Abstract
Creating context-based learning environments has appeared to be quite a difficult problem (Pilot & Bulte, 2006). For teachers it involves a change in pedagogical approach and content to teach within a new vision on the goals and emphasis in science education. The research described in this chapter focuses on the implementation on factors that hinder or facilitate the implementation of innovative context-based teaching materials in classroom practice by senior chemistry teachers who are not familiar with context-based education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice based theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Skyes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning professional: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20, 533–548.
Barab, S., & Luebhmann, A. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454–467.
Bulte, A., Klaasen, K., Westbroek, H., Stolk, M., Prins, G., Genseberger, R., De Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2005). Modules for a new chemistry curriculum. Research on a meaningful relation between contexts and concepts. In P. Nentwig & D. Waddington (Eds.), Making it relevant (pp. 121–153). Munich: Waxmann.
Coenders., F. (2010). Teachers’ professional growth during the development and class enactment of context-based chemistry student learning material (Doctoral dissertation). Twente University, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
Deketelaere, A., & Kelchtermans, G. (1996). Collaborative curriculum development: An encounter of different professional knowledge systems. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 2, 71–85.
Dobber, M., Akkerman, S., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2010). Taking group differences into account while developing sets of design principles for learning communities in teacher education. Paper presented at the AERA Conference 2010, Denver, CO.
Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., He, Y., Levin, B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 161–171.
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976.
Gilbert, J. K., Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. M. W. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context-based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817–837.
Goodlad, J. (1979). Curriculum inquiry: The study of educational practice. New York, NY: McGraw- Hill.
Harland, J., & Kinder, K. (1997). Teachers’ continuing professional development: Framing a model of outcomes. British Journal of In-service Education, 23(1), 71–84.
Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Lining theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17.
Korthagen, F. A. J., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1020–1041.
Kuiper, W., Boersma, K., & Van den Akker, J. (2005). Towards a more curricular focus in international comparative studies on mathematics and science education. In K. Th. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. De Jong, & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 41–54). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & Van den Akker, J. (2006). Design research from a curriculum perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 110–143). London: Routledge.
Meijer, M. R. (2011). Macro-meso-micro thinking using structure-property relations, an empirical study on design principles (Doctoral dissertation). University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Moore, A., Edwards, G., Halpin, D., & George, R. (2002). Compliance, resistance and pragmatism: The (re)construction of schoolteacher identities in a period of intensive education reform. British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 551–565.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. M. W. (2006). The use of ‘contexts’ as a challenge for the chemistry curriculum: Its successes and the need for further development and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1087–1112.
Pinto, R. (2005). Introducing curriculum innovations in science: Identifying teachers’ transformations and the design of related teacher education. Science Education, 89, 1–12.
Prins, G. T. (2010). Teaching and learning of modelling in chemistry education, Authentic practices as contexts for learning (Doctoral dissertation). University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 331–350.
Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the concept of “curriculum emphasis” in science education. Science Education, 66(2), 243–260.
Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 283–312.
Shuell, T. J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 726–764). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
Shulman, L., & Shulman, J. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257–271.
Stolk, M. J., Bulte, A. M. W., De Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2009). Strategies for a professional development programme: Empowering teachers for context-based chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10, 154–163.
Van Berkel, B., Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. M. W. (2009). Ways forward within and beyond the existing structure of chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert & D. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 31–54). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Van den Akker J. J. H. (1994). Designing innovations from an implementation perspective. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of education (pp. 1491–1494). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Van den Akker, J. (1998). The science curriculum: Between ideals and outcomes. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Vol. 1, pp. 421–447). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2005). The conceptions of chemistry teachers about teaching and learning in the context of a curriculum innovation. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 303–322.
Vandyck, I., Graaff, R. de., Pilot, A., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Community building of (student) teachers and a teacher educator in a school-university partnership. Paper presented at the AERA Conference 2010, Denver, CO.
Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9(3), 257–280.
Vos, M. A. J. (2010). Interaction between teachers and teaching materials: On the implementation of context-based chemistry education (Doctoral dissertation). Eindhoven School of Education, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
Vos, M. A. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M. G., & Pilot, A. (2009). The use of context-based materials: learning from German experiences with ‘Chemie im Kontext’ for the implementation of Dutch context-based units. In M. Fatih Tasar & G. Cakankci (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 ESERA conference, Aug. 31–Sept. 4, Istanbul, Turkey. Istanbul.
Vos, M. A. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M. G., & Pilot, A. (2010). Teachers implementing context-based teaching materials: A framework for case-analysis in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 193–206.
Vos, M. A. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M. G., & Pilot, A. (2011). Classroom implementation of context-based chemistry education by teachers: The relation between experiences of teachers and the design of materials. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1–26.
Yerrick, R., Parke, H., & Nugent, J. (1997). Struggling to promote deeply rooted change: The “filtering effect” of teachers’ beliefs on understanding transformational views of teaching science. Science Education, 81, 137–159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vos, M.A.J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W.M.G., Pilot, A. (2016). Interaction between Teachers and Teaching Materials. In: Taconis, R., Brok, P.d., Pilot, A. (eds) Teachers Creating Context-Based Learning Environments in Science. Advances in Learning Environments Research. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-684-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-684-2_8
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-684-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)