Skip to main content

Characteristics of Pre-College Engineering Education in the United States

  • Chapter
Pre-university Engineering Education

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES,volume 1))

  • 367 Accesses

Abstract

Any cross-national discussion of education benefits by taking account of the unique factors that shape a particular country’s education system. From the point of view of educational change, these factors often constrain what can and cannot be done; how quickly change occurs; and how likely it is that change, once begun, will endure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). (1989). Science for All Americans. Project 2061. AAAS. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Project 2016. AAAS. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achieve, Inc. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEE CMC (American Society for Engineering Education Corporate Member Council). (2008). K-12 STEM guidelines for all Americans. Retrieved October 15, 2015, from https://www.asee.org/member-resources/councils-and-chapters/corporate-member-council/special-interest-group/cmc-k12-stem-guidelines-for-all-americans-rationale.pdf

  • Childress, V., & Rhodes, C. (2008). Engineering student outcomes for grades 9–12. The Technology Teacher, 67(7), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, V., & Sanders, M. (2007, February 11–13). Core engineering concepts foundational for the study of technology in grades 6–12. Paper presented the National Symposium to Explore Effective Practices for the Professional Development of K-12 Engineering and Technology Education Teachers, Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C., & Knight, M. (2004, June 20–23). Draw an engineer test: Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C., C. Lachapelle, & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2006, June 18–21). Elementary teachers’ understandings of engineering and technology. Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Chicago, IL. (Washington, DC: ASEE.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Custer, R.L., Daugherty, J. L., & Meyer, J. P. (2009, July 8–9). Formulating the conceptual base for secondary level engineering education—A review and synthesis. Paper presented at the NAE Workshop on Standards for K-12 Engineering, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, M., DeVries, M., & Rossouw, A. (2011). Concepts and contexts in engineering and technology education: An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(4), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E.A. (2015, August 12). 20% of New York State students opted out of standardized tests this year. Retrieved October 12, 2015, from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/13/nyregion/new-york-state-students-standardized-tests.html?_r=0

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschbach, D. R. (2009). Technology education—Foundations and perspectives. Homewood, IL: American Technical Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horizon Research. (2013). Report of the national survey of science and mathematics education. Retrieved October 15, 2015, from www.horizon-research.com/2012nssme/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2012-NSSME-Full-Report1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, C., Faraclas, E., Sanchez, S., Latif, S. K., & Kazerounian, K. (2005). Engineering frameworks for a high school setting: Guidelines for technical literacy for high school students. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Conference. Retrieved from http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=21254

  • NAE (National Academy of Engineering). (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. In Committee on public understanding of engineering messages. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAE and NRC (National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council). (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. In L. Katehi, G. Pearson, & M. Feder (Eds.), Committee on K-12 engineering education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAE and NRC. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status prospects, and an agenda for research (M. Honey, G. Pearson, & H. Schweingruber, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAGB (National Assessment Governing Board). (2013). Technology and engineering literacy framework for the 2014 national assessment of educational progress. Retrieved October 16, 2015, from https://www.nagb.org/content/nagb/assets/documents/publications/frameworks/technology/2014-technology-framework.pdf

  • NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). (2014). Institute of education sciences. Digest of Education Statistics. Table 209.10, Number and percentage distribution of teachers in public and private elementary and secondary schools, by selected teacher characteristics: Selected years, 1987–88 through 2011–12. Retrieved October 16, 2015, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_209.10.asp

  • New America. (2015, June 19). Federal, state, and local K-12 school finance overview (Updated). Retrieved January 22, 2016, from http://atlas.newamerica.org/school-finance

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council). (1999). Final letter report of the international technology education association standards review committee. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, cross-cutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Retrieved January 22, 2016, from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/13165/a-framework-for-k-12-science-education-practices-crosscutting-concepts

  • Purzer, S., Strobel, J., & Cardella, M. E. (2014). Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneider, C. (2006, November 12). Draft learning progressions for engineering design. Boston Museum of Science. (Unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • USDOE (US Department of Education). (1983, April). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Retrieved January 22, 2016, from http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pearson, G. (2016). Characteristics of Pre-College Engineering Education in the United States. In: Vries, M.J.d., Gumaelius, L., Skogh, IB. (eds) Pre-university Engineering Education. International Technology Education Studies, vol 1. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-621-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-621-7_5

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-621-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics