Skip to main content

Syllogism, Theories of

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

Aristotle’s theory of the syllogism is one of the most influential theories ever developed. The theory of the syllogism for assertoric sentences was a remarkable achievement by Aristotle and it was virtually complete already from the beginning. Medieval logicians could generally not add much to it. Small changes were made and it was systematized in different ways. It was not until John Buridan in the mid-fourteenth century reworked logic in general and placed the theory in a context of a wider logic of consequences that the picture of syllogistics also changed. The theory of the modal syllogism was at a completely different stage of completion in the Prior Analytics, and in the hands of the medievals, it went through a remarkable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Abelard, P. (1956). Dialectica (ed.: de Rijk, L. M.). Wijsgerige teksten en studies 1. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert the Great. (1890). Liber I Priorum analyticorum (ed.: Borgnet, A.). Opera omnia, Vol. I. Paris: Vivès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1962). Analytica priora (ed.: Minio-Paluello, L.). Aristoteles Latinus III.1–4. Bruges/Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buridan, J. (1976). Tractatus de consequentiis (ed.: Hubien, H.). Philosophes médiévaux 16. Louvain: Publications Universitaires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buridan, J. (2000). Summulae de dialectica, an annotated translation with a philosophical introduction by Gyula Klima. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilwardby, R. (1516). In libros Priorum analyticorum expositio, printed under the name Aegidius Romanus. Venice (Repr. Frankfurt 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Migne, J. P. (1847). Manlii Severini Boetii opera omnia (Patrologia Latina 64). Paris: Migne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minio-Paluello, L. (1958). Twelfth century logic: Texts and studies (II Abaelardiana inedita). Rome: Edizioni di Storia Letteratura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard of Campsall. (1968). The works of Richard of Campsall I: Questiones super librum Priorum analeticorum (ed.: Synan, E. A.). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008). Anicii Manlii Severini Boethii De syllogismo categorico: Critical edition with introduction, translation, notes and indexes (Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia 68). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2015). Anonymus Aurelianensis III in Aristotelis Analytica priora. Critical edition, introduction, notes, and indexes. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trutfetter, J. (1501). Summulae totius logicae, quod opus maius appelitare libuitur. Erfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • William of Ockham. (1974). Summa logicae (eds.: Boehner, Ph., Gál, G., & Brown, S.). OP 1. St. Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute of St. Bonaventure University.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Becker, A. (1933/1968). Die aristotelische Theorie der Möglichkeits-schlüsse. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochenski, I. (1956). Formale Logik. Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, J. S. (1990). The truth and falsity of modal propositions in Renaissance nominalism. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, J. (1974). Aristotle’s natural deduction system. In J. Corcoran (Ed.), Ancient logic and its modern interpretations. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbesen, S. (1981). Analyzing Syllogisms or anonymous Aurelianensis III: The (presumably) earliest extant Latin commentary on the prior analytics, and its Greek model. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin, 37, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freddoso, A. J. (1980). Ockham’s theory of truth conditions. In A. J. Freddoso & H. Schuurman (Trans.), Ockham’s theory of propositions: Part II of the Summa Logicae. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, N. J. (1984). The tradition of the topics in the Middle Ages. München: Philosophia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. E. (1989). The modal logic of John Buridan. In G. Corsi, C. Mangione, & M. Mugnai (Eds.), Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Storia della Logica. Le Teorie della Modalità. Bologna: CLUEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karger, E. (1980). Would Ockham have shaved Wyman’s beard. Franciscan Studies, 40, 244–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (1985). Jean Buridan’s logic. The treatise on supposition. The treatise on consequences, translation with introduction and notes (Synthese historical library 27). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, S. (1993). Modalities in medieval philosophy. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, S. (1996). Early English discussions of Aristotle’s modal syllogistic. In J. Marenbon (Ed.), Aristotle in Britain during the Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerlund, H. (2000). Modal syllogistics in the Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukasiewicz, J. (1957). Aristotle’s syllogistic from the standpoint of modern formal logic (2nd enlarged ed.). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patzig, G. (1968). Aristotle’s theory of the syllogisms. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1974). A new approach to Aristotle’s apodeictic syllogisms. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Studies in modality (American philosophical quarterly monograph series, no. 8). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncaglia, G. (1996). Palaestra rationis. Discussioni su natura della copula e modalità nella filosofia “scolastica” tedesca del XVII secolo. Florence: Leo S. Olschki Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1989). Aristotle’s prior analytics, translated with introduction, notes and commentary. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1995). Logic. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Aristotle (pp. 27–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, P. (2005). Medieval modal systems. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2010). The Anonymous Aurelianensis III and the reception of Aristotle’s prior analytics in the Latin West. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin, 79, 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2013). The Anonymous Aurelianensis III and Robert Kilwardby on the prior analytics. In J. L. Fink, H. Hansen, & A. M. Mora-Marquez (Eds.), Logic and language in the Middle Ages: A volume in honour of Sten Ebbesen (pp. 185–198). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uckelman, S., & Lagerlund, H. (2016). The logic in the Latin thirteenth century. In C. Duthil-Novaes & S. Read (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to medieval logic (pp. 74–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Lagerlund .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Crown

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lagerlund, H. (2020). Syllogism, Theories of. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_479-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_479-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics