, 134–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E. (2007). Ethnographic invention: Probing the capacity of laboratory decisions. Nanoethics, 1, 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E., & Miller, C. (2009) Contextualizing the engineering laboratory. In S. H. Christensen, M. Meganck, & B. Delahousse (Eds.), Engineering in context (pp. 369–381). Palo Alto: Academica Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E., Mahajan, R. L., & Mitcham, C. (2006). Midstream modulation of technology: Governance from within. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(6), 485–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2011). Constitutional moments in governing science and technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 621–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwenstein, B. V. (2015). Identifying what matters: Science education, science communication and democracy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTiernan, K, Polagye, B, Fisher, E., & Jenkins June, L. (2016). Integrating socio-technical research with future visions for tidal energy. Paper. George Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, A. (2016). Responsible research and innovation in science education. Milton Keynes: The Open University UK – Knowledge Media Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, A., & Bayram-Jacobs, D. (2016). Opportunities and challenges for equipping the next generation for responsible citizenship through the ENGAGE HUB. Paper Presented at International Conference on Responsible Research in Education and Management and its Impact, London, UK, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). RRI: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39, 751–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P. M., Fisher, E., Gorman, M., & Guston, D. H. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. In R. Owen., J. Bessant, & M.Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation (pp. 27–50). London: John Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R., & Goldberg, N. (2010). Responsible innovation: a pilot study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Risk Analysis, 30(11), 1699–1707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patra, D. (2011). Responsible development of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Contextualizing sociotechnical integration into the nanofabrication laboratories in the USA. Nanoethics, 5(2), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RRI Tools website. (2016). http://www.rri-tools.eu (Accessed 14 July 2016).

  • Schuurbiers, D., & Fisher, E. (2009). Lab-scale intervention. EMBO Reports Science & Society Series on Convergence Research, 10(5), 424–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurbiers, D. (2011). What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 769–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherborne T. (2014). ENGAGE: Equipping the next generation for active engagement in science. http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/11469_en.html (Accessed 14 July 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz, Y., & Sherborne, T. (2015). Responsible research and innovation in the classroom: Engage RRI goals and framework. Poster presented at ESERA Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STIR website. (2015). https://cns.asu.edu/research/stir (Accessed 14 July 2016).

  • Sutcliffe, H. (2011). A report on Responsible Research and Innovation for the European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-reporthilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf (Accessed 08 January 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Schomberg, R. (2011). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode, (pp. 39–61). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, A. (2007). Crossing boundaries: Social sciences in the policy room. Science, Technology and Human Values, 32, 458–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilsdon, J. (2005). Paddling upstream: New currents in European technology assessment. In M. Rodemeyer, D. Sarewitz, & J. Wilsdon (Eds.), The future of technology assessment (pp. 22–29). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science Education and Communication, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    Steven M. Flipse

  2. Science Education and Communication, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    Durdane Bayram-Jacobs

Authors
  1. Steven M. Flipse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Durdane Bayram-Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    Maarten C. A. van der Sanden

  2. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    Marc J. de Vries

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flipse, S.M., Bayram-Jacobs, D. (2016). Rri Bridges Science Education and Communication. In: van der Sanden, M.C.A., de Vries, M.J. (eds) Science and Technology Education and Communication. International Technology Education Studies, vol 15. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-738-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-738-2_9

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-738-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation