Skip to main content

A Performative Account of the Use of Oaths to Enhance Integrity Within the Military

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2019

Part of the book series: NL ARMS ((NLARMS))

  • 224 Accesses

Abstract

Taking oaths has been part of military protocol dating back to the Bronze Age. For example, the pledging of allegiance to the flag, or the reciting of the soldier’s creed, mark the connection and commitment of military personnel to the corps and its codes. Also, in the literature on business ethics, oaths have been recognized as a means of raising the level of integrity within organizations. The underlying idea is that the performing of such rituals makes a real difference to the individuals or organization keeping to their commitments. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the performative functioning of oaths as a means to entrench integrity within organizations and in its individual members could offer new insights into the steering of organizations towards integrity both theoretically and practically. To this purpose, this chapter takes a closer look at how oaths function in the education and training of military officers: on the one hand, officers taking oaths as part of their own training and induction, and as part of their future role as an officer administering oaths on the other hand. Conceptually the assessment draws on the speech-act theories of Austin 1975 and Searle 1989.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Civil Servant Statute of the Ministry of Defence (BARD) Article 70a, General Military Civil Servant Statute (AMAR), Article 126a.

  2. 2.

    Anderson and Escher 2010; Wankel and Stachowicz-Stanusch 2011; Weaver et al. 2016.

  3. 3.

    https://www.defensie.nl/onderwerpen/integriteit/defensie-en-integriteit, Accessed 7 January 2019.

  4. 4.

    Rieke and Guastello 1995; Zarim et al. 2016.

  5. 5.

    Audi and Murphy 2006.

  6. 6.

    Windsor in Monga and Orlitzky 2017.

  7. 7.

    Audi and Murphy 2006.

  8. 8.

    Ibid.; Windsor in Monga and Orlitzky 2017.

  9. 9.

    Dutch Ministry of Defence (2012) Aanwijzing SG A/984: Uitvoering van het integriteitsbeleid Defensie, p. 6.

  10. 10.

    van der Steenhoven and Aalbersberg 2016.

  11. 11.

    Kayes et al. 2007; Verhezen 2010.

  12. 12.

    Gonzalez-Padron et al. 2012.

  13. 13.

    Manz et al. 2008.

  14. 14.

    https://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/our-strategy/business-integrity/.

  15. 15.

    https://monsanto.com/company/commitments/our-pledge/.

  16. 16.

    Anderson and Escher 2010; Wankel and Stachowicz-Stanusch 2011; Weaver et al. 2016.

  17. 17.

    Oettinger 1976.

  18. 18.

    Siewert 1977.

  19. 19.

    Renatus 1996.

  20. 20.

    Landolt 1861.

  21. 21.

    Loonen and Rutgers 2017.

  22. 22.

    Bentham 1827.

  23. 23.

    Austin 1975.

  24. 24.

    Searle 1989.

  25. 25.

    Hall 1999.

  26. 26.

    Austin 1975.

  27. 27.

    Blok 2013; Blok 2017.

  28. 28.

    Dutch Ministry of Defence (2012) Aanwijzing SG A/984: Uitvoering van het integriteitsbeleid Defensie.

  29. 29.

    Civil Servant Statute of the Ministry of Defence (BARD) Article 70a, General Military Civil Servant Statute (AMAR), Article 126a.

  30. 30.

    Austin 1975.

  31. 31.

    Blok 2013.

  32. 32.

    Blok 2017.

  33. 33.

    Evans 1963.

  34. 34.

    Blok 2013.

  35. 35.

    Giebels et al. 2018, p. 15.

  36. 36.

    COID [Central Organization Integrity Defence] 2014.

References

  • Anderson M, Escher P (2010) The MBA oath: Setting a higher standard for business leaders. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi R, Murphy PE (2006) The many faces of integrity. Bus Ethics Q 16:3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin JL (1975) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham J (1827) Rationale of Judicial Evidence: Specially Applied to English Practice (in five volumes). Hunt and Clarke, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok V (2013) The Power of Speech Acts: Reflections on a Performative Concept of Ethical Oaths in Economics and Business. Rev Soc Econ 71:187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blok V (2017) Bridging the Gap between Individual and Corporate Responsible Behaviour: Toward a Performative Concept of Corporate Codes. Philos Manag 16:117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COID (2014) Integriteit bij de opleiding en vorming van adelborsten en cadetten aan de Nederlandse Defensie Academie. Duiding van risico’s, perspectief op verbetering [Integrity in the education and training of midshipmen and cadets at the Netherlands Defence Academy. Interpretation of risks, perpective on improvement]. http://www.gi-nederland.com/wp-content/uploads/Rapportage-Risicoanalyse-Integriteit.pdf. Accessed 1 January 2019.

  • Evans DD (1963) The logic of self-involvement. SCM, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giebels E, van Oostrum F, van den Bos K (2018) Onderzoek naar een sociaal veilige werkomgeving bij Defensie [Investigation into a socially safe work environment at Defence]. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2018/10/15/onderzoek-naar-een-sociaal-veilige-werkomgeving-bij-defensie. Accessed 23 May 2019.

  • Gonzalez-Padron TL, Ferrell OC, Ferrell L, Smith IA (2012) A Critique of Giving Voice to Values Approach to Business Ethics Education. J Acad Ethics 10:251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall K (1999) Performativity. J Linguist Anthropol 9:184–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayes DC, Stirling D, Nielsen TM (2007) Building organizational integrity. Bus Horiz 50:61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landolt HMF (1861) Militair woordenboek voor Nederlanders bewerkt [Military Dictionary edited for Dutchmen]. Sijthoff, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loonen T, Rutgers MR (2017) Swearing to be a good banker: Perceptions of the obligatory banker’s oath in the Netherlands. J Bank Regul 18:28–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz CC, Anand V, Joshi M, Manz KP (2008) Emerging paradoxes in executive leadership: A theoretical interpretation of the tensions between corruption and virtuous values. Leadersh Q 19:385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monga M, Orlitzky M (eds) (2017) Integrity in Business and Management: Cases and Theory. Taylor & Francis, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oettinger N (1976) Die militärischen Eide der Hethiter. Harrassowitz, Mainz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renatus FV (1996) Vegetius: epitome of military science. Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieke ML, Guastello SJ (1995) Unresolved issues in honesty and integrity testing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1989) How performatives work. Linguist Philos 12:535–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siewert P (1977) The ephebic oath in fifth-century Athens. J Hell Stud 97:102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Steenhoven K, Aalbersberg M (2016) Moral fitness. Een onderzoek naar de integriteit van de defensieorganisatie ten aanzien van de omgang met commerciële partijen op het gebied van IT [Moral fitness. An investigation into the integrity of the defence organization with regard to dealing with commercial parties in the area of IT].

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhezen P (2010) Giving Voice in a Culture of Silence. From a Culture of Compliance to a Culture of Integrity. J Bus Ethics 96:187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wankel C, Stachowicz-Stanusch A (2011) Management education for integrity: Ethically educating tomorrow’s business leaders. Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver M, Paxton S, Tan H, Crossan K (2016) Cultivating responsible business in Scotland through the lens of the Scottish business pledge. Scotland’s Responsible Business Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarim ZA, Zaki HO, Maridz NLM (2016) Motivation Factors: Impact on Sales Commission Plan Employees in a Telecommunication Company in Malaysia. Management 4:139–148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to express our special gratitude to the commander NLDA General-Major Geerts and his staff for making available the official documents of the preparation and conducting of the NLDA oath-taking ceremony which was used as an example throughout this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Job Timmermans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 T.M.C. Asser press and the authors

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Timmermans, J., Bertrand, R. (2019). A Performative Account of the Use of Oaths to Enhance Integrity Within the Military. In: Klinkert, W., Bollen, M., Jansen, M., de Jong, H., Kramer, EH., Vos, L. (eds) NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2019. NL ARMS. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-315-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-315-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-314-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-315-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics