Abstract
Albert of Saxony (early 1320s – July 8, 1390) was born in or near Helmstedt in the early 1320s. He studied at the University of Paris, and became the first rector of the University of Vienna. Albert was very influential in both natural philosophy and logic, and many of his works were already printed several times by the early sixteenth century. He was thoroughly familiar with the works of many of his contemporaries at Paris (John Buridan and Nicholas Oresme), as well as with important works from Oxford philosophers (Thomas Bradwardine, William of Ockham, William of Heytesbury). He drew extensively on these sources, but made important innovations in both logic and natural philosophy. Among other things, Albert was one of the defenders of the so-called impetus theory for projectile motion. This theory claimed that the proximate cause of the motion of a projectile was a force inherent in the projectile itself, in contrast to the more traditional (Aristotelian) view that the proximate cause was inherent in the part of the air that was adjacent to the projectile. Albert died in Halberstadt on July 8, 1390, where he had been the bishop from 1366 onward.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Albert of Saxony. (1971). Tractatus proportionum (ed.: Busard, H. L. L.) (Der Tractatus proportionum von Albert von Sachsen. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, math.-nat. Klasse, Denkschriften, Vol. 116(2), pp. 44–72). Vienna: Springer.
Albert of Saxony. (1988a). Perutilis logica. O Lógica Muyútil (ed. with Spanish trans. Muñoz-Garcia, A.). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (this is a transcription of the 1522 Venice edition and includes a Spanish translation).
Albert of Saxony. (1988b). Quaestiones in Artem Veterem (ed.: Muñoz-Garcia, A. Edición critica, ed. with Spanish trans. Muñoz-Garcia, A.). Maracaibo: Universidad del Zulia.
Albert of Saxony. (1993). De proprietates terminorum (ed.: Kann, C., Die Eigenschaften der Termini). Leiden: Brill (this is the second tract of the Perutilis logica).
Albert of Saxony. (1999). Quaestiones super libros Physicorum (ed.: Patar, B.) (Expositio et Quaestiones in Aristotelis Physicam ad Albertum de Saxonia attributae, 3 vols.). Louvain: Editions Peeters.
Albert of Saxony. (2002). Questiones circa logicam. In M. J. Fitzgerald (Ed.), Albert of Saxony’s twenty-five disputed questions on logic. A critical edition of his Quaestiones circa logicam (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, Vol. 79). Leiden: Brill. (For a list of corrections to this edition, see the review by H. Weidemann in History and Philosophy of Logic 25: 235–244).
For a list of all the manuscripts and early printed editions of Albert of Saxony, see: Muñoz-Garcia, A. (1990). Albert of Saxony. Bibliographie. Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 32, 161–190; also, see the appendix in Sarnowsky (1989).
Secondary Sources
Berger, H. (1994). Albert von Sachsen (1316[?]–1390). Bibliographie der Sekundärliteratur. Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 36, 148–185 (updated in issues (1995), 37:175–186; (1996), 38:143–152; (1998), 40:103–116; and in Acta Mediaevalia (2004), 17:253–279).
Biard, J. (1989). Les sophismes du savior: Albert de Saxe entre Jean Buridan et Guillaume Heytesbury. Vivarium, 27, 36–50.
Biard, J. (Ed.). (1991). Itinéraires d’Albert de Saxe Paris- Vienne Au XIVeSiècle. Actes du colloque organisé le 19–22 juin 1990 dans le cadre des activités de l’URA 1085 du CNRS à l’occasion du 600eanniversaire de la mort d’Albert de Saxe. Paris: Vrin.
Biard, J. (1992). Conception sémiologique de la science et statut ontologique de la quantité dans le nominalisme parisien du XIVe siècle. In G. F. Vescovini, & F. Barocelli (Eds.), Filosofia scienza e astrologia nel Trecento europeo: Biagio Pelacani Parmense. Atti del Ciclo di lezioni Astrologia, scienza, filosofia e società nel Trecento europeo, Parma, 5–6 ottobre 1990 (pp. 135–154).
Biard, J. (1993). Albert de Saxe et les Sophismes de l’Infini. In S. Read (Ed.), Sophisms in medieval logic and grammar. Acts of the ninth European symposium for medieval logic and semantics, held at St Andrew, June 1990 (pp. 288–303). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Braakhuis, H. A. G. (1993). Albert of Saxony’s De obligationibus. Its place in the development of fourteenth century obligational theory. In K. Jacobi (Ed.), Argumentationstheorie. Scholastische Forschungen zu den logischen und semantischen Regeln korrekten Folgerns (pp. 323–341). Leiden: Brill.
Celeyrette, J., & Mazet, E. (2003). Le mouvement du point de vue de la cause et le mouvement du point de vue de l’effet dans le Traité des rapports d’Albert de Saxe. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences, 56(2), 419–437.
Fitzgerald, M. J. (2003). The medieval roots of reliabilist epistemology: Albert of Saxony’s view of immediate apprehension. Synthese, 136, 409–434.
Fitzgerald, M. J. (2006). Problems with temporality and scientific propositions in John Buridan and Albert of Saxony. Vivarium, 44(2–3), 305–337.
González, A. (1958). The theory of assertoric consequences in Albert of Saxony [to be continued]. Franciscan Studies, 18(3–4), 290–354. (continued in Franciscan Studies, 19(1–2):13–114).
Grant, E. (1991). The unusual structure and organization of Albert of Saxony’s Questions on De caelo. In J. Biard (Ed.), Itinéraires d’Albert de Saxe Paris- Vienne Au XIVeSiècle. Actes du colloque organisé le 19–22 juin 1990 dans le cadre des activités de l’URA 1085 du CNRS à l’occasion du 600eanniversaire de la mort d’Albert de Saxe (pp. 191–217). Paris: Vrin.
Grass, R. (2003). Schluβfolgerungslehre in Erfurter Schulen des 14. Jahrhunderts. Eine Untersuchung der Konsequentientraktate von Thomas Maulfelt und Albert von Sachsen in Gegenüberstellung mit einer zeitgenössischen Position (Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie, Vol. 37). Amsterdam: Grüner.
Heidingsfelder, G. (1927). Albert von Sachsen. Sein Lebensgang und sein Kommentar zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles (Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Vol. 22). Münster: Aschendorff.
Kann, C. (1993). Zur Behandlung der dialektischen Örter bei Albert von Sachsen. In K. Jacobi (Ed.), Argumentationstheorie. Scholastische Forschungen zu den logischen und semantischen Regeln korrekten Folgerns (pp. 59–80). Leiden: Brill.
Kann, C. (1994). Die Eigenschaften der Termini. Eine Untersuchung zur Perutilis logica Alberts von Sachsen. Leiden: Brill.
Sarnowsky, J. (1989). Die aristotelisch-scholastische Theorie der Bewegung. Studien zum Kommentar Alberts von Sachsen zur Physik des Aristoteles (Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters, Neue Folge 32). Münster: Aschendorff.
Sarnowsky, J. (1999). Place and space in Albert of Saxony’s commentaries on the physics. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 9(1), 25–45.
Sarnowsky, J. (2004). Nicole Oresme and Albert of Saxony’s commentary on the physics: The problems of vacuum and motion in a void. In S. Caroti & J. Celeyrette (Eds.), Quia inter doctores est magna dissensio. Les débats de philosophie naturelle à Paris au XIVesiècle, Leo S (pp. 161–174). Firenze: Olschki.
Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (2004). The Buridan school reassessed. John Buridan and Albert of Saxony. Vivarium, 42(1), 18–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
De Boer, S. (2020). Albert of Saxony. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1663-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1665-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities