Abstract
Giles of Rome (c. 1243/7–1316) was the first member of the order of Augustinian Hermits to be appointed regent master of theology at the University of Paris and later became archbishop of Bourges. By 1282, he had composed On the Rule of Princes, a manual of instruction for secular rulers dedicated to the future French king Philip IV. The work, which proved immensely popular throughout the later Middle Ages, drew heavily upon Aristotelian ideas to offer a portrait of the ideal ruler. Giles considered a well-educated hereditary king free from any form of limitation to be best able to obtain the common good for those he ruled. During the 1290s and first years of the fourteenth century, Giles became closely associated with Pope Boniface VIII and subsequently involved in his struggle with Philip IV over issues of ecclesiastical jurisdiction. In the course of one of these Franco-papal disputes, Giles composed On Ecclesiastical Power, a work which drew on Aristotelian language to establish and defend an influential vision of society’s structure in which temporal power was entirely subordinated to spiritual power. Giles argued not only that all legitimate secular rule, but even all legitimate right to property, was ultimately derived from the church. His model equated the power vested in the church with the power vested in the papal office and thereby established the pope as the ultimate authority in both spiritual and temporal affairs. The pope possessed an authority free from any effective limitations, although Giles argued he should, in imitation of God’s governance of the universe, seek to restrain himself from interfering in temporal affairs in all but exceptional circumstances. The two phases of Giles’ political thought have sometimes been considered contradictory although they share a similar view of hierarchical structures and the nature of rulership.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Primary Sources
On the Rule of Princes
Giles of Rome. (1607). De regimine principum libri tres. Rome: Bartholomæum Zannettum.
Giles of Rome. (1899). Li livres du gouvernement des rois. A XIIIth century French version of Egidio Colonna’s treatise De regimine principum (ed.: Molenaer, S. P.). New York: Columbia University Press.
On the Abdication of the Pope
Giles of Rome. (1992). Aegidius Romanus, De renunciatione pape (ed.: Eastman, J. R.). Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.
On Ecclesiastical Power
Giles of Rome. (1908). Un trattato inedito di Egidio Colonna (ed.: Boffito, G. & Oxilia, G. U.). Florence: Successori Seeber.
Giles of Rome. (1929). Aegidius Romanus De ecclesiastica potestate (ed.: Scholz, R.). Weimar: Hermann Bermann Nachfolger.
Giles of Rome. (2004). Giles of Rome’s On Ecclesiastical Power. A medieval theory of world government (ed. & trans.: Dyson, R. W.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Secondary Sources
Blythe, J. M. (1992). Ideal government and the mixed constitution in the High Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Boase, T. S. R. (1933). Boniface VIII. Oxford: Constable.
Briggs, C. F. (1999). Giles of Rome’s De regimine principum: Reading and writing politics at Court and University, c. 1275-c.1525. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Briggs, C. F. (2016). Life, works, and legacy. In C. F. Briggs & P. S. Eardley (Eds.), A companion to Giles of Rome (pp. 6–33). Leiden: Brill.
Briggs, C. F., & Eardley, P. S. (Eds.). (2016). A companion to Giles of Rome. Leiden: Brill.
Coleman, J. (1987). The two jurisdictions: Theological and legal justifications of Church property in the thirteenth century. Studies in Church History, 24, 75–110.
Coleman, J. (1998). Some relations between the study of Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Ethics and Politics in late thirteenth-century and early fourteenth-century university arts courses and the justification of contemporary civic activities (Italy and France). In J. Canning & O. G. Oexle (Eds.), Political thought and the realities of power in the Middle Ages (Politisches Denken und die Wiklichkeit der Macht im Mittelalter) (pp. 127–157). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Del Punta, F., et al. (1993). Egidio Romano. In Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani (Vol. 42, pp. 319–341). Rome: Treccani.
Dyson, R. W. (2003). Normative theories of society and government in five medieval thinkers: St Augustine, John of Salisbury, Giles of Rome, St. Thomas Aquinas, and Marsilius of Padua. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen.
Eastman, J. R. (1990). Giles of Rome and Celestine V: The Franciscan revolution and the theology of abdication. Catholic Historical Review, 76(2), 195–211.
Genet, J.-P. (2003). L’évolution du genre des Miroirs des princes en Occident au Moyen Âge. In S. Cassagnes-Brouquet, A. Chauou, D. Pichot, & L. Rousselot (Eds.), Religion et mentalités au Moyen Âge. Mélanges en l’honneur d’Hervé Martin (pp. 531–541). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
Homann, E. (2004). Totum posse, quod est in ecclesia, reservatur: Studien zur politischen Theorie bei Aegidius Romanus. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Krüger, E. (2006). Der Traktat De ecclesiastica potestate des Aegidius Romanus. Eine spätmittelalterliche Herrschaftskonzeption des päpstlichen Universalismus. Cologne: Böhlau.
Krynen, J. (1993). L’empire du roi. Idées et croyances politiques en France XIIIe-XVe siècle. Paris: Gallimard.
Kuiters, R. (1958). Aegidius Romanus and the authorship of In utramque partem and De ecclesiastica potestate. Augustiniana, 8, 267–280.
Lambertini, R. (1995). The Prince in the mirror of philosophy. Uses of Aristotle in Giles of Rome’s De regimine principum. In B. C. Bazán, E. Andújar, & J. G. Sbrocchi (Eds.), Les philosophies morales et politiques au Moyen Âge/Moral and Political philosophies in the Middle Ages. Proceedings of the ninth international congress of medieval philosophy, Ottawa, 17–22 August 1992 (pp. 1522–1534). Ottawa: Publications du Laboratoire de la pensée ancienne et médiévale, Université d’Ottawa.
Lambertini, R. (2016). Political thought. In C. F. Briggs & P. S. Eardley (Eds.), A companion to Giles of Rome (pp. 255–274). Leiden: Brill.
Luna, C. (1992). Un nuovo documento del conflitto fra Bonifacio VIII e Filippo il Bello: il discorso ‘De potentia domini pape’ di Egidio Romano (con un’appendice su Borromeo di Bologna e la ‘Eger cui lena’). In F. D. Punta, G. Fioravanti, G. C. Garfagnini, & C. Leonardi (Eds.), Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 3:1 (pp. 167–243). Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo.
McAleer, G. (1999). Giles of Rome on political authority. Journal of the History of Ideas, 60(1), 21–36.
McCready, W. D. (1974). Papal Plenitudo Potestatis and the source of temporal authority in late medieval papal hierocratic theory. Speculum, 48(4), 654–674.
McIlwain, C. H. (1932). The growth of political thought in the west: From the Greeks to the end of the Middle Ages. New York: Macmillan.
Merisalo, O. (1998). William, translator of Aegidius Romanus. In J. Hamesse (Ed.), Roma, magistra mundi: itineraria culturae medievalis. Mélanges offerts au Père L. E. Boyle à l’occasion de son 75e anniversaire, 2 (pp. 585–596). Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Études Médiévales.
Miethke, J. (2000). De potestate papae. Die päpstliche Amtskompetenz im Widerstreit der politischen Theorie von Thomas von Aquin bis Wilhelm von Ockham. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Perret, N.-L. (2011). Les traductions françaises du De regimine principum de Gilles de Rome: parcours matériel, culturel et intellectuel d’un discours sur l’éducation. Leiden: Brill.
Pini, G. (2012). Building the Augustinian identity: Giles of Rome as master of the order. In K. Emery Jr., W. J. Courtenay, & S. M. Metzger (Eds.), Philosophy and theology in the Studia of the religious orders and at papal and Royal Courts (pp. 409–426). Turnhout: Brepols.
Renna, T. (1978). Aristotle and the French monarchy, 1260–1303. Viator, 9, 309–324.
Rivière, J. (1926). Le problème de l’Église et de l’État au temps de Philippe le Bel. Étude de théologie positive. Paris: Champion.
Scholz, R. (1903). Die Publizistik zur Zeit Philipps des Schönen und Bonifaz’ VIII. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der politischen Anschauungen des Mittelalters. Stuttgart: Enke.
Ubl, K., & Vinx, L. (2000). Kirche, Arbeit und Eigentum bei Johannes Quidort von Paris. In C. Egger & H. Weigl (Eds.), Text – Schrift – Codex. Quellenkundliche Arbeiten aus dem Institut für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung, Mitteilungen des Instituts für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung, Ergänzungsband, 35 (pp. 304–344). Vienna: Oldenbourg.
Ullmann, W. (1976). Boniface VIII and his contemporary scholarship. Journal of Theological Studies, 27(1), 58–87.
Wilks, M. J. (1963). The problem of sovereignty in the later Middle Ages. The papal monarchy with Augustinus Triumphus and the publicists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Jones, C. (2018). Giles of Rome, Political Thought. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_191-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_191-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities