Skip to main content

Abstract

Games are a new form of storytelling and social interaction for the younger generation. Furthermore, learning has always been about storytelling and social interaction; infants learn from their parents, children learn from their siblings and friends, and even formal education is based on narration. Furthermore, children are ready to do more work for their game characters than what they are willing to do for themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2006). Developmental dynamics between mathematical performance, task motivation, and teacher’s goals during the transition to primary school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 21-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, C., Chin, D., Oppezzo, M., & Schwartz, D. (2009). Teachable agents and the Protégé Effect: Increasing the effort towards learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 334-352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. Using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In CHI’11 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (CHI EA’11) (pp. 2425-2428). New York, NY: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huotari, K. & Hamari, J. (2012). Defining gamification: A service marketing perspective. In Proceedings of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference (MindTrek’12) (pp. 17-22). New York, NY: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kembel, G. (2010). The classroom in 2020. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/08/stanford-design-2020-technology-data-companies-10-education.html

  • Ketamo, H. (2009). Semantic networks-based teachable agents in an educational game. Transactions on Computers, 8(4), 641-650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketamo, H. (2011). Sharing behaviors in games and social media. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, 5(1), 224-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketamo, H., Nurmi, C., & Kallama, K. (2011). User generated AI in sports education. In Sh European Conference on Games-Based Learning (pp. 306-314). Athens, Greece, 20-21 October 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketamo, H., & Kiili, K. (2010). Conceptual change takes time: Game based learning cannot be only supplementary amusement. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(4), 399-419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketamo, H., & Suominen, M. (2010). Learning-by-teaching in an educational game: The educational outcome, user experience and social networks. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(1), 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiili, K. & Ketamo, H. (2007). Exploring the learning mechanism in educational games. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 15(4), 319-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe, J., Legault, F., & Batiste, S. J. (2005). Teacher interpersonal behavior and adolescents’ motivation in mathematics: A comparison of learning disabled, average, and talented students. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 39-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukin, T. (2013). Motivaatio matematiikan opiskelussa – Seurantatutkimus motivaatiotekijöistä ja niiden välisistä yhteyksistä yläkoulun aikana. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland. Dissertations in Education, Humanities, and Theology, no. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., & Scrivani, L. (2004). Enhancing students’ mathematical beliefs: An intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 14, 153-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDrurya, J., & Alterioa, M. (2001). Achieving reflective learning using storytelling pathways. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(1), 63-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting long-term growth in students’ mathematics achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 84(4), 1475-1490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, N., Moely, B. E., & Sachs, J. (2000). Motivational beliefs, study strategies, and mathematics attainment in high- and low-achieving Chinese secondary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 287–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryokai, K., Vaucelle, C., & Cassell, J. (2002). Literacy learning by storytelling with a virtual peer. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (CSCL’02) (pp. 352-360), January 7-11. Colorado, USA: The International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Välijärvi, J. (2013). PISA 2012 ensituloksia. Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos, Jyväskylän yliopisto. [OnLine: http://www.aka.fi/Tiedostot/Tiedostot/LAPSET/V%C3%A4lij%C3%A4rvi,%20SKIDI%20041213.pdf]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ketamo, H. (2014). Learning by Teaching. In: Niemi, H., Multisilta, J., Lipponen, L., Vivitsou, M. (eds) Finnish Innovations and Technologies in Schools. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-749-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics