Skip to main content

Reasoning about Fairness in Access to Higher Education

Common Sense, Normative, and Institutional Perspectives

  • Chapter
Fairness in Access to Higher Education in a Global Perspective

Abstract

Recently, China has introduced significant fees for college entrance, which has some of the country’s Communists worried. They wonder whether China is going the American way. The following is a stylized version of a conversation the author had with a Chinese social scientist who was also a member of the Chinese communist party.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atwell, R.H. (2001). Standardized tests and access to American universities. The 2001 R.H. Atwell distinguished Lecture at 83d Annual Meeting of the American Council on Education. 2001. Retrieved from http://www.ucop.edu/news/sat/speech1.html

  • Barrionuevo, A. (2011, August 8). With kiss-ins and dances, young Chileans push for reform. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baber, L.D., & Lindsay, B. (2006). Analytical reflection on access in English higher education: Transnational lessons across the pond. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1(2), 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (2007). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Sandel, M.J. (Ed.). Justice: A reader. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., & Naidoo, R. (2008). Higher education and the achievement (and/or prevention) of equity and social justice. Higher Education, 56(3), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cauchon, D. (2011, October 18). Student loans outstanding will exceed 1 trillion this year. USA Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. (1999). Management challenges for the 21st century. Massachusetts: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1992). Local justice: How institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.F., & Friedman, R.D. (1980). Free to choose: a personal statement. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, M.A. (1993). Rights talk: The impoverishment of political discourse. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. (2006). The competition for high-ability students: Universities in a key marketplace. In S. Brint (Ed.). The Future of the City of Intellect. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, D. (2006). The price of admission: How America’s ruling class buys its way into elite colleges … and who gets left outside the gates. New York: Crown Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, C.H. (1965). The rise of universities. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1960/1984). Equality, value, and merit. In M. Sandel (Ed.). Liberalism and its critics. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyneman, S.P. (2004). Education and corruption. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 637–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L.A. (2003). Pursuing equal opportunities: the theory and practice of egalitarian justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, D.B. (2006). Financing higher education: Cost-sharing in international perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. In M.J. Sandel (Ed.). Justice: A reader. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, T. (2011, September 21). Universities seeking out students of means. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.C. (1984). After virtue (Vol. 211). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcucci, P.N., & Johnstone, D.B. (2007). Tuition fee policies in a comparative perspective: Theoretical and political rationales. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., (1938). The Critique of the Gotha Programme. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H.D. (2010). Local control as a mechanism of colonization of public education in the United States. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(8), 830–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H.D., & Boyd, W.L. (2001) Education between States, Markets, and Civil Society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1998). Utilitarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (2009). Autobiography. Miami: Seven Treasures Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. (1998). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A.M. (1975). Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff. Washington DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareene, A. (2011, October 20). Student loan debts crush an entire generation. USA Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premfors, R. (1982).Values and value tradeoffs in higher education policy. Policy Sciences, 14(4), 365–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971/1999). A theory of justice. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1958). Justice as fairness. The Philosophical Review, 164–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M.J. (Ed.) (1987). Liberalism and its critics. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M.J. (2010). Justice: What’s the right thing to do?. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M.J. (Ed.) (2007). Justice: A reader. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schom, A. (1997). Napoleon Bonaparte. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Sen, A., & Hanley, R.P. (2010). The theory of moral sentiments. London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (2010). Twentieth century higher education: Elite to mass to universal. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1984). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, G., & Zimmerman, D. (2004). Peer effects in higher education. In College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 395–424). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meyer, HD. (2013). Reasoning about Fairness in Access to Higher Education. In: Meyer, HD., John, E.P.S., Chankseliani, M., Uribe, L. (eds) Fairness in Access to Higher Education in a Global Perspective. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-230-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships