Skip to main content

Quantification

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Abstract

Medieval authors approached the semantic phenomenon now known as quantification essentially by means of the concept of supposition, more specifically the different modes of personal supposition. The modes of personal supposition were meant to codify the quantificational behavior of what we now refer to as quantifier expressions, and what the medievals referred to as syncategorematic terms. Perhaps the best way to understand the medieval approach to these quantifier expressions by means of the notion of supposition is as a two-step procedure that explicates their meaning and semantic behavior. First, the syntactical structure of the proposition, that is, the presence and order of its syncategorematic terms, determines the kind of personal supposition that each categorematic term has. Then, the semantic definitions of each mode of personal supposition determine the effect of quantifying syncategoremata over the quantity of objects involved in the assertion of a proposition. This entry discusses both groups of rules, and the contrasting thirteenth and fourteenth century approaches. The former is based on the verification of propositions and focuses on the semantics of quantifier expressions taken individually; the latter focuses on the inferential relations of ascent and descent between propositions with quantifying syncategorematic terms and singular propositions of the form “This a is b,” and on the study of the global quantificational effect of syncategorematic terms in wider propositional contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Sources

    Latin

    • Buridan, J. (1998). Summulae de suppositionibus (ed.: van der Lecq R.). Nijmegen: Ingenium.

      Google Scholar 

    • William of Ockham (1974) Opera philosophica I (eds.: Boehner, Ph., et al.). St. Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute.

      Google Scholar 

    • William of Sherwood. (1995). Einführung in die Logik (ed. and German trans: Brands, H., & Kann, C.). Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

      Google Scholar 

    English

    • Buridan, J. (2001). Summulae de dialectica (trans: Klima, G.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • William of Ockham. (1998). Summa logicae part I (trans: Loux, M.). South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • William of Sherwood. (1966). Introduction to logic (trans: Kretzmann, N.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

      Google Scholar 

    Secondary Sources

    • Ashworth, E. J. (1974). Language and logic in the post-medieval period. Dordrecht: Reidel.

      Book  Google Scholar 

    • Ashworth, E. J. (1978). Multiple quantification and the use of special quantifiers in early sixteenth century logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 19, 599–613.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • Dutilh Novaes, C. (2004). The Buridanian account of inferential relations between doubly quantified propositions: a proof of soundness. History and Philosophy of Logic, 25(3), 225–244.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • Dutilh Novaes, C. (2008). Logic in the 14th century after Ockham. In D. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), The handbook of the history of logic (Vol. 2, pp. 433–504). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

      Google Scholar 

    • Karger, E. (1993). A theory of immediate inferences contained in Buridan’s logic. In K. Jacobi (Ed.), Argumentationstheorie (pp. 407–429). Leiden: Brill.

      Google Scholar 

    • Karger, E. (1997). The 15th and early 16th century logicians on the quantification of categorical sentences. Topoi, 16(1), 65–76.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • Matthews, G. (1973). Suppositio and quantification in Ockham. Nous, 7, 13–24.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • Parsons, T. (1994). Anaphoric pronouns in very late medieval supposition theory. Linguistics and Philosophy, 17, 429–445.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • Parsons, T. (1997). Supposition as quantification versus supposition as global quantificational effect. Topoi, 16(1), 41–63.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • Priest, G., & Read, S. (1977). The formalization of Ockham’s theory of supposition. Mind, 86, 109–113.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • Spade, P. V. (1996). Thoughts, words and things. http://www.pvspade.com

    Download references

    Author information

    Authors and Affiliations

    Authors

    Editor information

    Editors and Affiliations

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

    About this entry

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this entry

    Novaes, C.D. (2020). Quantification. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_425

    Download citation

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics