Skip to main content

Identifying Knowledge, Skills and Abilities of Successful Entrepreneurs

  • Chapter
Becoming an Entrepreneur

Part of the book series: Professional and Vet Learning ((PAVL))

Abstract

There are a lot of significant functions for society and economy young enterprises are accountable for. Schumpeter (1950) named economic growth, innovation, and creative destruction. Therefore, the entrepreneur, the founder of a young enterprise, is an important object of entrepreneurship research (Rauch & Frese, 2007; Zhao & Seibert, 2006). Questions like whether there are specific skills, knowledge, attitudes, personality traits, or dispositions that distinguish entrepreneurs from other people or that support their success guided entrepreneurship research (Lang-von Wins, 2004; Walter & Walter, 2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtenhagen, F. (2012). The curriculum-instruction-assessment triad. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 4(1), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnir, A., & McLaughlin, E. (2011). Parental self-employment, start-up activities and funding: exploring intergenerational effects. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 16(3), 371–392. doi:10.1142/S1084946711001884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1993). Der ökonomische Ansatz zur Erklärung menschlichen Verhaltens (2nd ed., Vol. 32). Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H., & Wagner, M. (2010). Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurs in Germany: Characteristics and earnings differentials. Schmalenbachs Business Review, 62, 154–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braukmann, U., Bijedic, T., & Schade, C. (2008). Unternehmerische Persönlichkeit—eine theoretische Rekonstruktion und normaldefinitorische Konturierung. Wuppertal: Schumpeter School of Business and Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braukmann, U., Bijedic, T., & Schneider, D. (2008). Unternehmerische Persönlichkeit—eine theoretische Rekonstruktion und nominaldefinitorische Konturierung. Wuppertal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, J., Grichnik, D., & Kapsa, D. (2010). Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle?: A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning–performance relationship in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brixy, U., Hundt, C., & Sternberg, R. (2009). Global entrepreneurship monitor Länderbericht Deutschland 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruyat, C., & Julien, P.-A. (2001). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 165–180. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00043-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, W. D. (2010). The portable MBA in entrepreneurship (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Mayfield, M. S. (1999). O*NET’s theoretical contributions to job analysis research. In N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, W. C. Borman, P. R. Jeanneret, & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 297–304). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. M. (2006). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual-differences model and its applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Pr.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009). Vorfahrt für KMU in Europa: Der small business act für Europa. Brussels. Fiet, J. O. (2001). The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 1–24. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00041-5

  • Gavin, C. (2006). Entrepreneur opportunity costs and intended venture growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 610–632. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgellis, Y., Sessions, J. G., & Tsitsianis, N. (2005). Windfalls, wealth, and the transition to self-employment. Small Business Economics, 25(5), 407–428. doi:10.1007/s11187-004-6477-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, S., & Niefert, M. (2011). ZEW gründungsreport: Die entwicklung des regionalen gründungsgeschehens im high-tech-sektor. Retrieved Retrieved September 24, 2013, from ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/grep/Grep0111.pdf

  • Günterberg, B. (2011). Gründungen, liquidationen, insolvenzen 2010 in Deutschland. Retrieved September 24, 2013, from http://www.ifm-bonn.org/assets/documents/Daten-und-Fakten-1-2011.pdf

  • Halbfas, B. (2006). Entrepreneurship education an Hochschulen. Eine wirtschafts-pädagogische und -didaktische analyse. Paderborn: Eusl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices. A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 48–73. doi:10.1037/a0026223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D., Bosma, N., & Amorós, J. E. (2011). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2010 global report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandt, H., & Volkmann, C. (2006). Development and prospects of academic entrepreneurship education in Germany. Higher Education in Europe, 31(2), 195–208. doi:10.1080/03797720600940880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang-von W. T. (2004). Der unternehmer: Arbeits- und organisationspsychologische Grundlagen. Berlin [u.a.]: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang-von W. T., Leiner, R., Rosenstiehl, L., & Schmude, J. (2002). Aufgaben und ihre Bewältigung in der Vorgründungs-, Gründungs-, und Nachgründungsphase: Eine empirische Erfassung des Verlaufes von geförderten Unternehmensgründungen. In J. Schmude & R. Leiner (Eds.), Unternehmensgründungen. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zum Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 97–136). Heidelberg: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2010). Guidelines for conducting and reporting mixed research in the field of counseling and beyond. Journal of Counseling and Development, (88), 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., Moriano, J. A., & Zarnowska, A. (2008). Stimulating entrepreneurial intentions trough education. In J. A. Moriano, M. Gorgievski, & M. Lukes (Eds.), Teaching Psychology of Entrepreneurship (pp. 45–68). Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educatión a Distancia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machi, L. A., & Evoy, B. T. (2009). The literature review: Six steps to success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. van Nostrand: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, S., Volery, T., & von. Siemens, B. (2012). What do entrepreneurs actually do? An observational study of entrepreneurs’ everyday behavior in the start-up and growth stages. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 36(5), 995–1017. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00538.x

  • Müller, S. (2011). Increasing entrepreneurial intention: Effective entrepreneurship course characteristics. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 13(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for O*Net Development for USDOL. (2010). The O*Net content model: Detailed outline with descriptions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, P. R., & Fleishman, E. A. (Eds.). (1999). An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Jeanneret, P. R., Fleishman, E. A., Levin, K. Y., Morgeson, F. P., et al. (2001). Understanding work using the occupational information network (O*Net): Implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54, 451–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrova, K. (2012). Part-time entrepreneurship and financial constraints: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics, 39(2), 473–493. doi:10.1007/s11187-010-9310-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuber, A. R., & Fischer, E. M. (2011). International entrepreneurship in internet-enabled markets. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6), 660–679. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripsas, S. (1998). Elemente der Entrepreneurship-Education. In S. Ripsas & J. Zimmer (Eds.), Entrepreneurship (pp. 217–234). München: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, U., & Henning-Thurau, T. (2009). VHB-JOURQUAL2: Method, results, and implications of the German academic association for business research’s journal ranking. BuR—Business Research, (2), 180–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (3rd ed.). New York, NY/London, UK: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seth, S., & Sen, A. (1995). Behavioral characteristics of women enterpreneurs and executives vis-a-vis their male counterparts: An empirical study. Social Science International, 11(1–2), 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. H. Jr., & Roth, P. L. (2004). Data quality affects meta-analytic conclusions: A response to Miner and Raju (2004) concerning entrepreneurial risk propensity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 14–21. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uebelacker, S. (2005). Gründungsausbildung: Entrepreneurship education an deutschen Hochschulen und ihre raumrelevanten Strukturen, Inhalte und Effekte. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S. G., & Walter, A. (2009). Personenbezogene determinanten von unternehmens-gründungen: Stand der forschung und perspektiven des fortschritts. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, (1), 57–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S., & Funke, S. (2012). An instructional perspectve on entrepreneurship education. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 4(1), 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, F. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–65). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterton, J. (2009). Competence across Europe: Highest common factor or lowest common denominator? Journal of Europeann Industrial Training, 33(8/9), 681–700. doi:10.1108/03090590910993571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winther, E. (2010). Kompetenzmessung in der beruflichen Bildung. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hofmuth, M. (2014). Identifying Knowledge, Skills and Abilities of Successful Entrepreneurs. In: Weber, S., Oser, F.K., Achtenhagen, F., Fretschner, M., Trost, S. (eds) Becoming an Entrepreneur. Professional and Vet Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-596-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics