Abstract
Over the years, the issue of students’ learning has attracted many educational researchers’ attention to investigate various factors that contribute to it. Since students’ learning is related to their academic success or failure, the role of the teacher has been identified as the paramount factor in this regard (e.g., Rockoff, 2004; Hanushek, 2011; Aaronson et al., 2007).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135.
Ackerman, T., Heafner, T., & Bartz, D. (2006, April 10). An examination of the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement. Paper presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Areepattamannil, S., & Caleon, I. S. (2013). Relationships of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies to mathematics achievement in four high-performing East Asian education systems. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 174(6), 696–702.
Artlet, C., Baumert, J., Julius-McElvany, N., & Peschar, J. (2003). Learners for life: Student approaches to learning. Paris: OECD.
Bietenbeck, J. C. (2013). Teaching practices and cognitive skills. Mimeo CEMFI.
Chiu, M. M., Chow, B., & McBride-Chang, C. (2007). Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent mathematics, science, and reading achievement across 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(4), 344–365.
Czuchry, M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1998). The generation and recall of personally relevant information. Journal of Experimental Education, 66(4), 293–315.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.
Eshel, Y., & Kohavi, R. (2003). Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 249–260.
George, R., & Kaplan, D. (1998). A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS: 88. Science Education, 82(1), 93–109.
Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261–297.
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455.
Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 466–479.
Hidalgo-Cabrillana, A., & López-Mayan, C. (2015). Teaching styles and achievement: Student and teacher perspectives (Working Paper 2/2015). Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain.
Isaacs, C., & Carroll, W. (1999). Strategies for basic-facts instruction. Teaching Children in Mathematics, 5(9), 1–17.
Kain, J. F. (1998). The impact of individual teachers and peers on individual student achievement. Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management 20th Annual Research Conference, New York, NY.
Kang, D. H. (1997). Assessing Korean middle school students’ language learning strategies in input-poor environments. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from ERIC database.
Kaur, B., & Areepattamannil, S. (2012). Influences of metacognitive and self-regulated learning strategies for reading on mathematical literacy of adolescents in Australia and Singapore. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding horizons (Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia). Singapore: MERGA.
Kincannon, J., Gleber, C., & Kim, J. (1999). The effects of metacognitive training on performance and use of metacognitive skills in self-directed learning situations. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX.
Kirsch, I., De Jong, J., LaFontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., & Monseur, C. (2003). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries. Paris: OECD.
Lavy, V. (2011). What makes an effective teacher? Quasi-Experimental Evidence (NBER Working Paper 16885).
Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McCaffrey, J. R., Lockwood, D. F., Koretz, D. M., & Hamilton, L. S. (2003). Evaluating value added models for teacher accountability [Monograph]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2004/RAND_MG158.pdf
Mendro, R., Jordan, H., Gomez, E., Anderson, M., & Bembry, K. (1998). An application of multiple linear regression in determining longitudinal teacher effectiveness. Paper presented at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the AERA, San Diego, CA.
Najar, R. L. (1999, July 12–15). Pathways to success: Learning strategy instruction and content curriculum. Paper presented in HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne.
OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: The Author. Retrieved July 03, 2009, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/60/34002216.pdf
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do–student performance in reading, mathematics and science. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/10/61/48852548.pdf
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: Ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Vol. III). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Rivers, J. C. (1999). The impact of teacher effect on student math competency achievement (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2000). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement (Working Paper W6691). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. Retrieved February 19, 2009, from http://edpro.stanford.edu/Hanushek/admin/pages/files/uploads/teachers.econometrica.pdf
Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. (2002). What large-scale survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. The Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525–1567.
Sanders, W., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research Center.
Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 11(1), 57–67.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. New York, NY: Elsevier.
Schwerdt, G., & Wuppermann, A. C. (2011). Is traditional teaching really all that bad? A within-student between-subject approach. Economics of Education Review, 30(2), 365–379.
Shin, H., Jeon, W. T., & Yang, E. B. (2010). Relationship between learning strategies and academic achievement in medical college and graduate medical school students. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 22(3), 197–204.
Simsek, A., & Balaban, J. (2010). Learning strategies of successful and unsuccessful university students. Online Submission, 1(1), 36–45.
Teong, S. K. (2003). The effect of metacognitive training on mathematical word‐problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 46–55.
Vaidya, S. R. (1999). Metacognitive learning strategies for students with learning disabilities. Education, 120(1), 186–190.
Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249–294.
Weinstein, C., & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Wenglinsky, H. (2002). The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10, 12.
Wilkinson, L. P. (2015). Ovid recalled. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Yumusak, N., Sungur, S., & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Turkish high school students’ biology achievement in relation to academic self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(1), 53–69.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Razak, N.A., Shafaei, A. (2016). The Variation in Teaching and Learning Practices and their Contribution to Mathematics Performance in PISA 2012. In: Thien, L.M., Razak, N.A., Keeves, J.P., Darmawan, I.G.N. (eds) What Can PISA 2012 Data Tell Us?. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-468-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-468-8_8
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-468-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)