Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Pollutant Exchange at Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere Interfaces and Atmospheric Fate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agriculture and Air Quality

Abstract

The presence in the atmosphere of pollutants emitted from agriculture or impacting crop production, their concentration levels and their residence time depend on a series of physical, chemical and biological processes. This chapter describes the basic mechanisms and the main factors involved in air pollutant emissions and fate in agricultural systems. These include emissions to the atmosphere from fields or livestock husbandry, atmospheric transfers at various scales – from the proximity of the sources to regional and global scales –, atmospheric chemistry and deposition to ecosystem. These concepts are necessary to understand the context and various choices that can be made in terms of measuring air concentrations and emission/deposition fluxes and of modelling emissions, atmospheric fate – dispersion, transport, degradation – and deposition. The knowledge on these processes contributes to modelling the impact of agricultural sources on air quality and the impact of air pollution on ecosystems. It also helps identify levers for mitigating emissions from agriculture and impacts of air pollution on crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:22866:ed-1:v1:en

References

  • Abis L, Loubet B, Ciuraru R et al (2018) Profiles of volatile organic compound emissions from soils amended with organic waste products. Sci Total Environ 636:1333–1343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson R, Arey J (2003) Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds. Chem Rev 103:4605–4638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aylor DE (2017) Aerial Dispersal of Pollen and Spores, 1st edn. American Phytopathological Society, St Paul

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, Cutler D et al (1998) Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Bot J Linn Soc 126:237–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit P, Alletto L, Barriuso E et al (2014) Travail du sol et risques de transfert de produits phytosanitaires. In: Labreuche J, Laurent F, Roger-Estrade J (eds) Faut-il travailler le sol ? Acquis et innovations pour une agriculture durable. Éditions Quæ, Versailles, pp 127–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiffin J, Laurent F, Richard G (2020) Réussir l'implantation des cultures. Enjeux agro-écologiques, itinéraires techniques. Éditions Quæ, Versailles, 440 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrás E, Ródenas M, Vera T et al (2015) Use of high-volume outdoor smog chamber photo-reactors for studying physical and chemical atmospheric aerosol formation and composition. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 28:012004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouvier F, Rahier A, Camara B (2005) Biogenesis molecular regulation and function of plant isoprenoids. Prog Lipid Res 44:357–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brinton WF (1998) Volatile organic acids in compost: production and odorant aspects. Compost Sci Util 6:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromilow RH, Chamberlain K (1991) Pathways and mechanisms of transport of herbicides in plants. In: Kirkwood RC (ed) Target sites for herbicide action. Springer, Boston, pp 245–284

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burns SP, Sun J, Lenschow DH et al (2011) Atmospheric stability effects on wind fields and scalar mixing within and just above a subalpine forest in sloping terrain. Bound-Layer Meteorol 138:231–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvet R (2013) Le sol, vol 678. Éditions France agricole, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvet R, Barriuso E, Bedos C et al (2005) Les pesticides dans le sol. In: Conséquences agronomiques et environnementales. Éditions France agricole, Paris, p 637

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceschia E, Mary B, Ferlicoq M et al (2017) Potentiel d’atténuation des changements climatiques par les couverts intermédiaires. Innovations agronomiques 62:43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon-Madrid HJ, Donahue NM (2011) Fragmentation vs. functionalization: chemical aging and organic aerosol formation. Atmos Chem Phys 11:10553–10563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Parcevaux S, Huber L (2007) Bioclimatologie: concepts et applications. Éditions Quæ, Versailles

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas R, Mégie G, Peuch V-H (eds) (2005) Physique et chimie de l’atmosphère. Échelles, Paris/Belin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont S, Brunet Y, Jarosz N (2006) Eulerian modelling of pollen dispersal over heterogeneous vegetation canopies. Agric Forest Meteorol 141:82–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enami S, Hoffmann MR, Colussi AJ (2008) Acidity enhances the formation of a persistent ozonide at aqueous ascorbate/ozone gas interfaces. PNAS 105:7365–7369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Faburé J, Rogier S, Loubet B et al (2011) Synthèse bibliographique sur la contribution de l’agriculture à l’émission de particules vers l’atmosphère: identification de facteurs d’émission. Rapport final projet de recherche Inra-Ademe, 164 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Feilberg A, Bildsoe P, Nyord T (2015) Application of PTR-MS for measuring odorant emissions from soil application of manure slurry. Sensors 15:1148–1167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson-Pitts BJ, Pitts JN (1997) Tropospheric air pollution: ozone airborne toxics polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and particles. Science 276:1045–1052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flechard CR, Fowler D, Sutton MA et al (1999) A dynamic chemical model of bi-directional ammonia exchange between semi-natural vegetation and the atmosphere. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 125:2611–2641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss K-U (2004) The air/surface adsortion equilibrium of organic compounds under ambient conditions. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 34(4):339–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grøntoft T (2004) Measurements and modelling of the ozone deposition velocity to concrete tiles including the effect of diffusion. Atmos Environ 38:49–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guyot G (1998) Physics of the environment and climate. Wiley, Chicester, 632 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeussermann A, Costa A, Aerts J-M et al (2008) Development of a dynamic model to predict PM10 emissions from swine houses. J Environ Qual 37:557–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallquist M, Wenger JC, Baltensperger U et al (2009) The formation properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues. Atmos Chem Phys 9:5155–5236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamaker JW, Thompson JM (1972) Adsorption. In: Goring CAI, Hamaker JW (eds) Organic chemicals in the soil environment. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haupt SE, Beyer-Lout A, Long KJ et al (2009) Assimilating concentration observations for transport and dispersion modeling in a meandering wind field. Atmos Environ 43:1329–1338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heller R (2004) Physiologie végétale. Tome 1. Nutrition, 6e éd. Dunod, Paris, 320 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Houot S, Pons M-N, Pradel M et al (2014) Valorisation des matières fertilisantes d’origine résiduaire sur les sols à usage agricole ou forestier. Impacts agronomiques environnementaux socio-économiques. Expertise scientifique collective Inra-CNRS-Irstea, 100 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber L, Madden LV, Fitt BDL (2006) Environmental biophysics applied to the dispersal of fungal spores by rain-splash. In: Cooke BM, Gareth DG, Kaye B (eds) The epidemiology of plant diseases. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 348–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted S, Schjoerring JK (1996) Ammonia flux between oilseed rape plants and the atmosphere in response to changes in leaf temperature light intensity and air humidity (interactions with leaf conductance and apoplastic NH4+ and H+ concentrations). Plant Physiol 112:67–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Iinuma Y, Böge O, Kahnt A et al (2009) Laboratory chamber studies on the formation of organosulfates from reactive uptake of monoterpene oxides. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:7985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez JL, Canagaratna MR, Donahue NM et al (2009) Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere. Science 326:1525–1529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HG (2013) Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joy KW (1988) Ammonia glutamine and asparagine: a carbon-nitrogen interface. Can J Bot 66:2103–2109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keppler F, Hamilton JTG, Braß M et al (2006) Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. Nature 439:187–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MAH, Percival CJ, Caravan RL et al (2018) Criegee intermediates and their impacts on the troposphere. Environ Sci Process Impacts 20:437–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch K, Bhushan B, Barthlott W (2008) Diversity of structure morphology and wetting of plant surfaces. Soft Matter 4:1943–1963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll JH, Seinfeld JH (2008) Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol: formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere. Atmos Environ 42:3593–3624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kürten A, Li C, Bianchi F et al (2018) New particle formation in the sulfuric acid-dimethylamine-water system: reevaluation of CLOUD chamber measurements and comparison to an aerosol nucleation and growth model. Atmos Chem Phys 18:845–863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamaud E, Loubet B, Irvine M et al (2009) Partitioning of ozone deposition over a developed maize crop between stomatal and non-stomatal uptakes using eddy-covariance flux measurements and modelling. Agric For Meteorol 149:1385–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leegood RC, Lea PJ, Adcock MD et al (1995) The regulation and control of photorespiration. J Exp Bot 46:1397–1414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leistra M (2005) Estimating input data for computations on the volatilisation of pesticides from plant canopies and competing processes. Alterra-rapport, Wageningen, 79 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichiheb N, Bedos C, Personne E et al (2015) Measuring leaf penetration and volatilization of chlorothalonil and epoxiconazole applied on wheat leaves in a laboratory-scale experiment. J Environ Qual 44:1782–1790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lichiheb N, Personne E, Bedos C et al (2016) Implementation of the effects of physicochemical properties on the foliar penetration of pesticides and its potential for estimating pesticide volatilization from plants. Sci Total Environ 550:1022–1031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luhar AK, Hurley PJ (2012) Application of a coupled prognostic model to turbulence and dispersion in light-wind stable conditions with an analytical correction to vertically resolve concentrations near the surface. Atmos Environ 51:56–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maffei ME (2010) Sites of synthesis biochemistry and functional role of plant volatiles. S A J Bot Chem Div Biol Funct Plant Volat 76:612–631

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massad RS, Loubet B, Tuzet A et al (2008) Relationship between ammonia stomatal compensation point and nitrogen metabolism in arable crops: current status of knowledge and potential modelling approaches. Environ Pollut 154:390–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massad R-S, Nemitz E, Sutton MA (2010) Review and parameterisation of bi-directional ammonia exchange between vegetation and the atmosphere. Atmos Chem Phys 10:10359–10386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mellouki A, Collin P, Lafargue P-E (2007) Pesticides dans l’atmosphère: études des cinétiques et mécanismes de dégradation en laboratoire et mesures dans l’atmosphère. Rapport final, programme Pesticides (APR 2002), 118 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills G, Wagg S, Harmens H (2013) Ozone pollution: impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity. ICP Vegetation Coordination Center, CEH, Bangor

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SM, Sorooshian A, Kroll JH et al (2007) Secondary aerosol formation from atmospheric reactions of aliphatic amines. Atmos Chem Phys 7:2313–2337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan R, Katul GG, Horn HS et al (2002) Mechanisms of long-distance dispersal of seeds by wind. Nature 418:409–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ng NL, Kroll JH, Keywood MD et al (2006) Contribution of first- versus second-generation products to secondary organic aerosols formed in the oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Technol 40:2283–2297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet RER, Fisher R, Nimmo RH et al (2009) Emission of methane from plants. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:1347–1354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson SE, Chung MY, Hasson AS (1999) OH Radical formation from the gas-phase reaction of ozone with terminal alkenes and the relationship between structure and mechanism. J Phys Chem A 103:8125–8138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Personne E, Loubet B, Herrmann B et al (2009) SURFATM-NH3: a model combining the surface energy balance and bi-directional exchanges of ammonia applied at the field scale. Biogeosciences 6:1371–1388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Personne E, Tardy F, Génermont S et al (2015) Investigating sources and sinks for ammonia exchanges between the atmosphere and a wheat canopy following slurry application with trailing hose. Agric For Meteorol 207:11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger M, Monod A, Wortham H (2009) Kinetic study of heterogeneous ozonolysis of alachlor trifluralin and terbuthylazine adsorbed on silica particles under atmospheric conditions. Atmos Environ 43:5597–5603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pillar-Little EA, Guzman MI (2018) An overview of dynamic heterogeneous oxidations in the troposphere. Environment 5(9):104

    Google Scholar 

  • Potard K, Monard C, Le Garrec J-L et al (2017) Organic amendment practices as possible drivers of biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds emitted by soils in agrosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 250:25–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potier E, Loubet B, Durand B et al (2017) Chemical reaction rates of ozone in water infusions of wheat beech oak and pine leaves of different ages. Atmos Environ 151:176–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt KA, Prather KA (2009) Real-time single-particle volatility size and chemical composition measurements of aged urban aerosols. Environ Sci Technol 43:8276–8282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pye K (1987) Aeolian Dust and Dust Deposits. Academic, London/Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard C, Ter Halle A, de Sainte-Claire P et al (2015) La photolyse des pesticides sur les feuilles. Comprendre les réactions afin d’améliorer l’efficacité des traitements phytosanitaires. L’actualité chimique:75–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard G, Stengel P, Lemaire G et al (2019) Une agronomie pour le xxie siècle. Éditions Quæ, Versailles, 304 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Concepción M, Boronat A (2015) Breaking new ground in the regulation of the early steps of plant isoprenoid biosynthesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 25:17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sander R (2015) Compilation of Henry’s law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent. Atmos Chem Phys 15:4399–4981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman SS, Bennett JL, Raymer JH (2001) Quantification of odors and odorants from swine operations in North Carolina. Agric For Meteorol 108:213–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schjoerring JK (1997) Plant-atmosphere ammonia exchange: quantification physiological regulation and interactions with environmental factors [Deschampsia flexuosa 20 affiliated papers], KVL

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenbach R, Gschwend PM, Imboden DM (1993) Environmental organic chemistry, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (2016) Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva PJ, Erupe ME, Price D et al (2008) Trimethylamine as precursor to secondary organic aerosol formation via nitrate radical reaction in the atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol 42:4689–4696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sintermann J, Schallhart S, Kajos M et al (2014) Trimethylamine emissions in animal husbandry. Biogeosciences 11:5073–5085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Socorro J (2015) Étude de la réactivité hétérogène de pesticides adsorbés sur des particules modèles atmosphériques: cinétiques et produits de dégradation. Thèse de l’université Aix-Marseille, École doctorale Science de l’environnement, 254 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Socorro J, Durand A, Temime-Roussel B et al (2016) The persistence of pesticides in atmospheric particulate phase: an emerging air quality issue. Sci Rep 6:33456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stella P, Loubet B, Lamaud E et al (2011a) Ozone deposition onto bare soil: a new parameterisation. Agric For Meteorol 151(6):669–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stella P, Personne E, Loubet B et al (2011b) Predicting and partitioning ozone fluxes to maize crops from sowing to harvest: the Surfatm-O-3 model. Biogeosciences 8:2869–2886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stella P, Loubet B, de Berranger C et al (2019) Soil ozone deposition: dependence of soil resistance to soil texture. Atmos Environ 199:202–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Surratt JD, Kroll JH, Kleindienst TE et al (2007) Evidence for organosulfates in secondary organic aerosol. Environ Sci Technol 41:517–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thangarajan R, Bolan NS, Tian G et al (2013) Role of organic amendment application on greenhouse gas emission from soil. Sci Total Environ 465:72–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Triplet JP, Roche G (1996) Météorologie générale. Météo-France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuzet A, Sanz C, Zurfluh O et al (1995) Les échanges convectifs au sein du couvert. In: Cruiziat P, Lagouarde P (eds) De la plante au couvert végétal. École-Chercheurs Inra en bioclimatologie, Inra, Département de Bioclimatologie, Le Croisic, pp 425–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuzet A, Perrier A, Loubet B et al (2011) Modelling ozone deposition fluxes: the relative roles of deposition and detoxification processes. Agric For Meteorol 151:480–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hove LWA, Adema EH, Vredenberg WJ et al (1989) A study of the adsorption of NH3 and SO2 on leaf surfaces. Atmos Environ 23:1479–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sébastien Saint-Jean .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Fundamental Aspects of Microclimate at Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere Interfaces, Soil Conditions and Crop Physiology

For further reading, see Guyot (1998), de Parcevaux and Huber (2007), Calvet et al. (2005), Calvet (2013), Heller (2004) or Jones (2013).

1.1.1 Energy Balance

Emission, transport and deposition processes are highly dependent on energy transfers occurring at the soil-vegetation-atmosphere interfaces. Understanding energy transfer processes enables characterization of the carrier fluid (in this case, air) and state variables of the exchange interfaces (surface temperature, humidity, presence of superficial water), which can also be modified by the presence of pollutants (such as hygroscopic compounds, i.e. having an affinity with water). The energy transfers at the interfaces are expressed as energy flux through the interface (W·m−2). When the energy flux is positive, the interface receives energy, which generally results in an increase in temperature (de Parcevaux and Huber 2007; Guyot 1998). Conversely, when the energy flux is negative, the interface losses energy and its temperature drops. Energy exchanges are radiative (net radiation, Rn), convective (sensible heat flux, H), conductive (heat flux, G) and phase change (latent heat flux, λE), each term being expressed in W·m−2. The energy balance at the interface is expressed as:

$$ {R}_n+H+\lambda E+G=\varDelta E $$
(10)

where ΔE is the energy stock at the interface, often considered as null for plants and soils. The terms of the energy balance (detailed below) depend on the overall hydric and thermal states of the soil profile, the regulation processes (evapotranspiration) and the physical properties of the vegetation cover (height, leaf profile, albedo, roughness). Thus, there is constant feedback between the energy transfer and the water status of this surface. The radiative energy fluxes are sorted according to their wavelength. Short-wavelength radiation (< 1 μm) consists of direct and diffuse solar radiation in its positive components (energy input), and a proportion of the reflected solar radiation (energy loss) at the interface. The reflection coefficient of short-wave radiation is called albedo (a). In addition to short-wave radiation, there is also long-wave radiation (above 1 μm) mainly in the infrared spectrum. These different types of radiations are classed by their positive component, atmospheric radiation Ra (responsible for the greenhouse effect), and their negative component, surface radiation of the interface, which is expressed as a function of its temperature. The sum of all these radiative fluxes is called net radiation, Rn. The sensitive heat flux (H) reflects the energy exchanges that modify the interface temperature controlled by the temperature gradient. The latent heat flux λE reflects the energy exchanges that result from changes in the state of water and is driven by the gradient in water vapour concentration between the surface and the atmosphere. Finally, the heat conduction energy flux (G) reflects the heat exchange by contact and is expressed according to Fourier’s law, describing the temperature gradient in the ground. These energy fluxes cause a change in the microclimate (atmospheric water content, temperature change) near the surface.

1.1.2 Water and Energy Transfers in the Soil

The soil moisture status is characterized by its water potential (hw, m−1); its water content (θ), which can be expressed as weight (kg water/kg soil) or volume (m3 water/m3 soil); or as a proportion of the volume of pores filled by water, depending on the approach and application. It evolves in time and space due to water transfer processes (described by Darcy’s law in water-saturated environments and generalized Darcy’s law or the Richards equation in water-unsaturated environments) in the soil profile as well as exchanges at the surface via the surface energy balance (described above). Similarly, the soil temperature evolves according to heat transfer processes (including conduction transfers, described by Fourier’s law). Since these statuses depend on the depth in the soil, it may be necessary to define layers, or soil horizons, by depth.

Depending on the weather forcing and water saturation of the soil, different hydraulic regimes exist: infiltration, hydrostatic equilibrium or capillary rise. This variability in water transfers is the largest in the thin surface layer of the soil, where the water content changes rapidly. It also implies that the ground surface can be subject to extreme local conditions, without intense meteorological forcing. In addition to local soil and climate conditions, the soil characteristics in terms of texture (sand/silt/clay distribution), density ρb (kg·m−3) or organic matter (OM) content must be known in order to calculate the soil transfer functions required to calculate the hw relationships (θ) and the hydraulic conductivity Kw (m·s−1). During a rainy season, depending on the soil, slope, and the presence of crops that can intercept varying degrees of rain, surface runoff can occur and generate horizontal transfers. While water transfers determine the ability of the soil to transport the different solutes in the soil, the water status and temperature of the soil also determine the distribution of compounds between the different phases (gases dissolved in soil water or adsorbed), which in turn determine the availability of the compound for the different transfers (in aqueous or gaseous form) and their degradation.

Finally, it is important to note the high spatial heterogeneity in soil conditions, which may lead to heterogeneity in the soil structure, which can increase preferential transport and lead to rapid transfers of solutes into the deeper soil (e.g. root passage, earthworms, fissures).

1.1.3 Soil Biophysical and Chemical Conditions

Soil condition is characterized by its water status, chemical status and biological status. The pH of the soil solution is one of its important characteristics for physicochemical balances and microbial functioning, as well as its cation exchange capacity (CEC). Soil organic matter is an essential component, as it conditions the chemical fertility of the soil, its structural stability and its microbial functioning. It can also influence water flows by modifying water adsorption processes. This organic matter consists of both inert and living organic matter (root, microbial biomass, mesofauna), which impacts the physical and chemical state of the soil and the biogeochemical transformations that take place there. Many processes and interactions take place in soil, and its state varies considerably, both spatially and temporally (with highly variable scales of space and time). For further reading, see Calvet (2013).

1.1.4 Biological Functioning of Plants and Vegetation Cover

The presence of vegetation cover modifies ambient conditions at the ground-atmosphere interface by creating a microclimate specific to the vegetation cover. A quick review of the general functioning of plants, whether cultivated or part of a natural ecosystem, will be helpful here. Plants are autotrophic organisms. They produce their own organic matter from mineral salts extracted from the soil and carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, which is assimilated by the leaves by using solar energy through the photosynthesis mechanism. Plants need different elements to survive and grow. The first is light, which is necessary for the photosynthesis process, which then provides energy, water and soil from which nutrients are derived; the second is air, from which CO2 is extracted. Although plants have different morphologies, they all have various organs: a stem bearing leaves and buds, and roots. These different organs are made up of tissues, organized in sets of specialized cells. The roots and the aerial part are two interdependent systems due to the conductive tissues that run through them. The xylem ensures the transport of raw sap (water and mineral salts), the phloem carries the elaborated sap (i.e. the organic and soluble compounds) from the leaves, where photosynthesis takes place, to the storage organs (tubers, roots, etc.) and fruits or grains.

The plant cells that make up these different organs are delimited by the plasma membrane and contain within them the vacuole (used to store water, nutrients and waste), the nucleus, and all intracellular organelles (namely the chloroplasts involved in the photosynthesis process). All of these elements are surrounded by a medium called cytoplasm. Plant cells are connected to each other through plasmodesms, channels that pass through the cell walls of plants to form the pathways for water, solutes, phythormones and phytopathogenic viruses that spread through the plant. The cytoplasm of these connected cells forms one single compartment in the plant, and the intracellular continuum thus obtained constitutes the symplasm. Outside the plant cells, the extracellular continuum formed by all the interstices of cell walls and dead xylem cells constitutes the apoplast. Water and solutes can use this route to infiltrate organs without entering a cell.

Roots allow the plant to be firmly and durably secured in the ground, but their main role is to draw up water and mineral salts that are essential for plant growth. This absorption is achieved through a multitude of absorbent hairs at the root tips, ensuring a very large contact surface at the root-soil interface. Water enters the roots through a hydrostatic mechanism.

The leaves are the main organs at the plant-air interface, with exchanges taking place according to two pathways: the cuticle and the stomata. The leaf generally consists of a petiole and a limb with veins (the conductive vessels) of very different shapes. A protective layer, called the epidermis, covers the plant’s aerial organs. The outermost part of the epidermis that is in contact with the air is the cuticle. The cuticle’s main physiological roles are related to its generally hydrophobic nature: it maintains a water-poor area on the plant surface, which protects the plant from pathogens (including germination and fungal spore development), and limits the loss of water, ions and polar solutions (sugars, organic acids, etc.) from the plant. The plant cuticle is covered by epicuticular waxes (Barthlott et al. 1998). These structures, composed of small, highly variable crystals associated with the presence of trichomes, confer roughness to the cuticle and play an important role in the wettability of leaf surfaces (Koch et al. 2008), while increasing surfaces that are potentially reactive to pollutants. Most of the leaves are green, i.e. with chlorophyll pigments. Chlorophyll is essential for photosynthesis. This biochemical mechanism allows the production of the organic compounds that make up the plant and are essential for its metabolism. It requires not only light, water and mineral salts coming through the xylem from the roots to the leaves, but also a carbon source, CO2, which the leaf draws from the atmospheric air. CO2, water vapour, and gaseous pollutants penetrate into the leaves through the microscopic pores of the leaves called stomata, then integrate the cells of the leaf tissues. Stomata open and close according to microclimatic conditions and plant regulation.

Plants play an important role in the surface energy balance. They are mainly made up of water, which constitutes from 80% to 95% of their total weight. They draw this water from the soil through their roots. Foliar transpiration causes sap to rise from the roots along the stems and to the leaves via the xylem using the energy provided by solar radiation. This suction phenomenon is very powerful: coupled with cohesion forces that hold the water column, it brings the water to the top of even the tallest trees. Transpiration is also a key element in regulating plant temperature. The transformation of liquid water to water vapour consumes huge amounts of energy (latent heat of vaporization) at constant temperature, which prevents the plant’s temperature from rising excessively under high solar radiation. The transpired water passes through the stomata, and in the case of water stress, the stomata close, limiting water loss for the plant. Transpiration is a specific and essential manifestation of plant behaviour towards water. Its intensity is such that the quantities of water stored in a plant and those used by its metabolism are very small compared to those that pass through the plant. Evapotranspiration almost exclusively regulates a plant’s water needs.

Plants growing in stands create what is called a plant canopy. Leaves are the main surfaces of exchange with the atmosphere. Their organization in space partly determines the effects of climatic factors: the penetration of wind and radiation into the different strata of the vegetation cover depends on the cumulated leaf surfaces from the top of the cover to the stratum in question. The total cumulative leaf area corresponds to the leaf area index (LAI, in m2 of leaves per m2 of soil). Similarly, fine roots and their absorbent hairs are the main surfaces of exchange with the soil and a total root area index (RAI, in m2 of root surfaces per m2 of soil) is defined.

Crop establishment for cultivated species usually begins with seeding. The different physiological stages of canopy growth and development to harvest include foliar development, flowering, fruiting and maturation. However, not all plant organs remain functional throughout the crop cycle: over time, ageing causes slow and progressive degradation of their functions and triggers a physiological process called senescence.

1.1.5 Effect of Agricultural Practices

In the context of agricultural fields, the implemented practices modify the state of the soil in ways that may be short or long term. For example, irrigation changes water levels and soil temperature in the short term, but it can also change albedo or surface roughness. Tillage (ploughing, stubble incorporation, seedbed preparation) causes a mixture of the different layers of soil impacted, thus drastically and instantly modifying its porosity, humidity and temperature. By incorporating any crop residues on the surface into the soil, it changes the local organic matter content and microbial activity in the soil (Boiffin et al. 2020). The energy and water balances of the surfaces may also be altered. Indeed, the energy absorbed by the surface is closely linked to the surface radiative properties (albedo, emissivity): thus, an increase in albedo (e.g. through crop establishment or crop residues) reduces the energy available at the surface and therefore the amount of heat entering the ground. The impact is generally negative on temperature, but this may depend on changes in water characteristics associated with this modification. In addition, these changes in surface properties result in a change in latent (λE) and sensitive (H) heat fluxes and consequently in the temperature of the surface and the surrounding air. In the absence of tillage, crop residues left on the soil lead to two opposite mechanisms: albedo increases while soil evaporation decreases (Ceschia et al. 2017), and surface horizons are generally acidified in relation to the accumulation of organic matter (Benoit et al. 2014). Inputs can also change the state of the environment: manure input, for example, provides a significant volume of water, alters the soil water content, temperature and surface conditions (e.g. albedo) due to the dry matter remaining on the surface. Other examples include the choice of crops, their density and the planting date, which profoundly modify the surface characteristics and temporal dynamics, as well as the energy and water transfer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saint-Jean, S. et al. (2020). Mechanisms of Pollutant Exchange at Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere Interfaces and Atmospheric Fate. In: Bedos, C., Génermont, S., Castell, JF., Cellier, P. (eds) Agriculture and Air Quality. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2058-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics