Skip to main content

Thomas Aquinas

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

Thomas Aquinas was a scholastic theologian active in the thirteenth century, when scholars of the Latin West were assimilating the Aristotelian corpus (rendered into Latin by 1200). These writings and the Islamic-Judeo commentary tradition that accompanied their reception transformed every field of philosophical enquiry and reflected a worldview that led some medieval thinkers to assert that sound philosophical reasoning does on occasion contradict articles of faith and theological doctrine. Against this, Aquinas argued that faith and reason cannot contradict one another as both are from God. This famous synthesis helped to foster an intellectual culture that allowed for the development of Aristotelian empiricism alongside scholasticism’s deeply embedded, Platonic elements. Yet Aquinas was no mere apologist. Just as he produced numerous excellent commentaries on Aristotle, Aquinas likewise developed a metaphysics asserting a distinction between being and essence with respect to all entities save God. Joining to this distinction the medieval doctrine of the convertibility of transgeneric attributes of being (or transcendentals) such as goodness and truth, Aquinas develops a Christian Aristotelianism that informs his epistemology, natural theology, ethics, theory of natural law, philosophical psychology, and semiotics (treated in this entry). Aquinas’s proofs that God exists contend that contingent entities (for whom existence and essence are distinct) would not be were it not for the activity of God (the sole necessary entity, the one being for whom existence and essence are identical). Maximally existent, God is therefore maximally good (as goodness and being are convertible). Carrying this over to philosophical psychology, ethics, and natural law theory, Aquinas explains our free actions in terms of an innate desire for happiness, the chief human good, which desire is, at bottom, a desire for the beatific vision, in which the highest possible happiness is obtained. Aquinas’s semiotics then seeks to accommodate the meaning of theological discourse to its subject’s unique nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Anselm. (1998). Anselm of Canterbury: the major works, edited with an introduction by Davies B, Evans GR. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1882). The major works, edited with an introduction by Davies B, Evans GR. Oxford University Press. OxfLeonine editions may be found at http://leonina.nerim.net/?Opera.

  • Aquinas, T. (1912.net/?Operam.net/?Opera” \h ttrans: the Fathers of the English Dominican Province). (2nd rev. ed., 22 Vols.). London: Burns, Oates & Washbourne (repr. 5 vols, Christian Classics, Westminster, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1952 English Dominican Province) (2nd rev. ed., 22 Vols. Burns) (trans: Mulligan, R. W., McGlynn, J. V., & Schmidt, R. W.). Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1964). Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics (Sententia Libri Ethicorum) (2 Vols.) (trans: Litzinger, C. I.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1975). Summa contra gentiles (trans: Pegis, A. C. et al.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1993). On there being only one intellect (De unitate intellectus contra Averroistas) (trans: McInerny, R.). Aquinas against the Averroists. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1994). Commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima (Sententia Libri De anima) (trans: Foster, K., Humphries, S., intro: McInerny, R.). Notre Dame: Dumb Ox Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1995). Commentary on AristotleDumb Ox Books, Notre Dame Dame (trans: McInernytrans and intro: Rowan, J. P., preface: McInerny, R.). Notre Dame: Dumb Ox Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (2007a). Commentary on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics (Sententia super Posteriora analytica) (trans, intro, and comment: Berquist, R., preface: McInerny, R.). Notre Dame: Dumb Ox Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (2007b). Thomas Aquinas on the principles of nature (De principiis naturae) (trans: Klima, G.). In G. Klima, F. Allhoff, & A. J. Vaidya (Eds.), Medieval philosophy: Essential readings with commentary. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (2007c). Thomas Aquinas on being and essence (De ente et essentia) (trans and annot: Klima, G.). In G. Klima, F. Allhoff, & A. J. Vaidya (Eds.), Medieval philosophy: Essential readings with commentary. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1984). In B. J. Bollingen (Ed.), Series. The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (2 Vols.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • English translations of nearly all of Aquinas’s writings are available here.: http://dhspriory.org/thomas/. For Latin critical editions, see here: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html.

  • Henry of Ghent et al. (1963). Condemnation of 219 propositions. In R. Lerner & M. Mahdi (Eds.), Medieval political philosophy: A sourcebook (trans: Fortin, E. L., & O’Neill, P. D.). New York: Free Press. Maimonides Moses (1995) The guide of the perplexed (an abridged edition with intro and comment: Guttmann J, trans from the Arabic by Rabin C, new intro: Frank DH). Hackett, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Ashworth, J. (1991). Signification and modes of signifying in thirteenth century logic: A preface to Aquinas on analogy. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 1, 39–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, J. (1992). Analogy and equivocation in thirteenth-century logic: Aquinas in context. Medieval Studies, 54, 94–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppleston, F. C. (1955). Aquinas. Baltimore: Penguin Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (Ed.). (2002). Thomas Aquinas: Contemporary philosophical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2003). Aquinas. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Stump, E. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, E. (1994). The Christian philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas (trans: Shook, L. K.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, M. D. (1992). The alleged Aristotelianism of Thomas Aquinas. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (Ed.). (2007). Medieval philosophy: Essential readings with commentary. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, N. (1997). The metaphysics of theism: Aquinas’s natural theology in summa contra gentiles I. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, N. (1999). The metaphysics of creation: Aquinas’s natural theology in summa contra gentiles II. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, N. (2000). The metaphysics of providence: Aquinas’s natural theology in summa contra gentiles III. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 9(2), 3–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, N., & Stump, E. (Eds.). (1993). The Cambridge companion to Aquinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerny, R. (2003). Praeambula Fidei: Thomism and the God of the philosophers. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerny, R. (2004). Aquinas. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (2006). The treatise on the divine nature: Summa Theologiae I 1–13. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R., & Van Dyke, C. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge history of medieval philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanley, B. (2002). The Thomist tradition. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Shanley B (trans and comment).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, E. (2003). Aquinas. New York: Routledge. 1286 T Thomas Aquinas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrell, J.-P. (1996). Saint Thomas Aquinas, vol 1: The person and his work (trans: Royal, R.). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrell, J.-P. (2003). Saint Thomas Aquinas, vol 2: Spiritual master (trans: Royal, R.). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisheipl, J. A. (1974). Thomas D’Aquino: His life, thought and work. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippel, J. (2000). The metaphysical thought of Thomas Aquinas (Monographs of the society for medieval and renaissance philosophy 1). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander W. Hall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hall, A.W. (2020). Thomas Aquinas. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_490

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics