Skip to main content

John Capreolus

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

John Capreolus, or Jean Cabrol, 1380–1444, Dominican friar, known as princeps thomistarum, was one of the most important and influential Thomists and commentators of Thomas Aquinas. Born in the French province of Rouergue, he studied at Paris and taught at Toulouse. He spent the last 20 years of his life in the Dominican convent of Rodez. His only surviving work, called Defensiones theologiae Divi Thomae Aquinatis, is a vast commentary on Peter Lombard’s Sentences which aims solely at defending St. Thomas’ theology and philosophy against a group of handpicked critics throughout the fourteenth century. His own position therefore corresponds to Aquinas’ thought. Yet in that perspective Capreolus was of great influence for future Thomists throughout the Middle Ages and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Capreolus John. (1899–1908). Defensiones theologiae Divi Thomae Aquinatis (ed.: Paban, C., & Pègues, T.). Tours: Cattier (repr. Minerva, Frankfurt-on-Main, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Capreolus John. (2001). On the virtues (ed.: Cessario, R., & White, K.). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Bedouelle, G., Cessario, R., & White, K. (Eds.). (1997). Jean Capreolus en son temps (1380–1444). Paris: Éditions du Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonino, S.-T. (1999). Albert le Grand dans les ‘Defensiones’ de Jean Cabrol (†1444). Contributions à la recherche sur les origines de l’albertisme tardif. Revue Thomiste, 99(2), 369–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ettore, D. (2013). John Capreolus on names said analogously of God and creatures. Thomist, 77, 395–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ettore, D. (2014). The fifteenth-century thomist dispute over participation in an analogous concept: John Capreolus, Dominic of Flanders, and Paul Soncinas. Mediaeval Studies, 76, 241–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabmann, M. (1956). Johannes Capreolus O.P., der ‘princeps thomistarum’ (†1444), und seine Stellung in der Geschichte der Thomistenschule. In M. Grabmann (Ed.), Mittelalterliches Geistesleben. Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Scholastik und Mystik (Vol. 3, pp. 370–410). Munich: Hueber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegyi, J. (1959). Die Bedeutung des Seins bei den klassischen Kommentatoren des heiligen Thomas von Aquin. Capreolus – Silvester von Ferrara – Cajetan. Pullach: Verlag Berchmanskolleg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, E. P. (2004). The accomplishment of Jean Capreolus, O.P. Thomist, 68(4), 601–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. A. (1974) The unity of a science: St. Thomas and the nominalists. In: St. Thomas Aquinas 1274–1974 (Commemorative studies, Vol. 2, pp. 269–291). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, S. (2004a). Sprache, Wirklichkeit und Allmacht Gottes. Das Bild der moderni bei Johannes Capreolus (1380–1444) und seine Bedeutung im Kontext der Schulbildung des 15. Jahrhunderts. In J. A. Aertsen & M. Pickavé (Eds.), Herbst des Mittelalters? Fragen zur Bewertung des 14. und 15. Jahrhunderts (pp. 157–172). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, S. (2004b). The ethics of John Capreolus and the ‘nominales’. Verbum, 6(2), 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, T. M., Jr. (2013). Continuity and innovation in Dominic Banez’s understanding of Esse: Banez’s relationship to John Capreolus, Paul Soncinas, and Thomas de Vio Cajetan. Thomist, 77, 367–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinckaers, S. (2001). Foreword. In J. Capreolus, On the virtues, R. Cessario and K. White (Ed.), (pp. xi–xxvi). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C. D. (2014). John Capreolus: Prince of Thomists or Corruptor of Thomism. Nova et Vetera. English Edition, 12(3), 837–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N. J. (1960–1961). Capreolus on essence and existence. Modern Schoolman, 38, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Jeschke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jeschke, T. (2020). John Capreolus. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_265

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics