Skip to main content

Alexandrian Tradition into Arabic: Philosophy

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

The doctrinal impact of the School of Alexandria on Arabic philosophy becomes increasingly clear, thanks to a deeper knowledge of the textual tradition of Arabic and Syriac philosophy. One may go as far as to see in al-Fārābī (d. 950), Avicenna (c. 980–1037), and the respective traditions they initiated, the culmination of the scholarly endeavor of Ammonius and his successors. But at first glance, this Arabic synthesis left no room for Plato and the Chaldean Oracles. In fact, the articulation of Aristotelian logical and physical inquiries with Plato’s theological insights, which had prevailed in Alexandria, gave way to a system wherein the rational sciences reached their highest point in a nondiscursive contact with an Eternal entity, whether God or a lower principle. The process of reception of the Alexandrian tradition into Arabic began in the eighth century and ended in the eleventh century. Alexandrian philosophy continued to nurture Arabic thought up to Averroes’ time (1126–1198) and beyond.

In what follows, the expressions “Alexandrian philosophy” and “Alexandrian philosophers” will refer to the School of Ammonius son of Hermias (around 470 to after 517), his students and their students, and Simplicius (c. 490–560), who was also known to the Arabic authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • ‘Abd al-Laṭīf b. Yūsuf b. Muḥammad al-Baġdādī, Fuṣūl Muntaza‘a (ed. and trans. by Rashed, M.) (2004) Priorité du ΓENO∑ ou de l’EIΔO∑ entre Andronicos et Alexandre. Vestiges arabes et grecs inédits. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 14, 9–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ḥunayn b. Iṣḥāq, al-‘Ibādī. (1985). Ādāb al-falāsifa (Sentences of the philosophers) (ed.: Badawī, ‘A.). Koweit: Publications de l’Institut des Manuscrits Arabes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ, ‘Abd Allāh: Danish-Pazuh M. (1978). Manṭiq Ibn al-Muqaffa‘. Tehran: Anjuman-i Shahanshahi Falsafah-i Tihran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn al-Nadīm, Abū l-Faraj Muḥammad b. Abī Ya‘qūb (s.d.). Kitāb al-Fihrist, mit Anmerkungen herausgegeben von Flügel G; erster Band: den Text enthaltend. von Dr. Johannes Roediger. Beirut: Maktabat Ḫayyāṭ (repr F.C.W. Leipzig: Vogel, 1871).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn al-Ṭayyib, Abū l-Faraj ‘Abd Allāh: Gyekye K. (1986). Ibn al-Ṭayyib’s Commentary on Porphyry’s Eisagoge. Beyrouth: Dar El-Machreq Editeurs, Librairie Orientale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn al-Ṭayyib, Abū l-Faraj ‘Abd Allāh: Ferrari C. (2006). Der Kategorienkommentar von Abū l-Faraġ ‘Abdallah ibn aṭ-Ṭayyib. Text und Untersuchungen. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn Suwār, Abū l-Khayr al-Ḥasan (Ibn S.) b. Bābā b. al-Khammār: Khalīl Georr. (1948). Les Catégories d’Aristote dans leurs versions syro-arabes (pp. 361–388). Beyrouth: Institut Français de Damas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn Zurʿa, Abū ‘Alī ‘Īsä b. Isḥāq. (1994). Manṭiq Ibn Zurʿa (ed.: Jīhāmī, J.). Beirut: Dar al-fikr al-lubnani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najjar, F. M. (Ed.). (1971). Alfarabi’s Fuṣūl Muntazaʿa. Beirut: Dar El-Mashreq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thābit b. Qurra, Abū l-Ḥasan, ap. Barhebraeus. Abbeloos B, Lamy ThI. (Eds.). (1872/1877). Gregorii Bar Hebraei Chronicon Ecclesiasticum (3 vols.). Louvain; English translation: (1932/1976) Bar Hebraeus, The chronology (trans.: Budge, E. W.). London: Oxford University Press, 1932; Amsterdam: APA Philo Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaḥyā b. ʿAdī, Abū Zakariyā: Khalifat S. (1988). Yaḥyä b. ʿAdī. The philosophical treatises. A critical edition with an introduction and a study. Amman: University of Jordan.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Arnzen, R. (1998). Aristoteles’ De Anima. Eine verlorene spätantike Paraphrase in arabischer und persischer Überlieferung. Arabischer Text nebst Kommentar. quellengeschichtichen Studien und Glossaren. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnzen, R. (2002). Abū l-ʿAbbās an-Nayrīzī, Exzerpte aus (Ps.-?) Simplicius’ Kommentar zu den Definitionen, Postulaten und Axiomen in Euclids Elementa I. Eingeleitet, ediert und mit arabischen und lateinischen Glossaren versehen. Köln: Essen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertolacci, A. (2006). The reception of Aristotle’s metaphysics in Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Shifā’. A milestone of western metaphysical thought. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ancona, C. (2001). Review: “Aristoteles’ “De Anima”. Eine verlorene spätantike Paraphrase in arabischer und persischer Überlieferung by Rüdiger Arnzen”. Oriens, 36, 340–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ancona, C. (2002). Commenting on Aristotle: From late antiquity to the Arab Aristotelianism. In W. Geerlings & C. Schulze (Eds.), Der Kommentar in Antike und Mittelalter (pp. 201–251). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ancona, C. (2006). The topic of the ‘Harmony between Plato and Aristotle’: Some examples in early Arabic philosophy. In A. Speer & L. Wegener (Eds.), Wissen über Grenzen. Arabische Philosophie und lateinische Mittelalter (pp. 379–405). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ancona, C. (2009). Greek sources in Arabic and Islamic philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/arabic-islamic-greek/

  • Endress, G. (1977). The works of Yaḥyā ibn ʿAdī. An analytical inventory. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G. (1990). The defence of reason: The plea for philosophy in the religious community. Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften, 6, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G. (1991a). Der Erste Lehrer: der arabische Aristoteles und das Konzept der Philosophie im Islam. In U. Tworuschka (Ed.), Gottes ist der Orient – Gottes ist der Okzident. Festschrift für Falaturi A (pp. 151–181). Wien/Köln: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G. (1991b). La ‘Concordance entre Platon et Aristote’, l’Aristote arabe et l’émancipation de la philosophie en Islam médiéval. In B. Mojsisch & O. Pluta (Eds.), Historia Philosophiae Medii Aevi. Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters (Festschrift K. Flasch) (pp. 237–257). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Grüner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G. (1994). Al-Kindī über die Wiedererinnerung der Seele: arabischer Platonismus und die Legitimation der Wissenschaften im Islam. Oriens, 34, 174–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G. (1997a). L’Aristote arabe. Réception, autorité et transformation du Premier Maître. Medioevo, 23, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G. (1997b). ‘The circle of al-Kindī’. Early Arabic translations from the Greek and the rise of Islamic philosophy. In G. Endress & R. Kruk (Eds.), The ancient tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism. Studies on the transmission of Greek philosophy and sciences dedicated to H. J. Drossaart Lulofs on his ninetienth birthday (pp. 43–76). Leiden: Research School CNWS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G. (2003). Athen – Alexandria – Bagdad – Samarkand. Übersetzung, Überlieferung und Integration der griechischen Philosophie im Islam. In P. Bruns (Ed.), Von Athen nach Bagdad zur Rezeption griechischer Philosophie von der Spätantike bis zum Islam (pp. 42–62). Bonn: Borengässer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G. (2007). Building the library of Arabic philosophy. Platonism and Aristotelianism in the sources of al-Kindī. In C. D’Ancona (Ed.), The libraries of the Neoplatonists (pp. 319–350). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (1958–1959). Some fragments of the translation of the De Anima. Cah Byrsa, 8, 231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, G. (1988). La philosophie de la géométrie d’al-Fārābī. Son commentaire sur le début du Ier livre et le début du Ve livre des Eléments d’Euclide. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, 11, 104–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gätje, H. (1971). Studien zur Überlieferung der aristotelischen Psychologie im Islam. Annales Universitatis Saraviensis (Reihe: Philosophische Fakultät, Vol. XI) (ed.: Langen, A. C.). Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gätje, H. (1982). Simplicius in der arabischen Überlieferung. Der Islam, 59, 6–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghorab, A. (1972). The Greek commentators on Aristotle quoted in al-ʿĀmirī’s Al-Saʿāda wa-l-isʿād. In S. M. Stern, A. Hourani, & V. Brown (Eds.), Islamic philosophy and the classical tradition (pp. 77–88). Oxford: Bruno Cassirer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakis, E. (1998). Yahyā ibn ‘Adî against John Philiponus on place and void. Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften, 12, 245–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakis, E. (2002/2003). The quotations from John Philoponus’ De aeternitate mundi contra Proclum in al-Biruni’s India. Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften, 15, 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D. (1983). Paul the Persian on the classification of the parts of Aristotle’s philosophy: A milestone between Alexandria and Bagdad. Der Islam, 60(2), 231–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D. (1985). The starting point of philosophical studies in Alexandrian and Arabic Aristotelianism. In W. W. Fortenbaugh et al. (Eds.), Theophrastus of Eresus. On his life and work (Rutgers University studies in classical humanities, Vol. 2, pp. 115–123). New Brunswick/Oxford: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D. (1986). Philoponus and Avicenna on the separability of the intellect: A case of orthodox Christian–Muslim agreement. Greek Orthodox Theological Review, 31, 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D. (1999a). The ‘Alexandria to Baghdad’ complex of narratives. A contribution of the study of philosophical and medical historiography among the Arabs. Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale, 10, 155–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D. (1999b). Greek thought, Arabic culture. The Graeco-Arabic translation movement in Baghdad and early ‘Abbāsid society (2nd–4th/8th–10th centuries). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, I. (1987). La vie et l’œuvre de Simplicius d’après des sources grecques et arabes. In I. Hadot (Ed.), Simplicius, sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie (pp. 3–39). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, I. (1990). The life and work of Simplicius in Greek and Arabic sources. In R. Sorabji (Ed.), Aristotle transformed, the ancient commentators and their influence (pp. 275–304). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, I. (2007a). Dans quel lieu le néoplatonicien Simplicius a-t-il fondé son école de mathématiques, et où a pu avoir lieu son entretien avec un manichéen? International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, 1, 42–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, I. (2007b). Remarque complémentaire. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, 1(2), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogendijk, J. P. (2008). The Introduction to Geometry by Qusṭā ibn Lūqā: Translation and Commentary. Suhayl, 8, 163–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugonnard-Roche, H. (1990). Les traductions du grec au syriaque et du syriaque à l’arabe. In J. Hamesse & M. Fattori (Eds.), Rencontres de cultures dans la philosophie médiévale. Traductions et traducteurs de l’Antiquité tardive au XIVe siècle (pp. 131–147). Louvain-la-Neuve/Cassino: Louvain-la-Neuve/Università degli Studi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugonnard-Roche, H. (2004). La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugonnard-Roche, H. (2009). La tradition gréco-syriaque des commentaires d’Aristote. In V. Calzolari & J. Barnes (Eds.), L’œuvre de David l’Invincible et la transmission de la pensée grecque dans la tradition arménienne et syriaque (Commentaria in Aristotelem Armeniaca – Davidis Opera, Vol. 1). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugonnard-Roche, H. (2011). Du commentaire à la reconstruction: Paul le Perse interprète d’Aristote. Interpreting the Bible and Aristotle – the Alexandrian commentary tradition between Rome and Baghdad. Aldershot: Ashgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolivet, J. (1993). Al-Kindī. Vues sur le temps. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 3, 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, J. L. (1965). A lost passage from Philoponus’ Contra Aristotelem in Arabic translation. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 85, 318–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, J. L. (1986). Philosophy in the renaissance of Islam, Abū Sulaymān al-Sijistānī and his circle. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettinck, P. (1994). Aristotle’s Physics and its reception in the Arab world. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettinck, P. (1999). Aristotle’s Meteorology and its reception in the Arab world. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, C. (1990). Review “R. Thiel, Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen, Stuttgart, 1999”. Mnemosyne, 54, 482–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, J., & Reisman, D. (2005). Classical Arabic philosophy: An anthology of sources. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, F. E. (1968). Aristoteles Arabus. The oriental translations and commentaries on the Aristotelian corpus. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, S. (1972). An Arabic summary of a lost work of John Philoponus. Israel Oriental Studies, 2, 294–326 (repr (1986) The collected works of Shlomo Pines, II, Studies in Arabic versions of Greek texts and in medieval science (pp. 320–352). Jerusalem/Leiden: Magnes Press/Brill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingree, D. (1980). Some of the sources of the Ghāyat al-hakīm. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 43, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingree, D. (1989). Indian planetary images and the tradition of astral magic. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 52, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingree, D. (1993). Plato’s Hermetic Book of the Cow. In P. Prini (Ed.), Il Neoplatonismo nel Rinascimento (pp. 133–145). Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingree, D. (1997). Mašā’allāh: Greek, Pahlavī, Arabic and Latin astrology. In A. Hasnawi, A. Elamrani-Jamal, & M. Aouad (Eds.), Perspectives arabes et médiévales sur la tradition scientifique et philosophique grecque (pp. 123–136). Leuven/Paris: Peeters/Institut du Monde Arabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingree, D. (2001). Artificial demons and miracles. Res Orientales, 13, 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingree, D. (2002). The Sabians of Harran and the classical tradition. International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 9(1), 8–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingree, D. (2006). From Hermes to Jābir and the Book of the Cow. Magic and the classical tradition (Warburg Institute Colloquia, Vol. 7). London/Turin: Warburg Institute/Nino Aragno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashed, M. (2004). Priorité du ΓΕΝΟΣ ou de l’ΕΙΔΟΣ entre Andronicos et Alexandre. Vestiges arabes et grecs inédits. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 14, 9–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashed, M. (2005). Les marginalia d’Aréthas, Ibn al-Ṭayyib et les dernières gloses alexandrines à l’Organon. In D. Jacquart & C. Burnett (Eds.), Scientia in margine. Études sur les marginalia dans les manuscrits scientifiques du Moyen Age à la Renaissance (pp. 57–73). Genève: Droz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, F. (1940). On the knowledge of Plato’s Philosophy in the Islamic World. Islam Culture, 14, 387–422. (Variorum: chap. II).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, F. (1966). Two Graeco-Arabic works on music. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 110(4), 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, F. (1972). A commentator of Aristotle. In S. M. Stern, A. Hourani, & V. Brown (Eds.), Islamic philosophy and the classical tradition. Essays presented by his friends and pupils to Richard Walzer on his seventieth birthday (pp. 337–349). Oxford: Bruno Cassirer. (Variorum: chap. V).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, F. (1990). Greek philosophy in the Arab world. A collection of essays (Variorum collected studies series CS 322). Aldershot: Ashgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabra, A. I. (1969). Simplicius’s Proof of Euclid’s Parallels Postulate. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 32, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troupeau, G. (1984). Un épitomé arabe du De contingentia mundi de Jean Philopon. In E. Lucchesi & H. D. Saffrey (Eds.), Mémorial André-Jean Festugière. Antiquité païenne et chrétienne (pp. 77–88). Genève: P. Cramer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallat, P. (2004). Farabi et l’École d’Alexandrie. Des prémisses de la connaissance à la philosophie politique. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallat, P. (2011a). Simplicius a-t-il dédié l’un de ses commentaries sur Aristote à un Ḥarrānien? In P. Vallat (Ed.), Le parcours syrien du néoplatonisme. Damas/Paris: IFPO/Geuthner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallat, P. (2011b). Al-Fārābī’s arguments for the eternity of the world. In J. Watt & J. Lössl (Eds.), Interpreting the Bible and Aristotle – the Alexandrian commentary tradition between Rome and Baghdad. Aldershot: Ashgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, J. (2009). Al-Fārābī and the history of the Syriac Organon. Analecta Gorgiana, 129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, E. (2005). Where to live the philosophical life in the sixth century? Damascius, Simplicius, and the Return from Persia. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 45, 285–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisnovsky, R. (2002). Final and efficient causality in Avicenna’s Cosmology and Theology. Quaestio, 2, 97–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisnovsky, R. (2003). Avicenna’s Metaphysics in context. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisnovsky, R. (2004). The nature and scope of Arabic philosophical commentary in post-classical (ca. 1100–1900 AD) Islamic intellectual history: Some preliminary observations. In P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, & M. W. F. Stone (Eds.), Philosophy, science and exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin commentaries (Vol. 2, pp. 149–191). Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 83(1–2) (Suppl). London: Institute of Classical Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Vallat, P. (2020). Alexandrian Tradition into Arabic: Philosophy. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics