Abstract
Medieval discussions of universals are some of the most sophisticated and sustained discussions in the history of this topic. This article focuses on medieval discussions of the ontological status of universals. Speculations about the existence of universal things were prompted by what was said (and what was not said) in ancient Greek treatises on logic and metaphysics. Throughout the medieval period, philosophers divided roughly into those who believed that there was some mind-independent reality that was common to many particulars (i.e., realism) and those who believed that universality was a mind-dependent property (i.e., anti-realism or nominalism). Anti-realists critiqued contemporary versions of realism. Realists responded to the anti-realists with ever more sophisticated accounts of the real basis for predication and classification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Abelard, P. (1919). Logica ‘ingredientibus’, pt. 1: Glossae super Porphyrium. In B. Geyer (Ed.), Peter Abaelards Philosophische Schriften. I. Die Logica ‘Ingredientibus’. 1: die Glossen zu Porphyrius (Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters 21, Pt. 1, pp. 1–109). Münster: Aschendorffshen Buchhandlung.
Abelard, P. (1933). Logica ‘nostrorum petitioni sociorum’: glossula super Porphyrium. In: B. Geyer (Ed.), Peter Abaelards Philosophische Schriften. II. Die Logica ‘nostrorum petitioni sociorum’: die Glossen zu Porphyrius (Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters 21, Pt. 4, pp. 505–580). Münster: Aschendorffshen Buchhandlung.
Anonymous [Pseudo-Joscelin]. (2014). De generibus et speciebus. In P. King (Ed.), Pseudo-Joscelin: The treatise on genera and species. Oxford studies in medieval philosophy, Vol. 2, pp. 104–211.
Aquinas, T. (1976). De ente et essentia. In Opera omnia. Iussa Leonis XIII P. M. (Vol. 43). Rome: Editori di San Tommaso.
Boethius. (1906). In Isagogen Porphyrii commentorum. In S. Brandt (Ed.), Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum Latinorum (Vol. 48). Vienna: F. Tempsky.
Burley, W. (1999). Tractatus de universalibus. In H.-U. Wöhler (Ed.), Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig – Philologisch-historische Klasse bd. 75, 5. Leipzig/Stuttgart: Verlag der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig/S. Hirzel.
Duns Scotus John. (1973). Ordinatio, II, distinctio 3, pars 1. In Opera omnia (Vol. 7). Vatican City: Vatican Polyglot Press.
Ibn Sīnā [Avicenna]. (2005). The metaphysics of “The Healing” (ed & trans: Marmura, M. E.). Provo: Brigham Young University Press.
Porphyry. (1887). Isagoge. In A. Busse (Ed.), Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca (Vol. 4, Part 1). Berlin: George Reimer.
Spade, P. V. (trans.) (1994). Five texts on the mediaeval problem of universals. Indianapolis: Hackett.
William of Ockham. (1970). Scriptum in librum primum Sententiarum Ordinatio, distinctiones II–III. In S. Brown & G. Gál (Eds.), Opera theologica (Vol. 2). St. Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute.
William of Ockham. (1974). Summa logicae. In P. Boehner, G. Gál, & S. Brown (Eds.), Opera philosophica (Vol. 1). St. Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute.
Wyclif, J. (1985). In I. J. Mueller (Ed.), Tractatus de universalibus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Secondary Sources
Adams, M. M. (1982). Universals in the early fourteenth century. In N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny, & J. Pinborg (Eds.), The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy (pp. 411–439). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Adams, M. M. (1987). William Ockham (Vol. 2). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Conti, A. D. (2008). Categories and universals in the later Middle Ages. In L. A. Newton (Ed.), Medieval commentaries on Aristotle’s “Categories” (pp. 367–408). Leiden: Brill.
de Libera, A. (1996). La querelle des universeaux: De Platon à la fin du Moyen Age. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Dijs, J. (1990). Two anonymous twelfth-century tracts on universals. Vivarium, 28, 85–117.
Freddoso, A. (1978). Abailard on collective realism. Journal of Philosophy, 75, 527–538.
Gracia, J. J. E. (Ed.). (1994). Individuation in scholasticism: The later Middle Ages and the counter-reformation (1150–1650). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Häring, N. M. (Ed.). (1966). The commentaries on Boethius by Gilbert of Poitiers. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Henry, D. P. (1984). That most subtle question (Quaestio subtilissima): The metaphysical bearing of medieval and contemporary linguistic disciplines. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Jolivet, J. (1992). Trois variations médiévales sur l’universel et l’individu: Roscelin, Abélard, Gilbert de la Porrée. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 97, 111–155.
King, P. (2004). Metaphysics. In J. Brower & K. Guilfoy (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Abelard (pp. 65–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, P. (2011). Boethius’s anti-realist argument. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 40, 381–401.
Klima, G. (2008). The medieval problem of universals. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2008 edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/universals-medieval/ (Originally published 2000).
Kluge, E.-H. W. (1976). Roscelin and the medieval problem of universals. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 14, 405–414.
Marenbon, J. (2004). Life, milieu, and intellectual contexts. In J. E. Brower & K. Guilfoy (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Abelard (pp. 13–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marmura, M. (1979). Avicenna’s chapter on universals in the Isagoge of his Shifâ. In T. Welch & P. Cachia (Eds.), Islam past and present challenge: Studies in honor of W. M. Watt (pp. 34–56). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (repr. Marmura ME. Probing in Islamic philosophy: studies in the philosophies of Ibn Sina, al-Ghazali and other major Muslim thinkers. Global Academic, Binghamton, pp. 33–59).
Martin, C. J. (1983). The compendium Logicae Porretanum: A survey of philosophical logic from the school of Gilbert of Poitiers. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-age Grec et Latin, 46, xviii–xxivi.
Owens, J. (1957). Common nature: A point of comparison between Thomistic and Scotistic metaphysics. Mediaeval Studies, 19, 1–14.
Picavet, F. (1911). Roscelin: philosophe et théologien d’après la légende et d’après l’histoire. Paris: Alcan.
Spade, P. V. (1996). Boethius against universals: The arguments in the second commentary on porphyry. Unpublished. Available as PDF file from http://www.pvspade.com/Logic/index.html.
Tweedale, M. (1976). Abailard on universals. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Arlig, A.W. (2020). Universals. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_510
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_510
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1663-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1665-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities